PASIVNE KONSTRUKCIJE U ROMANU O TROJI

Mladi filolozi I (2025)[43-59]

AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Luka Z. Nikolić

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/MFXVI-1.043N

ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:

Predmet ovog rada jesu pasivne konstrukcije u starosrpskom prepisu Romana o Troji. Nakon obimnijeg teorijskog uvoda i koncipiranja kategorije pasiva, analizu empirijske građe započećemo ispitivanjem morfosintaksičkih odlika participskog i refleksivnog pasiva. Fokus naše analize predstavljaće funkcije ovih pasivnih konstrukcija na planu informativne strukture teksta, kao i na planu diskursne motivacije zamenjivanja neutralnog aktiva pasivom. Dobijene rezultate i uočene distinktivne karakteristike oba tipa pasivnih konstrukcija prokomentarisaćemo uz kratak osvrt na komparativno-istorijsku ravan slovenskih jezika.

KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI:

pasiv, dijateza, participski pasiv, pasivni particip, refleksivni pasiv, refleksivni marker, starosrpski jezik, Roman o Troji.

REFERENCES / LITERATURA:

Izvori
  • Ringhajm 1951: A. Ringheim, Eine altserbische Trojasage, Prague – Upsal: Imprimerie de l`état à Prague.
  • SVK 2022: Serbian Web Corpus PDRS 1.0, , 15. 6. 2024.
Literatura
  • Alanović 2019: M. Alanović, O dopunama i dopunjavanju u srpskom jeziku, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.
  • Arka i Ros 2005: I W. Arka & M. Ross (eds.), The many faces of Austronesian voice systems: Some new empirical studies, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
  • Belić 1998: A. Belić, Opšta lingvistika: O jezičkoj prirodi i jezičkom razvitku, knj. 1 i 2, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
  • Benvenist 1966: É. Benveniste, Problèmes de linguistique générale, Paris: Gallimard.
  • Vimer 2017: B. Wiemer, Slavic resultatives and their extensions: Integration into the aspect system and the role of telicity, Slavia, vol. 86(2–3), 124–168.
  • Givon 1981: T. Givón, Typology and functional domains, Studies in Language, vol. 5(2), 163–193.
  • Givon 2001: T. Givón, Syntax, vol. 2, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Dankov 1981: V. N. Dankov, Istoričeskaя grammatika russkogo яzыka. Vыraženie zalogovыh otnošeniй u glagola, Moskva: Vыsšaя škola.
  • Zunjiga i Kitila 2019: F. Zúñiga & S. Kittilä, Grammatical voice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ivić 1998: P. Ivić, Pregled istorije srpskog jezika, Sremski Karlovci – Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
  • Ingleze 2021: G. Inglese, Towards a typology of middle voice systems, Linguistic Typology, , 15. 6. 2024.
  • Kemer 1993: S. Kemmer, The middle voice, Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Kinan i Drajer 2007: E. Keenan & M. Dryer, Passive in the world’s languages, in: T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 325–361.
  • Klajman 1991: M. H. Klaiman, Grammatical voice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kozinski i dr. 1988: I. Kozinsky, V. Nedjalkov & M. Polinskaja, Antipassive in Chukchee: Oblique object, object incorporation, zero object, in: M. Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 651–706.
  • Kolins 2005: C. Collins, A smuggling approach to the passive in English, Syntax, vol. 8, 81–120.
  • Kulikov 2010: L. Kulikov, Voice typology, in: J. J. Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 368–398.
  • Lajons 1968: J. Lyons, Introduction to theoretical linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge
    University Press.
  • Majer 2010: R. Meyer, Reflexive passives and impersonals in North Slavonic languages: A diachronic view, Russian Linguistics, vol. 34(3), 285–306.
  • Makintajer 2013: A. McIntyre, Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English, in: A. Alexiadou & F. Schäfer (eds.), Non-canonical passives, Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 21–41.
  • Malicka-Kleparska 2016: A. Malicka-Kleparska, Old Church Slavonic as a language with the middle voice morphology, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 13(2), 215–230.
  • Meljčuk 1993: I. Mel’čuk, The inflectional category of voice: Towards a more rigorous definition, in: B. Comrie & M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–46.
  • Milošević 1972: K. Milošević, Neki aspekti semantičkog odnosa konstrukcija pasivne (sa trpnim pridjevom) i refleksivne u savremenom srpskohrvatskom jeziku, Književni jezik, br. 1(3–4), 63–96.
  • Milošević 1973: K. Milošević, Temporalno značenje i sintaksička vrijednost konstrukcija Cop (praes. perf.) – part. pass. u srpskohrvatskom jeziku, Južnoslovenski filolog, br. 30(1–2), 423–437.
  • Milošević 1974: K. Milošević, Uloga imperfektivnog vida i nekih drugih semantičkih elemenata glagolskog značenja u semantičkom konstituisanju i interpretaciji jednog tipa predikata: konstrukcija Cop (praes) + part. pass. (V impf), Zbornik za filologiju i lingvistiku, br. 17(1), 139–171.
  • Nedjalkov i Siljnicki 1973: V. Nedjalkov & G. Sil’nickij, The typology of morphological and lexical causatives, in: F. Kiefer (ed.), Trends in Soviet theoretical linguistics, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1–32.
  • Pergler 2014: J. Pergler, K funkcím staročeského reflexiva sě, Časopis pro moderní filologii, vol. 96, 27–41.
  • Piper 2004: P. Piper, Semantičke kategorije u prostoj rečenici: sintaksička semantika, u: P. Piper (ured.), Sintaksa savremenoga srpskog jezika: prosta rečenica, Beograd: Institut za srpski jezik SANU – Beogradska knjiga – Matica srpska, 575–982.
  • Silverstajn 1972: M. Silverstein, Chinook Jargon: Language contact and the problem of multilevel generative systems, vol. 1, Language, vol. 48(2), 378–406.
  • Stevanović 1961–1962: M. Stevanović, Problem glagolskog roda i povratni glagoli u srpskohrvatskom jeziku, Južnoslovenski filolog, br. 25, 1–47.
  • Haspelmat 1990: M. Haspelmath, The grammaticization of passive morphology, Studies in Language, vol. 14(1), 25–72.
  • Haspelmat 2003: M. Haspelmath, The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison, in: M. Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language, vol. 2, Mahwah – London: Erlbaum, 211–242.
  • Haspelmat 2011: M. Haspelmath, On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology, Linguistic Typology, vol. 15(3), 535–568.
  • Hoper i Tompson 1980: P. Hopper & S. Thompson, Transitivity in grammar and discourse, Language, vol. 56(2), 251–299.
  • Čomski 1957: N. Chomsky, Syntactic structures, The Hague: Mouton.
  • Čomski 1981: N. Chomsky, Lectures on government and binding, Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Šibatani 1985: M. Shibatani, Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis, Language, vol. 61(4), 821–848.