ŽENSKA MUŠKOST: FILON ALEKSANDRIJSKI IZMEĐU MIZOGINIJE I FEMINIZMA

Nasleđe 59 (2024) [223-232]

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Aleksandar S. Đakovac

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/NasKg2459.223DJ

SAŽETAK /ABSTRACT:

Filon Aleksandrijski spada među najznačajnije posrednike judaizma i helenizma na razmeđu stare i nove ere. Njegov uticaj na razvoj hrišćanske egzegeze ali i teologije i etike u celini bio je ogroman, zbog čega je zadobio mesto oca crkve honoris causa. Njegov stav prema ženama mnogi su opisivali kao izrazito mizogen, pripisujući mu maligni uticaj na kasnije hrišćanske pisce. U ovom radu ćemo pokušati da rasvetlimo razloge takvog Filonovog stava ali i da ukažemo na mogućnosti drugačijeg kontekstualizovanja njegovih ideja. Osnov za takvu mogućnost leži u Filonovoj simboličkoj ontologizaciji muškosti i ženskosti, pri čemu se ovi pojmovi delimično distanciraju od konkretnih muškaraca i žena, što omogućava stvarnu promenu njihovog položaja u simboličkom poretku sveta.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS: 

Filon Aleksandrijski, seksualnost, muškost, ženskost, asketizam

LITERATURA/ REFERENCES:

IZVORI
  • Cohn et all. 1896–1915: L. Cohn, P. Wendland, S. Reiter (eds.), Philonis Alexandri opera quae supersunt, Berlin: Typis et impensis G. Reimerii.
LITERATURA
  • Baynes 2002: L. Baynes, Philo, Personification and the Transformation of Grammatical Gender, Atlanta, Studia Philonica Annual 14, Atlanta, 31–47.
  • Boyarin 1993: D. Boyarin, Carnal Israel: Reading Sex in Talmudic Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press, 77–83.
  • Đakovac 2019: A. Đakovac, Ko su bili Terapeuti u Vita Contemplativa Filona Aleksandrijskog, Beograd, Teološki pogledi 52.3, 601–618.
  • Frick 1999: P. Frick, Divine Providence in Philo of Alexandria, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  • Karras 2000: R. M. Karras, Active/Passive, Acts/Passions: Greek and Roman Sexualities, Athen, Historical Review 105.4, 1250–1265.
  • Lloyd 1993: G. Lloyd, The Man of Reason. ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy, London: Routledge.
  • Loader 2011: W. Loader, Philo, Josephus, and the Testaments on Sexuality: Attitudes Towards Sexuality in the Writings of Philo and Josephus and in the Testaments of the Twelve Patriachs, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing.
  • Loader 2021: W. Loader, Sexuality and Gender: Collected Essays, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  • Long 1968: A. A. Long, The Stoic Concept of Evil, Oxford: The Philosophical Quarterly 18.73, 329–343.
  • Niehoff 2017: M. R. Niehoff, Between Social Context and Individual Ideology: Philo’s Changing Views of Women, in: Marie-Theres Wacker (ed.), Early Jewish Writings, Eileen Schuller, Atlanta: SBL Press, 187–204.
  • Ruether 1974: R. R. Ruether, Virginal Feminism in the Fathers of the Church, in: R. Radford (ed.), Religion and Sexism: Images of Women in the Jewish and
  • Christian Traditions, New York: Simon and Schuster, 150–183.
  • Sly 1987: I. Sly, The Perception of Women in the Writing of Philo of Alexandria, PhD Thesis, McMaster University, <http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15770>, 23. 3. 2021.
  • Taylor 2017: J. Taylor, Real Women and Literary Airbrushing: The Women “Therapeutae” of Philo’s De vita contemplativa and the Identity of the Group, in: Schuller E. Wacker (ed.), Early Jewish Writings, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 205–224.
  • Wegner 1991: J. R. Wegner, Philo’s Portrayal of Women—Hebraic or Hellenic?, In: A.-J. Levine (ed.), Women like this: New Perspectives on Jewish Women in the Greco-Roman World, Atlanta: Scholars Press, 41–66.