PRETRAŽIVANJE TEKSTA I PODATAKA U SVRHU NAUČNOG ISTRAŽIVANJA – STANJE U EU I SAD

XXI Majsko savetovanje (2025) SAVREMENO PRAVO U ERI DIGITALIZACIJE I ODRŽIVOG RAZVOJA (739-755 str.)

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Njegoslav Jović  

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/XXIMajsko.739J

SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:

Prikupljanjepodatakajekarakteristikasvakognaučnogistraživanja. Danas, udobadigitalnetehnologijeprikupljanjepodatakaputeminternetakoristećimoćkompjuteraivještačkuinteligencijumodernihalgoritamaolakšavanaučnoistraživanje. Međutim, postojiproblemjerovakvimpretraživanjemiskupljanjempodatakadolazidopovredeautorskogprava. Izradomkopijatokomanalizapretraživanjatekstaipodatakamožedadođedopovredeautorskogprava. Međutim, overadnjemogubitidozvoljenenaosnovuizuzetkailiograničenjaautorskogprava. Povredanepostojiuslučajuprikupljanjazvaničnihdržavnihdokumenataizakonskihtekstovakaoidjelakojanisupodautorskomzaštitom.

Pretraživanjetekstaipodatakajeterminkojisekoristizaoznačavanjeraznihanalitičkihalatakojiseobičnobazirajunakorišćenjedigitalnihtehnologija, velikihpodatakaiinterneta. Pretraživanjetekstaipodatakadopuštastvaranjenovihznanjaizbilokojevrsteinformacija, kaoštosutekstovi, slike, zvukoviilibazepodatakakojisečestostvarajuudrugesvrhe. Naovajnačinomogućavasekorelacijanajrazličitijihskupovainformacijekombinovanjempodatakakojiseinačenikadanebibilikombinovani.

CiljovogradajesteistraživanjedalipropisiEU, tačnijevažećaDirektiva(EU) 2019/790 EvropskogparlamentaiSavjetaod17. aprila2019. oautorskimisrodnimpravimanajedinstvenomdigitalnomtržištuiizmjeniDirektive96/9/EZi2001/29/EZipropisiSAD-aomogućavajuefikasnobalansiranjeizmeđuinteresapromovisanjainovacijaizaštiteinvesticijakaoiinteresanosiocaautorskogprava.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:

pretraživanjetekstaipodataka, naučnoistraživanje, autorskopravo, digitalizacija.

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • Borghi, M., Text&DataMining, https://www.copyrightuser.org/understand/exceptions/text-data-mining/, 03.05.2025.
  • Gaćinović, R., Prikupljanjepodatakauprocesunaučnogistraživanja, Politička revija, br. 2/2017.
  • Geiger, C., Frosio, G., Bulayenko, O., Theexception forTextandData Mining (TDM)inthe Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market Legal Aspects, Center for International Intellectual Property Studies Research Paper, No. 02/2018.
  • Marković, M. S., Autorskoisrodnaprava, Beograd, 1999.
  • Margoni, T., Kretschmer, M., The Text and Data Mining exception in the Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Why it is not what EU copyright law needs, 2019.
  • Margoni, T., Dore, G., Why We Need a Text and Data Mining Exception (But it is Not Enough), 2019.
  • Miljević, I. M., Metodologijanaučnograda, Pale, 2007. McDonald, D., Kelly, U., Value and Benefit of Text Mining, JISC, 2012.
  • Muto, G. S.,, ANewTextandDataMiningExceptionRestrictivevs.extensiveinterpretations ofcopyrightlimitation, Master Thesis (2016/17), Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC), Munich, 2017.
  • Radovanović, S., Otvorenanaukaiautorskopravo, sposebnimosvrtomnaprijedlogdirektiveEUoautorskompravunajedinstvenomdigitalnomtržištu, Zbornik radova: Intelektualna svojina i internet, Beograd, 2018.
  • Radovanović, S., Upotrebaračunarskogprogramaucloudcomputing-u, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, br. 3/2013.
  • Radovanović, S., Tehnološkemereusistemuzaštiteautorskogprava, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, br. 1/2011.
  • Sag, M., The New Legal Landscape for Text Mining and Machine Learning, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, No. 66/2019.
  • Spasić, Ž. V., Autorskadelaudigitalnomokruženju, Niš, 2011.
  • Stamatoudi, I., Textand DataMining, u New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law (ed. Irini Stamatoudi), Kluwer Law International, Leiden, 2016.
  • Handke, C., Guibault, L., Vallbé, J-J., IsEuropeFallingBehindinDataMining?Copyright’s Impact onDataMiningin Academic Research, u New Avenues for Electronic Publishing in the Age of Infinite Collections and Citizen Science: Scale, Openness and Trust, (eds. B. Schmidt, M. Dobreva), proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Amsterdam 2015.
  • Hearst, A. M., Untangling Text Data Mining, Proceedings of ACL’99: the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1999.
  • Hilty, R. M., Richter, H., PositionStatementoftheMaxPlanckInstituteforInnovationand Competitionon theProposed Modernisation ofEuropean CopyrightRules, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper No. 17-02, 2017.
  • Quintais, J. P., TheNewCopyrightintheDigitalSingleMarketDirective:ACriticalLook, European Intellectual Property Review, 2019.
  • Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC, OJ L130.
  • Directive 2009/24/EC of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs, OJ L111/16.
  • Directive 2001/29/EC of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, OJ L167/10.
  • Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, OJ L77/20.
  • Zakon br. 2016-1231 za Digitalnu Republiku (Loi pour une République numérique).
  • Zakon o autorskim pravima Estonije.
  • Zakon o autorskim i srodnim pravima Njemačke (Urheberrechtsgesetz). Kodeks intelektualne svojine (Codede lapropriété intellectuelle) (CPI).
  • Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (UK).
  • 17 U.S. Code § 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use.
  • A.V. ex rel. Vanderhye v. iParadigms, LLC, 562 F.3d 630, 645 (4th Cir. 2009). Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202, 221 (2nd Cir. 2015).
  • Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust, 755 F. 3d 87, 99. (2d Cir. 2014).
  • Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc., 954 F. Supp. 2d 282, 291 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust, 902 F. Supp. 2d 445, 460 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Ltd., 448 F.3d 605 (2d Cir. 2006). Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994).
  • NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Institute, 364 F.3d 471, 482 (2d Cir. 2004).
  • Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd, 2013 UKSC.
  • Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc., 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992).
  • Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp., 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000). C-5/08, InfopaqInternationalA/Sv.DanskeDagbladesForening.
  • C-302/10, InfopaqInternationalA/Sv.DanskeDagbladesForening. Wright v. Warner Books, Inc., 953 F.2d 731 (2d Cir. 1991).