SIGNALING NON-ENDORSEMENT IN PERSUASIVE DISCOURSE: THE CASE OF GREENWASHING

Липар 90 (2026)  (59-74 стр.)

АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Nina Ž. Manojlović 

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/LIPAR90.059M

САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:

The paper examines texts on greenwashing, a relatively recent phenomenon, focusing on linguistic expressions that signal dissociative or non-endorsing attitude towards propositional constituents or entire propositions. Following the idea that all content words potentially encode procedural information, the study explores whether expressions whose conventional meaning is primarily conceptual may give rise to procedural effects in the specific context of persuasive discourse. The corpus consists of English-language texts on greenwashing drawn from journalistic, consumer-oriented, and popular academic sources. Lexical expressions potentially signaling non-endorsement were manually extracted, and a representative set of the most frequent items (so-called, allegedly, supposedly, and claim) was selected for qualitative pragmatic analysis. The analysis shows that while these expressions primarily contribute conceptual content, in persuasive discourse they may additionally constrain the inferential route by triggering a nonendorsing interpretation.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:

discourse analysis, pragmatics, relevance theory, echoic concept, persuasive discourse, greenwashing

ПРОЈЕКАТ / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The research in this paper was funded according to the Agreement on the transfer of funds for financing the scientific research work of teaching staff at accredited higher education institutions in 2026 (451-03-34/2026-03/ 200198.).

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:

