AUTOR(I): Dragana Glogovac, Marina Milošević, Bojan Lazić
E-ADRESA: beba.glogovac@gmail.com, marinam995@gmail.com, lazicbsaa@yahoo.com
DOI: 10.46793/NNU21.483G
SAŽETAK:
Savremenu nastavu matematike treba doživeti kao proces koji promoviše učenje sa razumevanjem, pobuđuje motivaciju, aktivno učenje, istraživanje, kritičko promišljanje, analiziranje, rešavanje problema, izvođenje zaključaka, razmenu iskustava. Tendencija unapređenja kvaliteta matematičkog obrazovanja rezultirala je mnogim studijama koje upućuju na benefite nastave matematike zasnovane na istraživanju (IN), poznato pod nazivom inquiry-based learning (IBL), prepoznatog kao bitnog načina organizovanja nastavnog procesa za razvijanje ključnih kompeten- cija, sposobnosti i veština u 21. veku.
Cilj rada je da se na bazi sveobuhvatne teorijske analize i rezultata dosadašnjih istraživanja sagledaju mogućnosti primene istraživački zasnovanog učenja u razrednoj nastavi matematike, kroz dizajniranje modela za konkretne programske sadržaje. Kreirani model nastave matematike zasnovane na istraživanju predstavlja koristan okvir za unapređivanje kvaliteta procesa nastave i učenja matematike, i osnažuje učitelje u njegovoj primeni i afirmisanju, sticanjem uvida u način organizovanja istraživačkog učenja.
KLJUČNE REČI:
matematika, razredna nastava, učenje istraživa- njem, metodički okvir.
LITERATURA:
Artigue, M. & Baptist, P. (2012). Inquiry in Mathematics Education. Bruxelles: European Commission.
Bell, R. L., Smetana, L. & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying Inquiry Instruction. National Science Teacher Association, October 2005, 30–33.
Boaler, J. (2000). Exploring Situated Insights Into Research and Learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 113–119.
Bonnsteter, R. J. (1998). Inquiry: Learning From the Past With an Eye on the Future. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(1).
Bybee, R. W. (2005). Science curriculum reform in the United States. National Academy of Sciences. In R. W. Bybee & J. D. McInerney (eds.) (1995). Redesigning the science curriculum. Colorado Springs, Colorado. (Reprint). http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg3a.htm.
Baucal, A. i Pavlović Babić, D. (2009). Kvalitet i pravednost obrazovanja u Srbiji: obrazovne šanse siromašnih. Analiza podataka PISA 2003 i 2006. Beograd: Ministarstvo prosvete Republike Srbije – Institut za psihologiju.
Bošnjak Stepanović, M. (2020). Primena istraživačke metode pri realizaciji fizičkih sadržaja u predškolskom obrazovanju i razrednoj nastavi. Som- bor: Pedagoški fakultet.
De Zan, I. (2005). Metodika nastave prirode i društva. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
Dorier, J. L. & García, F. J. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching. ZDM, 45(6), 837–849.
Gašić Pavišić, S. i Stanković, D. (2012). Obrazovna postignuća učenika iz Srbije u istraživanju TIMSS 2011. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, 44(2), 243– 265.
GLEF (George Lucas Educational Foundation) (2001). Project-based learning research. Edutopia online. Retrieved October 10, 2012 from the World Wide Web http://www.glef.org/php/article.php?id=Art_887.
Greene, M. & Renesse, C. (2016). A Path to Designing Inquiry Activities in Mathematics, PRIMUS, 27(7), 646–668.
Davыdov, V. V. (1986). Problemы razvivaющego obučeniя: opыt teoretičeskogo i эksperimentalьnogo psihologičeskogo issledovaniя [Problems of developmental teaching: conception of theoretical and experimental psychological study]. Moskva: Pedagogika.
Zerafa, I. & Gatt, S. (2014). Implementing a science curriculum reflecting an inquiry- based approach in the Upper Primary years. Published, Political Science.
Jessen, B., Doorman, M. & Bos, R. (2017). Praktični meria vodič za istraživački usmjerenu nastavu matematike, Projekt MERIA, www.meria-project.eu.
Justice, C., Rice, J. Warry, W. & Laurie, I. (2007). Taking an “Inquiry” course makes a difference: A comparative analysis of student learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 18(1), 57–77.
