Липар 90 (2026) (107-121 стр.)
АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Mirjana M. Mišković-Luković 
Download Full Pdf 
DOI: 10.46793/LIPAR90.107ML
САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:
Couched within the relevance-theoretic, cognitive-inferential, framework, this paper aims at providing a comparative analysis of the cognitive (i.e. linguistic semantic and pragmatic) configurations and roles of the linguistic expressions you see, you know and actually, which have come to be used as discourse markers. A further, derivative, aim pertains to highlighting their similarities and differences in manipulative types of ordinary conversational exchanges.
КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:
discourse markers, manipulation, relevance theory, semantics/pragmatics interface, utterance interpretation
ПРОЈЕКАТ / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The research in this paper was funded according to the Agreement on the transfer of funds for financing the scientific research work of teaching staff at accredited higher education institutions in 2026 (451-03-34/2026-03/ 200198).
ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:
- Blakemore 1987: D. Blakemore, Semantic constraints on relevance, Oxford: Blackwell.
- Blakemore 1996: D. Blakemore, Understanding utterances: An introduction to pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell.
- Brown, Levinson 1988: P. Brown, S. C. Levinson, Politeness: Some universals in language usage, Cambridge: CUP.
- Carston 2002: R. Carston, Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication, Oxford: Blackwell.
- Chang, Mehan 2006: G. C. Chang, H. B. Mehan, Discourse in a religious mode: The Bush administration’s discourse in the war on terrorism and its challenges, Pragmatics 16 (1), 1-23.
- Grice 1989: P. H. Grice, Studies in the way of words, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Ifantidou 2000: E. Ifantidou, Procedural encoding of explicatures by the Modern Greek particle taha, in: G. Andersen and T. Fretheim (eds), Pragmatic markers and propositional attitude, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119-143.
- Mišković-Luković 2006: M. Mišković-Luković, Semantika i pragmatika iskaza: markeri diskursa u engleskom jeziku, Beograd: Filološki fakultet.
- Mišković-Luković 2008: M. Mišković-Luković, Constructing a national identity: The politics of representation in the Serbian public discourse, in: F. H. van Eemeren, D. C. Williams and I. Z. Zagar (eds), Understanding argumentation: Work in progress, Amsterdam: Sic Sat – Rozenberg, 193-204.
- Mišković-Luković 2009: M. Mišković-Luković, Is there a chance that I might kinda sort of take your out to dinner?: The role of the pragmatic particles kind of and sort of in utterance interpretation, Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (3), 602-625.
- Mišković-Luković 2011: M. Mišković-Luković, What indeed did I say?: In quest for the intermediate phenomenon in the contemporary inferential pragmatic theory, Srpski jezik, XVI, 185-203.
- Mišković-Luković, Dedaić 2010: M. Mišković-Luković, M. N. Dedaić, South Slavic discourse particles: Introduction, in: M. N. Dedaić and M. Mišković-Luković (eds), South Slavic discourse particles, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-22.
- Östman 1981: J-O. Östman, You know: A discourse-functional approach, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Pomerantz 1996: A. Pomerantz, Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes, in: J. Maxwell Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, Cambridge: CUP, 57-101.
- Schiffrin 1996: D. Schiffrin, Discourse markers, Cambridge: CUP.
- Smith, Jucker 2000: S. W. Smith, A. H. Jucker, Actually and other markers of an apparent discrepancy
- between propositional attitudes of conversational partners, in: G. Andersen and T. Fretheim (eds), Pragmatic markers and propositional attitude, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 207-238.
- Sperber 2000: D. Sperber, Metarepresenations in an evolutionary perspective, in: D. Sperber (ed), Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective, Oxford: OUP, 117-137.
- Sperber, Wilson 1995: D. Sperber, D. Wilson, Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd edn.), Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.