OSPORENI SUVERENITET: KOPNENA ZONA BEZBEDNOSTI KAO GEOPOLITIČKO POGRANIČJE

Naučna konferencija Transformacija prostora Kopnene zone bezbednosti, 5. novembar 2025. Beograd, (185-193 str.)

 

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Mihajlo Kopanja

 

Download Full Pdf   

DOI:  10.46793/80029.90.0.185K

SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:

U radu se posmatra prostor Kopnene zone bezbednosti (KZB-a) iz geopolitičke perspektive. Iako je potpisivanjem vojno-tehničkog sporazuma u Kumanovu, Srbija prepustila međunarodnoj zajednici faktičku kontrolu nad prostorom Autonomne pokrajine Kosova i Metohije (AP KiM), i time „osporila“ sopstveni suverenitet, isto se može reći i za prostor KZB-a. Na ovom području suverenitet Srbije je takođe bio osporen, ali implikacije osporenog suvereniteta nisu bile detaljnije proučavane. Centralna teza ovog rada jeste da je osporeni suverenitet postojao i da na neki način i dalje postoji i na prostoru KZB-a, s obzirom da Zona predstavlja svojevrsno geopolitičko pograničje (borderlands). Srž osporenog suvereniteta u KZB-u proizilazi iz činjenice da je reč o geopolitičkom pograničju koji počiva na hibridnom bezbednosnom poretku u kojem je ipak postojao svojevrsni bezbednosni vakuum. Taj vakuum nije proizvod nemogućnosti za njenom kontrolom već specifičnog pravnog poretka nametnutog uslovima međudržavnog tehničkog sporazuma kojim je zaustavljena NATO agresija na tadašnju SR Jugoslaviju.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:

Kopnena zona bezbednosti; pograničje; osporeni suverenitet; geopolitika; politička geografija

PROJEKAT / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • Vlada Republike Srbije. (1999). Vojno-tehnički sporazum. https://www.srbija.gov.rs/kosovometohija/?id=19947
  • Kopanja, M. (2023). Nenameran sukob: ovakav rusko-ukrajinski rat (zapravo) niko nije planirao. U: N. Vuković i M. Kopanja (Ur.), Rat u Ukrajini: ono što znamo i ono što ne znamo (str. 97–111). Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu i Fakultet bezbednosti.
  • Milošević, M. V. (2023). Geopatologija Kopnene zone bezbednosti. https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/580126/ pogledi/geopatologija-kopnene-zone-bezbednosti
  • Tomić, M. (2022). Ugrožavanje nacionalne bezbednosti secesijom teritorija sa raspoloživim prirodnim resursima: slučaj Srbije, Ukrajine i Španije. [Doktorska disertacija]. Beograd: Fakultet bezbednosti.

