Razvoj shvatanja uloge i vrednosti likovnog obrazovanja u opštem obrazovanju

Uzdanica XXI II (2024) (str. 285-295)

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Jovana N. Đorđević

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/Uzdanica21.2.285DJ

SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:

U radu je dat pregled različitih teorija koje su imale ulogu u pozicioniranju likovnog obrazovanja unutar opšteg obrazovanja najpre u okvirima Zapadne Evrope i Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, a zatim i u ostalim delovima Evrope. Kao početna tačka ovog pregleda uzima se period 19. veka. Predstavljena su razmatranja relevantnih evropskih i američkih autora (pedagoga, psihologa i teoretičara umetničkog obrazovanja tokom 20. i 21. veka) o vrednostima likovnog obrazovanja u opštem obrazovanju. Istaknut je i uticaj psiholoških teorija (biheviorizam i konstruktivizam), sociokulturne teorije i umetničke prakse na shvatanje uloge i zadataka likovnog obrazovanja. U završnom delu rada izlažu se nova razmatranja i preispitivanja teorija likovnog obrazovanja 20. veka u diskursu postmodernizma. Istovremeno se ukazuje na nedovršenu polemiku o ulozi i potrebnim pristupima likovnom obrazovanju u savremenom kontekstu i podržava se nastavak istraživanja i diskusije u ovoj oblasti.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:

likovno obrazovanje, umetnost u opštem obrazovanju, biheviorizam, sociokulturna teorija, konstruktivizam, postmodernizam.

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • Ajzner (2002): E. Eisner, The Arts and the Creation of Mind, New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  • Arnhajm (1998): R. Arnhajm, Umetnost i vizuelno opažanje. Psihologija stvaralačkog gledanja, Beograd: Univerzitet umetnosti u Beogradu i Studentski kulturni centar.
  • Atkinson (2002). D. Atkinson, Art in Education: Identity and Practice, Kluwer Academic publishers.
  • Bresler (2007): L. Bresler, Introduction, In: L. Bresler (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, Springer, xvii–xxiv.
  • Gardner (1983): H. Gardner, Artistic Intelligences, Art Education, 36(2), 47–49.
  • Hadži-Jovančić (2012): N. Hadži-Jovančić, Umetnostiuopštem obrazovanju. Funkcijeipristupi nastavi, Beograd: Klet.
  • Efland (1990): A. Efland, A History of Art Education. Intellectual and Social Currents in Teaching the Visual Arts, Teachers College Press.
  • Efland (1995): A. Efland, The Spiral and The Lattice: Changes in Cognitive Learning Theory with Implications for Art Education, Studies in Art Education, 36(3), 134–153.
  • Efland (2004): A. Efland, The Arts and the Creation of Mind: Eisner’s Contributions to the Arts in Education, The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(4), 71–80.
  • Kindler (2010): A. Kindler, Art and art in Early Childhood: What Can Young Children Learn from “a/Art activities?”, International Art in Early Childhood Research Journal, 2(1).
  • Koks (2007): G. Cox, Some crossing points in curriculum history, History of Education and Arts Education, In: L. Bresler (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, Springer, 3–6.
  • Noton, Kol (2018): C. Naughton, D. Cole, Philosophy and pedagogy in arts education, In C. Naughton, G. Biesta, D. R. Cole (Eds.), Art, Artists and Pedagogy. Philosophy and the Arts in Education, Routledge, 1–10.
  • Perkins (1994): D. Perkins, The Intelligent Eye: Learning to Think by Looking at Art, The Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
  • Salivan (1993): G. Sullivan, Art-Based Art Education: Learning That Is Meaningful, Authentic, Critical and Pluralist, Studies in Art Education, 35(1), 5–21.
  • UNESCO (2020): https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-celebrates-power-art-and-education-across-globe