ACQUIS NE UTER

Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske unije (2024) (str. 253-267)

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Dragan Dakić

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/UPSSXII.253D

SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:

Da li Republika Srbija može postati članica Evropske unije, uz istovremeno zadržavanje politike vojne neutralnosti? Ovo istraživačko pitanje je postavljeno iz dva ključna razloga. Prvo, u postupku pristupanja Evropskoj uniji (EU), Republika Srbija (Srbija) se obavezala da usvoji i primjeni Acquis Communautaire u svom pravnom sistemu. Izraz Acquis označava sveobuhvatan skup pravnih izvora koji sadrži primarne i sekundarne izvore prava, kao i elemente koji se tiču Zajedničke spoljne i bezbjednosne politike. Kao što je autor na drugom mjestu prethodno napomenuo, ovde posebno mjesto pripada Poglavlju 31, koje se odnosi na politički dijalog sa EU, odnos između države kandidata i institucija EU, angažman u aktivnostima međunarodnih subjekata kao što su UN, OEBS i Savjet Evrope, zajedno sa propisima koji se odnose na kontrolu naoružanja, evropsku bezbjednost i odbrambenu politiku, saradnju sa NATO-om i aktivnostima u borbi protiv terorizma. Drugo, Narodna skupština Republike Srbije je 2007. godine, usvojila Rezoluciju o zaštiti suvereniteta, teritorijalnog integriteta i ustavnog poretka Republike. Ključni aspekt ove rezolucije je deklaracija o vojnoj neutralnosti Srbije, koja je uslovljena istorijskim kontekstom djelovanja NATO-a u regionu. Posebno, stavka o vojnoj neutralnosti je ustanovljena zbog bombardovanja Srbije 1999. godine, koje je počinjeno bez odobrenja Savjeta bezbednosti Ujedinjenih nacija.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:

Srbija, neutralnost, EU, NATO.

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • Antimiani, A., et al., The role of clean energy technologies in achieving carbon neutrality: An empirical assessment of the EU climate policy, Energy Economics, no. 119/2023, 106524. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106524.
  • Vaahtoranta, T., Forsberg, T., Post-Neutral or Pre-Allied? Finnish and Swedish Policies on the EU and NATO as Security Organisations, 2000.
  • Vrčar, M., Ćurčić, A., Military Cooperation between Serbia and NATO: Opportunities and Challenges, International Journal of Security Studies, no. 15(2)/2022.
  • Dakic, D., Is There a Legal Obligation to Use Artificial Intelligence in the European Union Accession Process?, In: Filipović, N. (eds) Applied Artificial Intelligence 2: Medicine, Biology, Chemistry, Financial, Games, Engineering. AAI 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 999. Springer, Cham, 2024a. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60840-7_28
  • De Witte, B., European Law as an Academic Discipline: Unity and Fragmentation, in Bulterman, M., Hancher, L., McDonnell, A., Sevenster, G. H. (eds),Views of European Law from the Mountain. Liber Amicorum Piet Jan Slot, Alphen, Kluwer Law International, 2009. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/10910
  • European Parliament, 2011. The open internet and net neutrality in Europe. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1431032441362&uri=CELEX:52011IP0511 [Accessed 8 June 2021]
  • European Union (1992) Treaty on European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 191, 29 July. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A11992M%2FTXT (Accessed: 14 September 2024).
  • European Union, 2015. Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/2120/oj [Accessed 27 October 2021].
  • International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (1907) Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land. Available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/200 (Accessed: 14 September 2024).
  • International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (1907) Hague Convention (XIII) Concerning the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers in Naval War. Available at: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/240 (Accessed: 14 September 2024).
  • Chadwick, E., Neutrality in Contemporary International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  • Clancy, P., Conditional Neutrality: Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness, Journal of International Law, no. 45(1)/2023.
  • Clapham, A., Gaeta, P., (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict (2014; online edn, Oxford Academic, 2 June 2014), https://doi.org/10.1093/law/ 9780199559695.001.0001, accessed 14 Aug. 2024.
  • Marković, G., Mladenović, I., NATO’s Relations with Serbia from the Left Perspective. In: Decolonial Politics in European Peripheries. [online] Available at: [URL], 2023.
  • Morris, K., White, T. J., Neutrality and the European Union: The case of Switzerland, Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, no. 3/2011.
  • Robinson, W., Gender Neutrality in EU Legislative Drafting. European Journal of Law Reform, no. 22(1)/2020, doi: 10.5553/EJLR/138723702020022001002.
  • Schmitt, M. N., Absolute Neutrality and Contemporary Warfare, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, no. 27(3)/2022.
  • UNSC Res 1199 (23 September 1998) UN Doc S/RES/1199.
  • UNSC Res 1373 (28 September 2001) UN Doc S/RES/1373.
  • UNSC Res 502 (3 April 1982) SCOR Resolutions and Decisions 15.
  • UNSC Res 660 (2 August 1990) SCOR Resolutions and Decisions 19 [1]-[2].
  • UNSC Res 661 (n 61) [3].
  • Upcher, J., Neutrality in Contemporary International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
  • Huang, Z., Ying, Y., The application of the principle of distinction in the cyber context: A Chinese perspective, International Review of the Red Cross, no. 102(913)/2020. doi:10.1017/S1816383121000023