INOVACIJE I DIGITALIZACIJA – UTICAJ NA EKONOMSKI RAST REPUBLIKE SRBIJE

Institucionalne promene kao determinanta privrednog razvoja Republike Srbije (2026) [pp. 105-119]  

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Mićić Vladimir
Download Full Pdf   
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/IP26.105M
ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

Inovacije i brze tehnološke promene utiču da digitalni razvoj postaje osnova ekonomskog rasta. Ovo zahteva proces digitalne transformacije ili digitalizacije. Sve ekonomije danas prolaze kroz digitalnu transformaciju što omogućava napredak ka digitalnoj ekonomiji koja je suštinski deo Četvrte industrijske revolucije (4IR). Digitalne ekonomije su funkcija digitalnih tehnologija. Inovacije i digitalizacija su vodeći pokretači rasta produktivnosti i održivog ekonomskog rasta. Dovode do transformacije tradicionalnih sektora i strukturnih promena privrede. Predmet istraživanja u radu su inovacije i nivo digitalne transformacije kao pokretači ekonomskog rasta Republike Srbije. Cilj rada jeste utvrđivanje međuzavisnosti između inovacija digitalizacije i ekonomskog rasta Republike Srbije. Merenje rezultata digitalne transformacije je od značaja za donošenje i sprovođenje efikasnih politika kako bi se iskoristio potencijal digitalnih tehnologija. Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju da je R. Srbiji potrebna efikasnija javna politika koja bi podstakla inovacije i digitalnu transformaciju usled slabog intenziteta uticaj na ekonomski rast. Inovaciona politika je posebno značajna zato što nedostaje automatsko generisanje adekvatnih podsticaja za inovacije.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

Inovacije, inovaciona politika, digitalizacija, digitalne tehnologije, ekonomski rast

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / ПРОЈЕКАТ:

Ovo istraživanje je finansijski podržano od strane Ministarstva nauke, tehnološkog razvoja i inovacija Republike Srbije (Ugovor br. 451-03-33/2026-03/200099).“

