11th International Scientific Conference Technics, Informatics and Education – TIE 2026, (pp. 269-274)
AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Anđelija Mitrović
, Maja Radović
, Aleksandar Jovičić
, Jelena Jovanović
and Aleksandra Nikitović
Download Full Pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/TIE26.269M
SAŽETAK /ABSTRACT:
While Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software is widely used in engineering practice, manual technical drawing remains an essential component of engineering education because it develops spatial visualization skills, promotes the understanding of technical standards, and enhances the ability to interpret technical documentation. A major challenge in teaching Technical Drawing is the heterogeneous background of students, reflected in their varying levels of prior knowledge and graphical skills. Combined with limited classroom time, these differences often hinder the acquisition of fundamental technical drawing principles. To address this issue, this paper proposes a flipped classroom model for the Technical Drawing course. The model is based on short video lectures that students watch before class to acquire theoretical knowledge and learn drawing procedures, while face-to-face class time is devoted to practical exercises, discussion, and individualized guidance. The paper presents the proposed teaching model, including the organization of learning materials, learning activities and student assessment. The proposed model is intended as a conceptual framework for future implementation and experimental validation, aiming to improve students’ preparedness, increase classroom engagement, and provide more opportunities for active learning.
KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:
Flipped classroom; technical drawing; engineering education; active learning; heterogeneous student backgrounds
PROJEKAT / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, and these results are parts of the Grant No. 451-03-33/2026-03/ 200132, with University of Kragujevac-Faculty of Technical Sciences Cacak.
LITERATURA / REFERENCES:
- Giesecke, F. E., Mitchell, A., Spencer, H. C., Hill, I. L., Dygdon, J. T., & Novak, J. E. (2023). Technical Drawing with Engineering Graphics. Pearson.
- Simmons, C. H., & Maguire, D. E. (2020). Manual of Engineering Drawing. Elsevier.
- Sorby, S. A. (2012). Developing Spatial Thinking. Cengage Learning.
- Contero, F. Naya, Pedro Company,J. L. Saorín, J.Pastor. (2005). Improving Visualization Skills in Engineering Education. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25(5), 24-31. DOI: 10.1109/MCG.2005.107
- Contero, M., Company, P., Saorín, J. L., & Naya, F. (2009). Evaluating background and prior knowledge: A case study on engineering graphics learning. Computers & Education, 53(3), pages 695–700. doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.010
- Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.
- Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta.
- O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
- Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.
- Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43, doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
- Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2019). The impact of flipped classrooms on student achievement in engineering education: A meta-analysis of 10 years of research. Journal of Engineering Education, 108, 523–546. org/10.1002/jee.20284
- Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
- Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313–340. doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274
- Sari, W. P., Saputro, A. H., & Safitri, T. H. (2023). Flipped classroom and reflective practice for active learning during online class: An experience in engineering drawing module. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 9(2), 144–149.
