METODIČKA VEŽBANJA U VRTIĆU: KONTEKST SARADNJE STUDENATA, VASPITAČA I NASTAVNIKA

Uzdanica XX 2 (2023) (str. 235-249)

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Gordana M. Stepić, Dejan S. Savičević

E-ADRESA / E-MAIL: gstepic@np.ac.rs

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/Uzdanica20.2.235S

SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:

Cilj istraživanja je sagledavanje i razumevanje perspektive stude- nata – budućih vaspitača o oblicima saradnje studenata, vaspitača i nastavnika tokom metodičkih vežbanja u vrtiću. Namernim uzorkom obuhvaćeni su studenti (ukupno 27) osnovnih strukovnih studija Visoke škole strukovnih studija za vaspitače i poslovne informatičare – Sirmijum, koji su metodička vežbanja realizovali u vrtićima PU „Pčelica” u Sremskoj Mitrovici. Tokom obrade podataka dobijenih anketnim upitni- kom sagledavane su relevantne teme i kategorije korišćenjem tematske analize. Rezul- tati istraživanja pokazali su da se saradnja ostvaruje pretežno kroz vođenje i pružanje pomoći i deljenje, dok je zajednički rad u većoj meri prisutan na nivou razumevanja   i potrebe, nego na nivou praktikovanja u vrtiću. Ovim radom ukazujemo i na mogući način organizacije i realizacije metodičkih vežbanja u vrtiću koji prevazilazi usme- renost na pripremanje studenata za izvođenje aktivnosti, već podstiče saradnju budućih vaspitača sa vaspitačima i nastavnicima u domenu zajedničkog planiranja i razvijanja realnog programa, razmene profesionalnih ideja, zajedničkog rešavanja problema, po- smatranja i refleksije.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:

