DIVNAʼ AND ʻPETRAʼ NEW LATE RIPENING PLUM CULTIVARS RELEASED AT FRUIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE, ČAČAK

1st International Symposium On Biotechnology (2023),  [133-141]

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Nebojša Milošević, Ivana Glišić, Milena Đorđević, Slađana Marić, Sanja Radičević, Darko Jevremović

E-MAIL: mnebojsa@ftn.kg.ac.rs

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/SBT28.133M

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

In this study, the most important characteristics of tree vigour and productivity, as well as pomological traits (fruit morphometric and chemical characteristics) of new late ripening cultivars ʻDivnaʼ and ʻPetraʼ released at Fruit Research Institute, Čačak were evaluated and compared to standard cultivar ʻStanleyʼ. Both new cultivars had slightly larger tree and yield in comparison to ʻStanleyʼ, but smaller fruit in general. ʻPetraʼ had the best chemical properties of fruit followed by ʻDivnaʼ. Both new cultivars could be very interesting for growing in new orchards due to very late ripening time, good fruit quality and high cropping potential and also could be used in further breeding activities.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

plum, new cultivars, ripening time, fruit properties, yield

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  • Blažek J., Pišteková I. (2009). Preliminary evaluation results of new plum cultivars in a dense planting. Horticultural Science. 36: 45–54.
  • Colarič M., Veberič R., Štampar F., Hudina M. (2005). Evaluation of peach and nectarine fruit quality and correlations between sensory and chemical attributes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 85: 2611–2616.
  • Crisosto C.H., Crisosto G.M., Echeverria G., Puy J. (2007). Segregation of plum and pluot cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 44: 271‒276.
  • Crisosto C.H., Garner D., Crisosto G.M., Bowerman E. (2004). Increasing ʻBlackamberʼ plum (Prunus salicina Lindley) consumer acceptance. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 34: 237‒244.
  • Dimkova S., Ivanova D., Stefanova B., Marinova N., Todorova S. (2018). Chemical and technological characteristic of plum cultivars of Prunus domestica L. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 24 (2): 43–47.
  • Glišić I., Milošević N., Karaklajić-Stajić Ž., Đorđević M., Lukić M. (2018). ʻDivnaʼ – new plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivar developed at Fruit Research Institute, Čačak. Journal of Pomology. 52 (201): 7-13.
  • Glišić I.P., Milošević T., Glišić I.S., Ilić R., Paunović G., Milošević N. (2016). Tree vigour and yield of plum grown under high density planting system. Acta Horticulturae. 1139: 131–136.
  • Grzyb S.Z., Sitarek M. (2006). The influence of different rootstocks on the tree growth, yield and fruit quality of plum tree ʻDabrowice Pruneʼ planted in exhausted soil. Sodinkiste ir Daržininkiste. 25: 292–295.
  • Hartmann W., Neumüller M. (2006). Breeding for resistance: breeding for Plum pox virus resistant plums (Prunus domestica L.) in Germany. EPPO Bulletin. 36: 332‒336.
  • Jacob H.B. (2002). New plum and mirabelles varieties out of the breeding work and development in Geisenheim. Acta Horticulturae. 577: 173–176.
  • Jannatizadeh A., Naderi-Boldaji M., Fatahi R., Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M Tabatabaeefar A. (2008). Some postharvest physical properties of Iranian apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) fruit. International Agrophysics. 22 (2): 125–131.
  • Milatović D. (2019): Šljiva. Naučno voćarsko društvo Srbije, Čačak, Republika Srbija.
  • Milošević N., Đorđević M., Glišić I., Karaklajić-Stajić Ž., Lukić M., Radičević S., Marić S. (2019). ʻPetraʼ – new plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivar from Fruit Research Institute, Čačak. Journal of Pomology. 53 (205/206): 29–36.
  • Milošević N., Glišić I., Đorđević M., Radičević S., Marić S. Jevremović D. (2021). An overview of plum breeding at Fruit Research Institute, Čačak. Acta Horticulturae. 1322: 7–11.
  • Milošević N., Glišić I.S., Lukić M., Đorđević M., Karaklajić-Stajić Ž. (2016). Properties of some late season plum hybrids from Fruit Research Institute, Čačak. Conspectus Agriculturae Scientificus. 81 (2): 65–70.
  • Milošević T., Milošević N. (2018). Plum (Prunus spp.) Breeding. Published in: Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Fruits Volume 3, Al-Khayri J.M., Johnson D.V. (eds.), pp. 165–215. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.
  • Molnár A.M., Ladányi M., Kovács S. (2016). Evaluation of the production traits and fruit quality of German plum cultivars. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 64 (11): 109–114.
  • Nenadović-Mratinić E., Milatović D., Đurović D. (2007). Biological characteristics of plum cultivars with combined traits. Journal of Pomology. 41 (157/158): 31–35.
  • Neumüller M., Dittrich F., Holzapfel C. (2021). Recent achievements and future challenges in breeding for European plum cultivars: finding the suitable genetic resources for important traits. Acta Horticulturae. 1322: 1–5.
  • Schneider F. (1979). Sugar analysis. Official and tentative methods recommended by the International Commission for uniform methods of sugar analysis. ICUMSA, Peterborough, pp. 41–73.
  • Singh S.P., Singh Z. (2008). Major flavor components in some commercial cultivars of Japanese plum. Journal of American Pomological Society. 62 (4): 185–190.
  • Usenik V., Stampar F., Kastelec D. (2014). Indicators of plum maturity: When do plums become tasty? Scientia Horticulturae. 167: 127–134.
  • Vitanova I., Dinkova H., Dragojski K., Dimkova S. (2007). Biological characteristics of the growth and fruitfulness of the Bulgarian plum cultivar ʻGabrovskaʼ. Journal of Pomology. 41 (157/158): 37–40.