* * *

  • Assanbayev, M., Talha, M., & Murtaza, M. (2025). The Afghan-Pakistan Borderlands and Their Impact on Pakistan’s Security. Journal of Central Asian Studies, 23(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.52536/3006807X.2025-2.002
  • Beurskens, K., & Miggelbrink, J. (2017). Special Section Introduction– Sovereignty Contested: Theory and Practice in Borderlands. Geopolitics, 22(4), 749–756, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1373582
  • Blair, C. W. (2023). The Fortification Dilemma: Border Control and Rebel Violence. American Journal of Political Science, 68(4), 1366–1385. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12794
  • Brozović, Z. (2012). Teritorijalni i granični sporovi na Zapadnom Balkanu: Studija slučaja teritorijalni i sporovi oko administrativne linije između Srbije i Kosova. Beogradski centar za bezbednosnu politiku.
  • Colibasanu, A. (2023). Geopolitics, Geoeconomics and Borderlands: A Study of a Changing Eurasia and Its implications for Europe. Springer.
  • Darques, R. (2017). Mapping Versatile Boundaries: Understanding the Balkans. Springer.
  • Florea, A., & Huang, R. (2025). Functional Sovereignty in Contested Territories. International Studies Quarterly, (69)4, sqaf069. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf069
  • Golić, R., & Joksimović, M. (2013). Napuštena sela Srbije: Studija slučaja sela Vukojevac (opština Kuršumlija)”, U: V. Šećerov, D. S. Đorđević, Z. Radosavljević i M. R. Jeftić (Ur.), Lokalna samouprava u planiranju i uređenju prostora i naselja (s. 241–248). Asocijacija prostornih planera Srbije i Geografski fakultet.
  • Goodman, N. P. (2024). Border militarization and domestic institutions. Constitutional Political Econonomy, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-024-09440-5
  • Grande, E., & Pauly, L. W. (2005). Complex Sovereignty and the Emergence of Transnational Authority. U E. Grande & L. W. Pauly (Ur.), Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-First Century (s. 285–300). University of Toronto Press.
  • Hollstegge, J., & Doevenspeck, M. (2017). ‘Sovereignty Entrepreneurs’ and the Production of State Power in Two Central African Borderlands. Geopolitics, 22(4), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1359160
  • Idler, A., & McGill, D. (2024). Secession or Sense of Belonging? Marginalization in the Context of Transnationality International Political Sociology, 18(4), olae044. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olae044
  • Johnson, C. (2017). Competing Para-Sovereignties in the Borderlands of Europe. Geopolitics, 22(4), 772–793. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1314962
  • Kelly, P. (2006). A critique of critical geopolitics. Geopolitics, 11(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500524053
  • Kopanja, M. (2021). Geopolitički pristupi regionalnoj bezbednosti. U N. Šekarić i V. Trapara (Ur.), Regionalna bezbednost: pristupi, elementi, dinamika (s. 71–100). Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu.
  • Kopanja, M., Nedić, P. (2022). The World is Not a Blank Canvas: or Why Should We Teach Political Geography. International Problems, 74(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.3726/b17747
  • Krasner, S. D. (2001). Problematic Sovereignty, U: S. D. Krasner (Ur.), Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities (pp. 1–23). Columbia University Press.
  • Kraudzun, T. (2017). Sovereignty as a Resource: Performing Securitised Borders in Tajikistan’s Pamirs. Geopolitics, 22(4), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1284817
  • Lapidus, G. W. (1998). Contested Sovereignty: The Tragedy of Chechnya. International Security, 23(1), 5–49. https://doi. org/10.2307/2539261
  • Luzzu, J. (2024). Contested Borderlands: Experimental Governance and Statecraft in the Laos Golden Triangle Special Economic Zone. Social Sciences, 13(10), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13100500
  • Martinez, O. J. (1994). Border people: Life and society in the US-Mexico borderlands. University of Arizona Press.
  • Megoran, N. (2006). For ethnography in political geography: Experiencing and reimagining Ferghana Valley boundary closures. Political Geography, 25(6), 622–640.
  • Mincytė, D., & Blumberg, R. (2024). Family farms through the lens of geopolitics: rethinking agency and power in the Baltic borderlands. Agric Hum Values 41, 1317–1333.
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460024-10613-z
  • Mojsilović, Ž. (2013). Uloga nevladinog sektora u rešavanju kriza i konflikata. Megatrend revija, 10(4), 193–210. https:// scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=1820-31591304193M
  • Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113
  • Nicol, H. N. (2017). From territory to rights: New foundations for conceptualising indigenous sovereignty. Geopolitics, 22(4), 794–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1264055
  • Opioła, W. (2014). Border in the theory of borderlands. Border and Regional Studies, 2(1), 35–43. https://doi. org/10.25167/ppbs621
  • Peña, S. (2021). Borderlands, frontiers, and borders: Changing meanings and the intersection with smuggling practices. U: M. Gallien i F. Weigand (Ur.), The Routledge Handbook of Smuggling (s. 107-117). Routledge.
  • Popović, Đ. (2007). Žandarmerija ili lokalna multietnička policija?. Bezbednost Zapadnog Balkana, 4, 45–53. https:// www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=159189
  • Sikavica, S. (2008). ‘Apsurdi`, iluzije, realnost. Helsinška povelja, 125–126, 23–24. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=126804
  • Stevanović, O., Sijalković, S., Subošić, D., & Mlađan, D. (2012). Prevencija etnički motivisanog terorizma u Republici Srbiji – Studija slučaja Bujanovac, Preševo i Medveđa. Teme, 36(4), 1701–1717.
  • https://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=0353-79191204701S
  • Strang, D. (1996). Contested sovereignty: the social construction of colonial imperialism. U Biersteker TJ, Weber C, (Ur.),
  • State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge Studies in International Relations (s. 22–49). Cambridge University Press.
  • Ó. Tuathail, G. (1999). Understanding critical geopolitics: Geopolitics and risk society. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 22(2–3), 107–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402399908437756
  • Voller, Y. (2013). Contested sovereignty as an opportunity: understanding democratic transitions in unrecognized states. Democratization, 22(4), 610–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.856418
  • Wilson, T. M., & Hastings, D. (2012). Borders and border studies. U: T.M. Wilson & H. Donnan (Ur.). A companion to border studies (1-25). New York: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Zou, F., Bhuiyan, M. A., Crovella, T., & Paiano, A. (2023). Analyzing the Borderlands: A Regional Report on the Colombia–Ecuador Border on Political, Economic, Social, Legal, and Environment Aspects. International Migration Review, 58(2), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183221149019