Sources (accessed 7/17/2026)
  • G1: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/feb/16/scottish-powerlaunches-new-100-green-energy-tariff
  • G2: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/may/29/brazilgreenwash-environment-research-study-consumer-products
  • G3: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/03/dirty-secret-fossilfuel-free-building-embodied-carbon-building-glass-steel-blocks
  • G4: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/30/unacceptablegreenwashing-scottish-farmed-salmon-should-not-be-labelled-organic-saycharities
  • G5: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/apr/26/barclays-accused-ofgreenwashing-over-financing-for-italian-oil-company
  • W1: https://www.which.co.uk/news/article/green-claims-how-to-spotgreenwashing-atnH43T0Tp5c
  • W2: https://www.which.co.uk/policy-and-insight/article/how-green-are-greenclaims-arytT3b5PZ14
  • W3: https://www.which.co.uk/policy-and-insight/article/policy-andinsightarticlewhich-responds-to-crackdown-on-confusing-environmentalclaims-and-greenwashing-a2mOX6m3ap6j
  • W4: https://www.which.co.uk/policy-and-insight/article/opinion-how-canconsumers-trust-companies-eco-claims-aDVvq6v4UL3e
  • W5: https://www.which.co.uk/policy-and-insight/article/which-raises-alarmover-greenwashing-risks-as-it-finds-hundreds-of-products-using-vague-andunsubstantiated-environmental-claims-a0Fwg3w242Zd
  • CR1: https://www.consumerreports.org/home-garden/ecolabels-green-labels/ consumers-guide-to-greenwashing-a2339735851/
  • CR2: https://www.consumerreports.org/home-garden/cleaning/cleanculthousehold-cleaners-review-a7624471106/
  • CR3: https://www.consumerreports.org/home-garden/cleaning/safer-ways-toclean-your-kitchen-a7520869240/
  • CR4: https://www.consumerreports.org/home-garden/recycling/trashie-clothesrecycling-might-help-the-environment-a2663132840/
  • CR5: https://www.consumerreports.org/home-garden/cleaning/should-you-buygreen-cleaners-a5868589380/
  • C1: https://theconversation.com/greenwashing-energy-companies-make-falseclaims-about-sustainability-they-should-be-held-to-account-202995
  • C2: https://theconversation.com/totalenergies-french-court-ruling-over-falseclimate-claims-could-boost-african-cases-against-polluters-270198
  • C3: https://theconversation.com/can-you-trust-climate-information-how-andwhy-powerful-players-are-misleading-the-public-260251
  • C4: https://theconversation.com/boys-will-be-boys-why-consumers-dont-punishbig-polluters-for-greenwashing-lies-194902
  • C5: https://theconversation.com/the-devil-is-in-the-detail-when-it-comes-toresponsible-investing-126539
Literature
  • Blakemore 1987: D. Blakemore, Semantic Constraints on Relevance, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Carston 2002: R. Carston, Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Curry 2024: N. Curry. Questioning the Climate Crisis: A Contrastive Analysis of Parascientific Discourses. Nordic Journal of English Studies. https://doi. org/10.35360/njes.v23i2.39190
  • De Freitas Netto  et al 2020: S. V. De Freitas NettoM. Sobral, A. Ribeiro, G. R. Da Luz Soares. Concepts and forms of greenwashing: a systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3
  • Delmans and Burbano 2011: M. Delmas, V. C. Burbano. The Drivers of Greenwashing. California Management Review, 54, 64 – 87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64 Fairclough 2001: N. Fairclough, Language and Power, London: Routledge.
  • Gjerstad and Flottum 2021: Ø. Gjerstad, K. Fløttum. Climate change lifestyle narratives among Norwegian citizens: A linguistic analysis of survey discourse. European Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1122
  • Huang and Che 2024: X. Huang, S. Che. A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Chinese and American News Coverage on Climate Change. International Journal of English Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v14n3p42
  • Jäger, Maier 2016: S. Jäger, F. Maier, Analysing Discourses and Dispositives: A Foucauldian Approach to Theory and Methodology, Methods of critical discourse studies, 3, 109‒136.
  • Jaworska 2018: S. Jaworska. Change But no Climate Change: Discourses of Climate Change in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in the Oil Industry.
  • International Journal of Business Communication, 55, 194 – 219. https://doi. org/10.1177/2329488417753951
  • Lyon and Montgomery 2015: T. P. Lyon, A. W. Montgomery. The Means and End of Greenwash. Organization & Environment 28(2): 223–249.
  • Mautner 2009: G. Mautner, Checks and balances: How Corpus Linguistics Can Contribute to CDA, in: R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd edition, London: Sage Publications, 154–179.
  • Naz et al. 2022: N. Naz, A. Atta, A. Hassan. Climate Change and Linguistic Assistance to Overcome Its Risks: An Eco Linguistic Analysis of Greta Thunberg Speech. World Journal of English Language. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n7p117
  • Nemes et al 2022: N. Nemes, S. J. Scanlan, P. Smith, T. Smith, M. Aronczyk, S. Hill, S. Lewis, A. W. Montgomery, F. Tubiello, D. Stabinsky. An Integrated Framework to Assess Greenwashing. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084431
  • Schiffrin et al. 2008: D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Seele and Gatti 2017: P. Seele, L. Gatti. Greenwashing Revisited: In Search of a Typology and Accusation-Based Definition Incorporating Legitimacy Strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment 26(2): 239–252.
  • Sneideriene and Legenzova 2024: A. Sneideriene, R. Legenzova. Greenwashing prevention in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosures: a bibliometric analysis. Research in International Business and Finance. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102720
  • Sperber and Wilson 1986: D. Sperber, D. Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Sperber and Wilson 2008: D. Sperber, D. Wilson. The interpretation of gradable adjectives. Talk to UCL Pragmatics Reading Group, March 2008.
  • Van Dijk 1998: T. A. Van Dijk, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London: SAGE.
  • Van Dijk 2001: T. van Dijk, Critical Discourse Analysis, in: D. Tannen, D. Cliffrei, H. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, New York: Wiley Blackwell, 353–371.
  • Wang and Huan 2023: G. Wang, C. Huan. Negotiating climate change in public discourse: insights from critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 21, 133 – 145. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2198725
  • Williams 2024: J. Williams. Greenwashing: Appearance, illusion and the future of ‘green’ capitalism. Geography Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12736
  • Wilson 2011: D. Wilson, The Conceptual-Procedural Distinction: Past, Present and Future,  In: Escandell-Vidal, V and Leonetti, M and Ahern, A, (eds.) Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing. 3-31.
  • Wilson and Sperber 2004: D. Wilson, D. Sperber. Relevance Theory. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, Oxford: Blackwell. 607–632.
  • Wilson and Sperber 2012: D. Wilson, D. Sperber. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wodak 2009: R. Wodak. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wodak 2012: R. Wodak. Editor’s Introduction: Critical Discourse Analysis, in: R. Wodak (ed.), Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage Publications.
  • Wodak and Meyer 2009: R. Wodak, M. Meyer, Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology, in: R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2(1), London: SAGE Publications, 1‒33.
Post Views: 56