ANALIZA ORVELOVIH POGLEDA NA IDEJE SOCIJALIZMA U „ŽIVOTINJSKOJ FARMI“ I „1984“.

Lipar 74 (2021), (str. 67-85)

AUTOR(I): Pavle Antonijević

E-ADRESA: antantonijevic.pavle@gmail.com

Download Full Pdf 

DOI: 10.46793/LIPAR74.067A

SAŽETAK:

Rad ima za predmet analizu poslednja dva književna dela Džordža Orvela, Životinjsku farmu i 1984, iz ugla ispitivanja njegovih političkih uverenja. Dela o kojima je reč, ostala su obeležena prvenstveno kao oštre osude staljinizma i totalitarnih mehanizama vlasti, odnosno svojevrsna opomena potomstvu o mogućnostima potpunog pokoravanja slobode i individualnosti. Ipak, ovaj rad se ne bavi Orvelovom kritikom totalitarizma, već mu je cilj da preispita ona mesta u delu u kojima se mogu pratiti stavovi Džordža Orvela prema teorijskom socijalizmu, kao i njegov pogled na kapitalizam i liberalnu demokratiju. Paralelno su analizirani stavovi iz Životinjske farme i 1984, sa ciljem da se ispita da li je došlo do promene u književnom pristupu autora kada je reč o pomenutim temama, pri čemu je uzet u obzir različiti karakter ova dva dela. Uz Orvelova dela, kao primarne izvore, istraživanje se oslanja na noviju literaturu koja se bavi odnosom Džordža Orvela prema socijalizmu. Istraživanjem je utvrđeno da je Orvel u oba književna dela, koja     su bila predmet istraživanja, zadržao svoja politička uverenja, odnosno privrženost demokratskom socijalizmu. Ova doslednost, praćena kritikom kapitalizma, posebno je uočljiva u Životinjskoj farmi, usled drugačijeg karaktera tog dela, ali je ona prisutna i u 1984. Zaključak je da je Orvelovo delo, usled diskursa koji je tokom Hladnog rata formiran na Zapadu, pojednostavljivano, pri čemu nije u dovoljnoj meri naglašavana stvarna ideološka pozadina autora koja je bitno uticala na njegovo stvaralaštvo.

KLJUČNE REČI:

Džordž Orvel, Životinjska farma, Hiljadu devesto osamdeset četvrta, demokratski socijalizam, kapitalizam, staljinizam, liberalizam

LITERATURA:

Albloli, Alusami 2019: A. M, Albloly, M, A. A. H. Alhusami, “George Orwell’s Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty Four as Timeless Scenarios: A Political Perspective”, European Academic Research 7 (9/2019): 4627–4642.

Baunds 2009: P. Bounds, Orwell and Marxism. The Political and Cultural Thinking of George Orwell, London-New York: I.B. Tauris-Co Ltd.

Bernham 1941: Burnham, James. The Managerial Revolution: What is Happening in the World. New York: John Day Co, 1941.

Bovker 2003: G. Bowker, George Orwell, London: Hachette Digital.

Vajt 2008: R. White, “George Orwell: Socialism and Utopia“, Utopian Studies 19 (1/2008): 73–95.

Vorner 1983: J. Warner, Liberalism and Marxism in the Work of George Orwell. Doktorska disertacija, Oxford University.

Dikstejn 2007: M. Dickstein, “Animal Farm: history as fable“, in John Rodden (edited by), The Cambridge Companion to George Orwell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 133–145.

Živković 2009: D. Živković, „Nametnuti identitet u romanu 1984. Džordža Orvela”, u Vesna Lopičić, Biljana Mišić Ilić (urednici), Jezik, književnost, identitet. Zbornik radova, Niš: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu, 194–201.

Kar 2010: C. L, Carr, Orwell, Politics and Power, New York: Continuum.

Klark 2001: B. Clarke, ”Orwell and the Evolution of Utopian Writing“, in Alberto Lazaro (edited by), The Road From Georgy Orwell: His Achievement and Legacy, Bern: Peter Lang, 225–250.

Krik 1980: B. Crick, George Orwell: A Life, Toronto: Sutherland House.

Krik 2007: B. Crick, “Nineteen Eighty-Four: context and controversy”, in John Rodden (edited by), The Cambridge Companion to George Orwell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 146–160.

Lirs 1985: T. J. Lears, “The Concept of Cultural Hegemony: Problems and Possibilities“, The American Historical Review 90 (3/1985): 567–593.

Litman 2018: G. Littmann, “Why Don’t the Proles Just Take Over?“, in Ezio Di Nucci and Stefan Storrie (edited by), 1984 and Philosophy: Is Resistance Futile?, Chicago: Open Court, 42–54

Njusinger 1999: J. Newsinger, Orwell’s Politics. New York: Palgrave.

Njusinger 2018: J. Newsinger, Hope Lies in the Proles. George Orwell and the Left, London: Pluto Press.

Pimlot: The Orwell Foundation: B. Pimlott, “Introduction to Nineteen Eighty-Four”, ‹ https://www.orwellfoundation.com›09.06.2021.

Reš 1997: R. P. Resch, “Utopia, Dystopia, and the Middle Class in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four“, Boundary 2 24 (1/1997): 137–176.

Rivs 1984: R. B. Reaves, “Orwell’s “Second Thoughts on James Burnham” and 1984”, College Literature 11 (1/1984): 13–21.

Roden 2020: J. Rodden, Becoming George Orwell. Life and Letters, Legend and Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rosi, Roden 2007: J. Rossi, J. Rodden, “A political writer“, in John Rodden (edited by), The Cambridge Companion to George Orwell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–12.

Sen 2015: S. Senn, “All Propaganda is Dangerous, but Some are More Dangerous than Others: George Orwell and the Use of Literature as Propaganda”, Journal of Strategic Security 8 (3/2015): 149–161.

Firšov 2007: P. E. Firchow, Modern Utopian Fictions: from H. G. Wells to Iris Murdoch, Washington. D. C: The Catholic University of America Press.

Hendriks, Vestergard 2018: F. V. Hendricks, M. Vestergaard, “Post-Factual Democracy“, in Ezio Di Nucci and Stefan Storrie (edited by), 1984 and Philosophy: Is Resistance Futile?, Chicago: Open Court, 273–286.

Hobsbaum: The Orwell Foundation: E. Hobsbawm, “Intellectuals and The Spanish Civil War“, ‹ https://www.orwellfoundation.com›09.06.2021. (tekst je objavljen kao skraćeno poglavlje iz knjige: Hobsbawm, Eric, Revolutionaries. Abacus: London 2007)

Džordan 2009: J. Jordan. “The Unsung Artistry of George Orwell: The Novels from Burmese Days to Nineteen Eighty-Four” , The Modern Language Review, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 852–854.