studenti – budući vaspitači, metodička vežbanja, saradnja

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • Benet, Išler, O’Laflin (1992): R. V. Bennett, M. F. Ishler, M. O’Loughlin, Effective collaboration in teacher education, Action in Teacher Education, 14(1), 52–56.
  • Braun, Klark (2006): V. Braun, V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Buš, Grođehen (2020): A. Bush, N. Grotjohann, Collaboration in teacher edu- cation: A cross-sectional study on future teachers’ attitudes towards collaboration, their intentions to collaborate and their performance of collaboration, Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102968.
  • Volš, Elmzli (2005): K. Walsh, L. Elmslie, Practicum Pairs: An Alternative for First Field Experience in Early Childhood Teacher Education, Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 5–21.
  • Glen (2006): W. J. Glenn, Model versus mentor: Defining the necessary qualities of the effective cooperating teacher, Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 85–95.
  • Godine uzleta, Osnove programa predškolskog vaspitanja i obrazovanja (2019). Beograd: Prosvetni pregled d.o.o.
  • Gođoti (2017): E. Gourgiotou, Trainee Teachers’ Collaborative and Reflective Practicum in Kindergarten Classrooms in Greece: A Case Study Approach, The Educa- tional Review, 2(1), 117–128, http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2018.01.001.
  • Grir (2012): J. A. Greer, Professional Learning and Collaboration (doctoral dis- sertation), Virginia: Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  • Grosman, Vajnberg, Vulvort (2001): P. Grossman, S. Wineburg, S. Woolworth, Toward a Theory of Teacher Community, Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.
  • Jang, Ešbi, Boaz, Grejson (2002): K. Young, D. Ashby, A., Boaz, L. Grayson, Social Science and the Evidence-based Policy Movement, Social Policy and Society, 1, 215–224.
  • Klark, Džarvis-Selindžer (2005): A. Clarke, S. Jarvis-Selinger, What the teach- ing perspectives of cooperating teachers tell us about their advisory practices, Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 65–78, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.11.006.
  • Kouk (2005): P. K. Coke, Practicing what we preach: An argument for coopera- tive learning opportunities for elementary and secondary educators, Education, 126(2), 392–398.
  • Krnjaja (2014): Ž. Krnjaja, Disciplinarni ili integrisani kurikulum: tri razlike, Nastava i vaspitanje, 63(2), 189–202.
  • Krnjaja (2015): Ž. Krnjaja, Projektni pristup učenju u predškolskim pro- gramima, Pedagogija, 2, 188–199.
  • Lejv, Venger (1991): J. Lave, E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355.
  • Litl (1990): J. W. Little, The persistence of privacy: autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations, Teachers’ College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
  • Miškeljin (2016): L. Miškeljin, Mentorstvo kao kolaboracija praktičara – perspektiva mentora, Nastava i vaspitanje, 65(2), 395–410.
  • Ostin, Boldvin (1992): A. E. Austin, R. G. Baldwin, Faculty collaboration: En- hancing the quality of scholarship and teaching, Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
  • Pavlović Breneselović, Krnjaja (2017): D. Pavlović Breneselović, Ž. Kr- njaja, Kaleidoskop. Osnove diversifikovanih programa predškolskog vaspitanja i obrazovanja, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Institut za pedagogiju i andragogiju.
  • Pravilnik o standardima kompetencija za profesiju vaspitača i njegovog profesionalnog razvoja (2018): Sl. glasnik RS – Prosvetni glasnik, br. 16/2018.
  • Renken (1998): B. Rankin, Education as Collaboration − Learning from and Build- ing on Dewey, Vygotski, and Piaget, In: The Hundred Languages of Children – The Reggio Emilia Approach, Advanced Reflections, London: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 70–83.
  • Roli (1999): J. Rowley, What is knowledge management?, Library Management, 20(8), 416–420, https://doi.org/10.1108/01435129910291175.
  • Saldana (2015): J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers, Thou- sand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Smit (2016): K. Smith, Partnerships in Teacher Education – Going Beyond the Rhetoric, with Reference to the Norwegian Context, CEPS Journal, 6(3), 17–36.
  • Stepić, Prlić (2019): G. Stepić, I. Prlić, Stručna praksa budućih vaspi- tača iz perspektive studenata i vaspitača-mentora, u: Inicijalno obrazovanje i stručno usavršavanje vaspitača – partnerstvo u građenju kvaliteta, Druga među- narodna naučno-stručna konferencija „Inicijalno obrazovanje i stručno usavrša- vanje vaspitača – partnerstvo u građenju kvalitetaˮ, Sremska Mitrovica: VŠSSV- PI, 51–62.
  • Tomas (2000): J. W. Thomas, A review of research on project-based learning, San Rafael: Autodesk Foundation.
  • Ferije-Ker (2005): J. Ferrier-Kerr, Working together: Collaborative strategies for developing effective professional relationships in the practicum, paper presented at 35th an- nual conference Australian Association of Research in Education (AARE), Sydney, Aus- tralia. Retrieved in June 2022 from www: https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2003/ fer03456.pdf.
  • Forman, Fajf (1998): G. Forman, B. Fyfe, Negotiated Learning Through Design, Documentation, and Discourse, In: The Hundred Languages of Children – The Reggio Emilia Approach, Advanced Reflections, London: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 239–260. Fulen (2001): M. Fullan, The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York: Teacher College Press, London: Routledge/Falmer.
  • Fulen, Hagrivs (1991): M. Fullan, A. Hargreaves, What’s Worth Fighting for in Your School?, New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Hagrivs, Okonor (2018): A. Hargreaves, M. T. O’Connor, Leading collaborative professionalism, Retrieved in January 2022 from: http://www.andyhargreaves.com/up-loads/5/2/9/2/5292616/seminar_series_274april2018.pdf.
  • Cekić-Jovanović, Marković (2021): O. Cekić-Jovanović, S. Marković, Possi- bilities of University Teaching Enhancement – Integration of Methods and Approaches in Teaching Literature with Science and Social Studies, Inovacije u nastavi, 34(1), 80–94, doi: 10.5937/inovacije2101080C.
  • Dženg (2006): S. J. Jang, Research on the effects of team teaching upon two second- ary school teachers, Educational Research, 48(2), 177–194.

sotverski alatijelen

avlovic@iee

t.org