Sadašnjost i budućnost uslužnog prava (2022) str. 99-111
AUTOR(I): Stefan Šokinjov
DOI: 10.46793/XVIIIMajsko.099S
SAŽETAK:
Preduzećem se u pravu konkurencije smatra svaki entitet koji obavlja privrednu delatnost bez obzira na pravni status i način finansiranja. Pod privrednom delatnošću se podrazumeva nuđenje roba i usluga na tržištu. S obzirom da se određuje u odnosu na delatnost, a ne pravnu formu subjekta koji delatnost obavlja, definisanje preduzeća je funkcionalno, a pojam preduzeća vrlo široko određen, tako da osim subjekata kompanijskog prava obuhvata i one subjekte koji nisu registrovani za obavljanje privredne delatnosti. Osim fizičkih i pravnih lica, preduzećem se u pravu konkurencije smatra i poslovna grupa, bez obzira što joj nedostaje pravni subjektivitet, pod uslovom da povezana privredna društva formiraju jedinstvenu ekonomsku celinu.
KLJUČNE REČI:
pravo konkurencije, Evropska unija, preduzeće, privredna delatnost.
LITERATURA:
- Banovčanin-Heuberger, I., Pojam preduzeća u pravu konkurencije Evropske unije, Zbornik radova: Vodič kroz Pravo Evropske unije, Beograd, 2009.
- Dabbah, M., EC and UK Competition Law, Commentary, Cases and Materials, Cambridge, 2004.
- Daskalova, V., Regulating the new self-employed in the Uber economy: What role for EU Competition law?, TILEC Discussion Paper DP 2017-028, July 2017.
- Freund, B., Reshapingliability– the concept of undertaking applied to private enforcement of EU Competition law, GRUR International, No. 8/2021.
- Jevremović Petrović, T., Potreba regulisanja povezanih društava u pravu EU, Zbronik radova: Usklađivanje poslovnog prava Srbije sa pravom Evropske unije, Beograd, 2012.
- Louri, V., ’Undertaking’ as a Jurisdictional Element for the Application of EC Competition Rules, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, No. 2/2002.
- Marković Bajalović, D., Povezana društva u pravu privrednih društava i pravu konkurencije, Pravna riječ, br. 32/2012.
- Moisejevas, R., Urbonas, D., Problems related to determining of a single economic entity under Competition law, Yearbook of Antritrust and Regulatory Studies, 2017.
- Poščić, A., Pojam poduzetnika u europskom pravu tržišnog natjecanja, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, br. 2/2008.
- Sanchez-Graells, A., Herrera Anchustegui, I., Revisiting the concept of undertaking from a public procurement law parspective – A discusion on Easy Pay and Finance Engineering https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2695742, pristupljeno januara 2022. godine.
- Søs Jacobsen Cesko, K., Blurringtheboundariesbetweenbeingemployeeandself-employed– An EU competition law analysis of the employment status of Wolt couriers, Law Research Paper Series No. 20-32, Copenhagen Business School.
- Svetlicinii, A., Back to the basics: Concepts of undertaking and economic activity in the SELEX judgment, European Law Reporter, No 12/2009.
- Townley, C., The concept of an ‘undertaking’: the boundaries of the corporation – A discussion of Agency, Employees and Subsidiaries, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1358649, pristupljeno januara 2022. godine.
- Tratnik, M., Ferčič, A., EU Competition Law, Maribor/Belgrade 2008.
Sudska praksa
- Joined cases 17 & 20/61 Klöckner-Werke AG and Hoesch AG v. High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community, Judgment of 13.7.1962.
- Case 19/61 Mannesmann AG v. High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community, Judgment of 13.7.1962.
- C-41/90 KlausHöfnerandFritzElserv.MacrotronGmbH [1991] ECR I-1979. C-118/85 Commissionv.Italy [1987] ECR 2599.
- C-387/93 Banchero [1995] ECR I-4663.
- C- 343/95 Diego Cali & Figli Srl v. Servizi ecologici porto di Genova SpA (SPEG), ECR [1997] I-01547.
- C- 364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft v. Eurocontrol [1994] ECR I-43.
- C-159/91 Poucet et Pistre v. Assurances Generales de France [1993] ECR I-637.
- C-244/94 FederationFrancaisedesSocietesd’Assurancev.Ministerede l’Agriculture et da le Peche [1995] ECR I-4013.
- C-67/96 Albany [1999] ECR I-5751.
- C-115-117/97 Brentjens [1999] ECR I-6025.
- C-219/97 Drijvende Bokken [1999] ECR I-6121.
- C-218/00 Cisal di Battistello Venanzio and C. Sas v. Istituto nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL) [2002] ECR I-6911.
- C-264/01 AOK – Bundesverband and others v. Ichthyol-Gesellschaft Cordes [2004] ECR I- 2493.
- Case 40/73 Suiker Unie v. Commission [1975] 1663.
- C-444/11 P Team Relocations and Others v. Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2013:464.
- C-286/98 P Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB v. Commission of the European Communities [2000] ECR I-9925.
- C-179/12 P The Dow Chemical Company v. European Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2013:605. C-516/15 P Akzo Nobel NV, ECLI:EU:C:2017:314.
- C-15/74 Centrafarm BV and Adnaan de Peijper v. Sterling Drug Inc, [1974] ECR 1183.
- Case 170/83 Hydrotherm Geratebau GmbH v. Compact del Dott Ing Mario Andreoli&C Sas [1984] ECR 2999.
- C-882/19 Sumal SL v. Mercedes Benz Trucks Espaňa SL, ECLI:EU:C:2021:800.