INSTITUCIONALNI INTEGRITET I TRANSPARENTNOST U JAVNIM NABAVKAMA: KLASTER ANALIZA ZEMALJA EVROPSKE UNIJE

Institucionalne promene kao determinanta privrednog razvoja Republike Srbije (2026) [pp. 247-259]  

AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Radonjić Ljubivoje, Radulović Marija
Download Full Pdf   
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/IP26.247R
ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:

Rad evaluira podatke o javnim nabavkama u 2024. godini u odabranim zemljama Evropske unije (EU), posmatrajući ukupne i prosečne vrednosti tendera, broj ugovora i strukturu implementiranih procedura uz poseban naglasak na indikatore integriteta i transparentnosti. Klasterizacija metodom K-srednjih vrednosti identifikuje tri grupe zemalja. Prvi klaster čine tržišta sa velikim brojem javnih nabavki i visokim prosečnim vrednostima tendera, ali umerenim vrednostima integriteta i transparentnosti. Drugi klaster čine mala i srednja tržišta sa relativno višim vrednostima indikatora transparentnosti. Treći klaster obrazuju zemlje u kojima preovlađuje format otvorenih procedura, ali heterogeni i često niži indikatori integriteta. Zaključak je da se zemlje sa iskustvom u realizaciji velikog broja tendera, neretko i dalje susreću sa izazovima u postizanju viših nivoa integriteta i transparentnosti u javnim nabavkama. Osim toga, visok nivo otvorenih procedura ne garantuje istovremeno i viši nivo institucionalnog integriteta, što ukazuje na složen odnos između formalne proceduralne strukture i kvaliteta upravljanja u javnim nabavkama.

KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI:

javne nabavke, transparentnost, institucionalni integritet, metod K-srednjih vrednosti

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / PROJEKAT:
REFERENCES / LITERATURA:
  1. Albano, G. L., & Sparro, M. (2010). Flexible Strategies for Centralized Public Procurement. Review of Economics and Institutions, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5202/rei.v1i2.17
  2. Aryee, R., Kanyoke, E. A., Addey, G. B., & Nyamah, E. Y. (2025). Public procurement corruption in developing countries context: A review and research agenda. SN Social Sciences, 5(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01071-3
  3. Bagnasco, A. M. (2023). Public Procurement Between Emergency and Transparency: Where We Are. In E. Demir, M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, & F. D’Ascenzo (Eds), Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives (pp. 393–407). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30061-5_24
  4. Baltrunaite, A., Giorgiantonio, C., Mocetti, S., & Orlando, T. (2021). Discretion and Supplier Selection in Public Procurement. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 37(1), 134–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewaa009
  5. Caliński, T., & Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 3(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927408827101.
  6. Coviello, D., & Mariniello, M. (2014). Publicity requirements in public procurement: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Public Economics, 109(C), 76–100.
  7. Dikmen, S., & Çiçek, H. G. (2023). Fighting Against Corruption and Bribery in Public Procurements During the Covid-19 Pandemic. In R. W. McGee & S. Benk (Eds), The Ethics of Bribery: Theoretical and Empirical Studies (pp. 309–328). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17707-1_18
  8. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2010). Disclosure by Politicians. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 179–209. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.2.179
  9. European Commission. (2020). Inforegio—Public Procurement—Guidance for practitioners (2018). https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/guidelines/2018/public-procurement-guidance-for-practitioners-2018
  10. Everitt, B., & Hothorn, T. (2011). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis with R. Springer Science & Business Media.
  11. Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering High-Level Corruption: Cross-National Objective Corruption Risk Indicators Using Public Procurement Data. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000461
  12. Fazekas, M., & Tóth, I. J. (2016). From Corruption to State Capture: A New Analytical Framework with Empirical Applications from Hungary. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 320–334.
  13. Fountoukidis, I. G., Antoniou, I. E., & Varsakelis, N. C. (2023). Competitive conditions in the public procurement markets: An investigation with network analysis. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 50(2), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-022-00251-z
  14. Georgieva, I. (2017). The Public Procurement System in Bulgaria: Authorities, Participants, Control and Achievements. In I. Georgieva (Ed.), Using Transparency Against Corruption in Public Procurement: A Comparative Analysis of the Transparency Rules and their Failure to Combat Corruption (pp. 77–116). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51304-1_4
  15. Gola, J. (2018). Control of Public Procurement in the European Union: Selected Problems. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & U. Can (Eds), Eurasian Economic Perspectives (pp. 105–112). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67916-7_7
  16. Halonen, K.-M. (2017). Disclosure rules in eu public procurement: Balancing between competition and transparency. Journal of Public Procurement, 16(4), 528–553.
  17. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2009). Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Lyra, M. S., Damásio, B., Pinheiro, F. L., & Bacao, F. (2022). Fraud, corruption, and collusion in public procurement activities, a systematic literature review on data-driven methods. Applied Network Science, 7(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00523-6
  19. MacQueen, J. (1967). Multivariate observations. In Proceedings ofthe 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability(Vol. 1, pp. 281-297). Oakland, CA, USA: University of California press.
  20. Nai, R., Sulis, E., & Meo, R. (2024). ITH: An open database on Italian Tenders 2016–2023. Scientific Data, 11(1), 1452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04342-5
  21. Nemec, P. (2024). Contesting the public works domain: Examining the factors affecting presence and success of SMES in public procurement. Empirical Economics, 67(5), 2135–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02615-x
  22. Onur, I., & Tas, B. K. O. (2019). Optimal bidder participation in public procurement auctions. International Tax and Public Finance, 26(3), 595–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9515-2
  23. Plebankiewicz, E. (2024). Procedures for Awarding Work Contracts in Europe. Buildings, 14(4), 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040883
  24. Plebankiewicz, E., & Kozik, R. (2024). Select contractors procedures in Europe. Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference (2024). https://doi.org/10.3311/CCC2024-136
  25. Pliatsidis, A. C. (2024). Analyzing concentration in the Greek public procurement market: A network theory approach. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 51(2), 431–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00291-z
  26. Sanchez Graells, A. (2013). The difficult balance between transparency and competition in public procurement: Some recent trends in the case law of the European Courts and a look at the new directives [Report]. University of Leicester. https://figshare.le.ac.uk/articles/report/The_difficult_balance_between_transparency_and_competition_in_public_procurement_some_recent_trends_in_the_case_law_of_the_European_Courts_and_a_look_at_the_new_directives/10165820/1
  1. Soylu, A., Corcho, Ó., Elvesæter, B., Badenes-Olmedo, C., Yedro-Martínez, F., Kovacic, M., Posinkovic, M., Medvešček, M., Makgill, I., Taggart, C., Simperl, E., Lech, T. C., & Roman, D. (2022). Data Quality Barriers for Transparency in Public Procurement. Information, 13(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020099
  2. Szucs, F. (2024). Discretion and Favoritism in Public Procurement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 22(1), 117–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvad017
  3. Tátrai, T., Vörösmarty, G., & Juhász, P. (2024). Intensifying Competition in Public Procurement. Public Organization Review, 24(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00742-0
  4. Telles, P. (2025). Correcting the lost decade of electronic public procurement in the EU. ERA Forum, 26(3), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-025-00851-x
Post Views: 14