Process Optimization of Alcoholic Fermentation for Enhanced Bioethanol Yield

11th International Scientific Conference Technics, Informatics and Education – TIE 2026, (pp. 323-334)

 

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Nevena Vukić , Darko Manjenčić , Marijana Vasić , Milica Ivanović , Predrag Pravdić , Dejan Todorović  and Miodrag Pergal  

 

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/TIE26.329V

SAŽETAK /ABSTRACT:

The high consumption and exhaustion of fossil fuels in recent years due to industry and technology development has led to finding an alternative solution. Among alternative energy resources, biofuels today are a significant place, of which bioethanol has a special place as a renewable and environmentally convenient fuel. In the production of bioethanol, it is significant that it can be obtained by fermentation from renewable raw materials containing carbohydrates. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal combination of microorganism and temperature regime to achieve maximum bioethanol yield, while minimizing energy losses and reducing fermentation time. The presence of the produced bioethanol was confirmed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Additionally, the chemical structure of ethanol and carbohydrates was investigated and verified via Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), which successfully identified the characteristic functional groups. This paper investigates the effect of temperature on the fermentation process of ethanol production from cassava, using hydrolyzed starch as the carbohydrate source, with yeast cultivated on Sabouraud Maltose Agar. This study thus revealed that a temperature of 30°C and a pH of 4.8 proved most suitable for the fermentation process, resulting in a bioethanol yield of approximately 30% from both glucose and maltose syrups.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS: 

Bioethanol; alcoholic fermentation; temperature; ethanol yield; process optimization

PROJEKAT / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, and these results are part of the Grant No. 451-03-33/2026-03/200132.

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • Vučurović, D. (2015). Model bioprocesa proizvodnje etanola iz među-i nusproizvoda prerade šećerne repe. Doctoral thesis, Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad.
  • Šljivac, D. (2008). Obnovljivi izvori energije, Energija biomase. Falcuty of Electrical Engineering, Osijek.
  • Jesús T. (2003). Effects of fermentation temperature on the strain population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 80(1), 47-53. doi.org/10.1016/S01681605(02)00144-7
  • Liang Z. (2008). Interruption of glycerol pathway in industrial alcoholic yeasts to improve the ethanol production, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 82(2), 287-92, doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1777-7
  • Andery, V. G., et al. (2019). The mechanisms of biochar interactions with microorganisms in soil. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 42(8), 2495-2518.
  • Cunha-Pereira, F., et al. (2017). Fermentation of hexoses and pentoses from hydrolyzed soybean hull into ethanol and xylitol. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 34(4), 927-936.
  • Kemka, H. O., et al. (2013). Effect of temperature and pH on ethanol production by a Blastomyces species isolated from the intestine of oil palm weevil. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12(6), 588-591.
  • Aysun, F., et al. (2016). The effect of fermentation temperature on the growth kinetics of wine yeast species. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 42(5), 349-354.
  • Arora, P. (2026). Next generation sustainable bioethanol solutions: Microbial and technological innovations for a greener planet. Biofuels and Bioproducts from Lignocellulosic Materials, 139-172. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-21527-8.00003-4
  • Chang, D., et al. (2021). Inhibitor tolerance and bioethanol fermentability of levoglucosan-utilizing Escherichia coli were enhanced by overexpression of stress-responsive gene ycfR: The proteomics-guided metabolic engineering. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology, 6(4), 384-395. doi:10.1016/j.synbio.2021.11.003.