UČEŠĆE NASTAVNIH MATERIJALA U OBLIKOVANJU DISKURSA UČIONICE ENGLESKOG KAO JEZIKA STRUKE

Lipar 90 (2026)  (171-187 str.)

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Milica M. Kočović Pajević

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/LIPAR90.171KP

SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:

Rad istražuje na koji način nastavni materijali, pre svega udžbenici za Engleski kao jezik struke (EJS) i njihovi digitalni prateći resursi, oblikuju diskurs učionice. Polazeći od žanrovske lingvistike, analize diskursa, multimodalnosti, digitalne autentičnosti i principa učenja zasnovanog na zadacima, rad pokazuje da udžbenici ne funkcionišu samo kao jezički input, već kao „diskurzivni okvir” koji modeluje profesionalne žanrove, interakcione obrasce i komunikativne uloge. U radu se kritički razmatraju ograničenja tradicionalnih modela evaluacije udžbenika i predlaže interdisciplinarni okvir evaluacije koji integriše žanrovsku autentičnost, multimodalnu reprezentaciju, dizajn zadataka, digitalnu pragmatiku i mehanizme formativnog praćenja napretka. Analiziraju se mehanizmi kojima materijali strukturiraju diskurs učionice: oblikovanje žanrovskih modela, transformacija sadržaja u zadatke, multimodalno podučavanje i uloga nastavnika kao medijatora, a zatim se daju konkretne implikacije za nastavnike, autore i izdavače, sa naglaskom na adaptaciju materijala, integraciju digitalnih resursa i povezanost sa analizom potreba. Rad na kraju predlaže smernice za buduća istraživanja, uključujući kontekstualno raznovrsna empirijska istraživanja i ispitivanje mogućnosti savremenih tehnologija u modelovanju profesionalnih komunikacija.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:

Engleski kao jezik struke, EJS, diskurs učionice, evaluacija udžbenika, žanrovsko modeliranje, multimodalnost, digitalna autentičnost, dizajn zadataka

PROJEKAT / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • Andrade, Valtčeva 2009: H. Andrade & A. Valtcheva, Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment, Oxford: Theory Into Practice, 48(1), Oxford, 12–19.
  • Basturkmen 2010: H. Basturkmen, Developing courses in English for specific purposes, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bogdanović 2017: V. Bogdanović, Žanr i metadiskurs u odabranim udžbenicima engleskog jezika  struke, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
  • Brin 2001: M. Breen, Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research, London: Routledge.
  • Bhatia 2002: V. Bhatia, Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Barcelona: Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE), 4, Barcelona,  3–19.
  • Van Lier 2000: L. Van Lier, From Input to Affordance: Social Interactive Learning from an Ecological Perspective, in: J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Oxford: Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning: Recent Advances, Oxford, 245–259.
  • Veninger 2021: C. Weninger, Multimodality in critical language textbook analysis, Oxfordshire: Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(2), Oxfordshire, 133–146.
  • Vet 2011: R. Wette, Product–process distinctions in ELT curriculum theory and practice, Oxford: ELT Journal, 65(2), Oxford, 136–144.
  • Gilmor 2007: A. Gilmore, Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning, Oxford: Language Teaching, 40(2), Oxford, 97–118.
  • Guo i dr. 2023: X. Guo, S. Zhang & Y. Z. Wang, Multimodality in language education: Implications of a multimodal affective methodology in foreign language teaching, Lausanne: Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
  • Dadli Evans, Sent Džon 1998: T. Dudley-Evans & M. J. St John, Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Elis 2017: R. Ellis, Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward, Oxford: Language Teaching, 50(4), Oxford, 507–526.
  • Kočović Pajević 2025: M. Kočović Pajević, Evaluation of an ESP textbook from psychology students’ perspective – a pilot study, Jagodina: Uzdanica, 22 (1), Jagodina, 197–211.
  • Kočović Pajević 2024: M. Kočović Pajević, Evaluacija udžbenika za engleski kao jezik struke neposrednih korisnika u obrazovnom procesu (neobjavljena doktorska disertacija), Kragujevac: Univerzitet u Kragujevcu.
  • Kres, Van Leuen 2006: G. Kress & T. van Leeuwen, Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lim i dr. 2022: F. V. Lim, W. Toh & T. Nguyen, Multimodality in the English language classroom: A systematic review of literature, Amsterdam: Linguistics and Education, 69.
  • Litldžon 1998: A. Littlejohn, The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse, in: B. Tomlinson (Ed.) Materials development in language teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 190–216.
  • Lic 2005: D. R. A. Litz, Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study, Pampanga: Asian EFL Journal, 48(1), Pampanga, 1–53.
  • Long 2015: M. H. Long, Second language acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Long 2005: M. H. Long, Methodological issues in learner needs analysis, in: M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–76.
  • Lurido-Badia 2023: I. Lourido-Badía, Analysis of English for specific purposes materials: Sports sciences and psychology ESP materials in the EFL classroom, Niš: Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 11(3), Niš: 777–792.
  • Mek Grat 2002: I. McGrath, Materials evaluation and design for language teaching, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Mišan 2022: F. Mishan, The global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella’s slipper?, London: Language Teaching, 55(4), London, 490–505.
  • Robinson 1991: P. Robinson, ESP today: A practitioner’s guide, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Svejlz 1990: J. Swales, Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smit 2024: G. Smith, The Role of Pragmatics in Cross-Cultural Communication, Manchester: European Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), Manchester, 13–24.
  • Soe 2024: T. Soe, Investigating Critical Thinking in ELT Textbooks: A Systematic Literature Review of Textbook Evaluation Studies, Katowice: Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 10(1), Katowice, 1–29.
  • Tomlinson 2013: B. Tomlinson, B. (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching, London: Bloomsbury.
  • Tomlinson 2010: B. Tomlinson, Principles of effective materials development, in: N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice, New York: Cambridge University Press, 80–108.
  • Tomlinson 2003: B. Tomlinson, Materials evaluation, in: B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing Materials for Language Teaching, London: Continuum, 15–36.
  • Hajland 2015: K. Hyland, Teaching and researching writing, London: Routledge.
  • Halidej, Hasan, 1985: M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan, Language, Context and Text:
  • Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective, Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  •  Harbi 2017: A. A. M. Harbi, Evaluation study for secondary stage EFL textbook: EFL Teachers’ Perspectives, Oxford: English Language Teaching, 10(3), Oxford, 26–39.
  • Hafner, Ho 2020: C. A. Hafner & W. Y. J, Ho, Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model, Amsterdam: Journal of Second Language Writing, 47.
  • Hačinson, Voters 1987: T. Hutchinson & A. Waters, English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Šak i dr. 2022: M. S. Y. Shak, I. S. M. A. Albakri, S. S. Shukor & M. H. M. Tahir, Criteria in English language textbook evaluation checklists: A systematic review, Kongsberg: IARTEM E-Journal, 14(1), Kongsberg, 1–19.
  • Šeldon 1988: L. E. Sheldon, Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials, Oxford: ELT Journal, 42(4), Oxford, 237–246. 
Post Views: 32