Kuhne, B. (1995). The Barkestorp project: Investigating school library use. School Libraries Worldwide, 1(1), 13–27.
Krugly-Smolska, E. & Taylor, P. C. (eds.) (2004). Inquiry inScience Education: International Perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.
Laudano, F., Tortoriello, S. F. & Vincenzi, G. (2019). An experience of teaching algorithms using inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(3), 344–353.
Lazonder, A. W. & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718.
Laursen, L. S., Hassi, M. L. & Hough, S. (2015). Implementation and outcomes of inquiry-based learning in mathematics content courses for pre-service teachers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(2), 256–275.
Lister, M. (2015). Gamification: The effect on student motivation and performance at the post-secondary level. Issues and Trends in Educational Tehnology, 3(2), 1–22.
Maričić, S., Špijunović, K. & Lazić, B. (2015). The influence of Content on the Development of Studentsʼ Critical Thinking in the initial Teaching of Mathematics. Croatian Journal of Education, 18(1), 11–40.
Mayer, D. Z., Kubarek-Sandor, J., Kedvesh, J., Heitzman, C., Pan, Y. & Faik, S. (2012). Eight Waysto to Do Inquiry. Science Teacher, 79(6), 40–44.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J. & Century, J. (2010). Inquirybased science instruction: What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347.
National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Noreen, R. & Khan Rana, A. M. (2019). Activity-Based Teaching versus Traditional Method of Teaching in Mathematics at Elementary Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 145–159.
Prince, M. J. & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 123–138. DOI 10.1002/ j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.
Projekat „Polen” – Dizajniranje i implementacija naučnog problema u osnovnoj školi primenom inkvajeri metoda (2011). Beograd: Prosvetni pregled.
Pavlović-Babić, D. i Baucal, A. (2013). Podrži me, Inspiriši me, PISA 2012 u Srbiji: Prvi rezultati. Beograd: Institut za psihologiju.
Pedaste, M., Baucal, A. & Reisenbuk, E. (2021). Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: development of items and scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 19.
Rezba, R. J., Auldridge, T. & Rhea, L. (1998). Teaching & learning the basic science skills. Richmond, Va.: Dept. of Education, Office of Elementary and Middle School Instructional Services.
Skoumpourdi, C. (2019). Inquiry-based implementation of a mathematical activity in a kindergarten classroom. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 11). Netherlands, Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Spronken-Smith, R. (2008). Experiencing the process of knowledge creation: The nature and use of inquiry-based learning in higher education. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago.
Stern, J., Ferraro, K. & Mohnkern, J. (2017). Tools for teaching conceptual understanding: Designing lessons and assessments for deep learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Schoenfeld, A. H. & Kilpatrick, J. (2013). A US perspective on the implementation of inquiry-based learning in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 901–909.
Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. NewYork: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H. & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi- experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.
Fisher, D., Frey, N. & Hattie, J. (2016). Visible learning for literacy grades K-12: Implementing the practices that work best to accelerate student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Harlen, W. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in science and mathematics. Review of Science. Mathematics and ICT Education, 7(2), 9–33.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of 800+ Meta-analyses on Achievement.
Routledge: Abingdon, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9198-8.
Hermann, R. S. & Miranda, R. J. (2010). A template for open inquiry. Science Teacher, 77(8), 26–30.
Hammerman, E. (2006). 8 Essentials of inquiry-based science, K-8. California: Corwin Press.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. ScienceScope, 23(6), 42–44.
Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E. & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? In O. E. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca, & C. P. Constantinou (eds.): Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning (1–23). Cham, Switzerland: Springer
Chowdhury, R. (2017). Inquiry Based Learning as an Instructional Strategy to Increase Student Achievement in Math and Science. Retrieved March 28, 2021 from the World Wide Web https://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/proceedings16/2016i/16_04.pdf.
Wang, F. F., Kinzie, M. B., McGuire, P. & Pan, E. (2010). Applying Technology to Inquiry-Based Learning in Early Childhood Education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 381–389.
Wu, S. C. & Lin, F. L. (2016). Inquiry-Based Mathematics Curriculum Design for Young Children-Teaching Experiment and Reflection. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 843–860.