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:
  1. Almeida de Figueiredo, S. (2024). Digital readiness and economic growth: Analyzing the Impact of DESI Scores on GDP in European Countries. Economy and Finance: English-Language Edition of Gazdaság És Pénzügy, 11(3), 282-300.
  2. (2024). Big Data, Preuzeto sa: https://www.bbvaresearch.com/en/publicaciones/digix-the-digitization-index/ (datum pristupa: 10.10.2025).
  3. Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2003). Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression. Critical care, 7(6), 451.
  4. Billon, M., Lera-Lopez, F., & Marco, R. (2010). Differences in digitalization levels: a multivariate analysis studying the global digital divide. Review of World Economics, 146, 39-73.
  5. Cámara, N., & Tuesta, D. (2017). DiGiX: the digitization index. BBVA Bank, Economic Research Department, 17(03). 1-4.
  6. Citaristi, I. (2022). World intellectual property organization—wipo. In The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2022 (pp. 395-398). Routledge.
  7. Coccia, M. (2012). Political economy of R&D to support the modern competitiveness of nations and determinants of economic optimization and inertia. Technovation, 32(6), 370-379.
  8. Cvetanović, D., Nikolić, M., Pokrajac, S. (2016). Uticaj inovacija na zapošlјavanje i prihode malih i srednjih preduzeća u Republici Srbiji, Facta Universitatis, Series: Economics and Organizationl, 13,(2), pp. 187 – 203.
  9. Dajić, M. (2017). Uloga i značaj inovacija u razvoju privrede Srbije. Ekonomski signali: Poslovni magazin, 12(1), 55-64.
  10. Dempere, J., Qamar, M., Allam, H., & Malik, S. (2023). The impact of innovation on economic growth, foreign direct investment, and self-employment: A global perspective. Economies, 11(7), 182.
  11. Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2019). The network readiness index 2019. Washington: Portulans Institute.
  12. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., León, L. R., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.). (2024). Global innovation index 2024: Unlocking the promise of social entrepreneurship. WIPO. 17
  13. European Commission. (2019). Digital transformation. Preuzeto sa: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/digitaltransformation_en (datum pristupa: 21.10.2025)
  14. European Commission. (2024). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Preuzeto sa: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi-2022m (datum pristupa: 28.08.2024)
  15. Georgescu, I., Androniceanu, A. M., Kinnunen, J., & Drăgulănescu, I. V. (2021). Correlative approach to digitalization and economic growth. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 44-57).
  16. Grabowska, M. (2025). Sweden in the Light of the European Union’s “Path to the Digital Decade” Policy Programme 2030. Studia Europejskie-Studies in European Affairs, 29(2), 171-189.
  17. Habibi, F., & Zabardast, M. A. (2020). Digitalization, education and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Middle East and OECD countries. Technology in Society, 63, 101370.
  18. Ivanović, V. (2024). Ocena inovativnosti Srbije iz perspektive Globalnog indeksa inovativnosti regionalna i nacionalna dimenzija. U: Ivanović, V., Anđelković, B., Tanja Jakobi, T. (red.), Inovativna Srbija 2024, (str. 1-26). Beoograd: Centar za istraživanje javnih politika, Beograd.
  19. Jadraque Gago, E., Etxebarria Berrizbeitia, S., Pacheco Torres, R., & Muneer, T. (2020). Effect of land use/cover changes on urban cool island phenomenon in Seville, Spain. Energies, 13(12), 3040.
  20. Kutlača, Đ., & Semenčenko, D. (2005). Koncept nacionalnog inovacionog sistema. Institut“ Mihajlo Pupin“, Centar za istraživanje razvoja nauke i tehnologije.
  21. Kutlača, Đ., & Semenčenko, D. (2015). Nacionalni inovacioni sistem u Srbiji: prošlost, sadašnjost, budućnost. Institut Mihajlo Pupin, str. 8-9.
  22. Kuznets, S. (1980). Recent population trends in less developed countries and implications for internal income inequality. In Population and economic change in developing countries (pp. 471-516). University of Chicago Press.
  23. Lazović, V., Jovović, M., Backović, T., Djuričković, T., & Rondović, B. (2022). Is digital economy a good samaritan to developing countries?. Sustainability, 14(14), 8471. 25-29.
  24. Malik, K., Glynn, S., Butler, J., & Miles, I. (2003). Developing innovation policies for the knowledge economy in Europe. Innovation, 5(2-3), 225-233.
  25. Maradana, R. P., Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Gaurav, K., Jayakumar, M., & Chatterjee, D. (2017). Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 2-23.
  26. Marolt, M., Pucihar, A., Lenart, G., & Vidmar, D. (2019, May). Digital transformation scoreboard–Case of Slovenia and Croatia. In 2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) (pp. 1380-1385). IEEE.
  27. Mićić V. (2020a). Četvrta industrijska revolucija i strukturne promene industrije Republike Srbije, Kragujevac: Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevacu, 126-128.
  28. Mićić, V. (2010). Konkurentnost industrije Srbije kao pretpostavka njenog efikasnog razvoja. Univerzitet u Kragujevcu.
  29. Mićić, V. (2020b). Uticaj tranzicije na tehnološku strukturu industrije Republike Srbije u uslovima evropskih integracija. U: Despotović, D., Milovanović, G., Savović, S., Rejman Petrović, D., Đurić, Z. (red.), Aktuelni makroekonomski i mikroekonomski aspekti evropskih integracija Republike Srbije, (str. 153-161). Kragujevac: Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu.
  30. Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., & Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), p. 856.
  31. (2018). Going digital in a multilateral world. Preuzeto sa: https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/C-MIN-2018-6-EN.pdf (datum pristupa: 10.09.2024).
  32. Pece, A. M., Simona, O. E. O., & Salisteanu, F. (2015). Innovation and economic growth: An empirical analysis for CEE countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 461-467.
  33. Penezić, N. (2008). Preduzetništvo–savremeni pristup. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, str.190.
  34. Pokrajac, S. (2010). Preduzetništvo: izazovi i putevi „kreativne destrukcije“ privrede Srbije. Mašinski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd, str. 141.
  35. Porter, M. E. (1999). Michael Porter on Competition. The Antitrust Bulletin, 44(4), pp. 841–880.
  36. Reamer, A. (2014). The impacts of technological invention on economic growth–a review of the literature. The George Washington Institute of Public Policy, pp.1-55.
  37. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
  38. Santiago, S. B., & Silva, J. R. (2023, November). Strategic Roadmap for Digital Transformation Based on Measuring Industry 4.0 Maturity and Readiness. In International Conference on Innovative Intelligent Industrial Production and Logistics (pp. 336-347). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  39. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  40. Strategija pametne specijalizacije u Republici Srbiji, (2020). Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije No. 21/2020. Ministarstvo prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvoja Republike Srbije, str. 138-136.
  41. Šormaz, G. (2021). Značaj preduzetništva i inovativnosti za ekonomski razvoj Republike Srbije. Trendovi u poslovanju, 9(18), 30-39.
  42. Štrbac, D. (2025). Naučno-tehnološka i inovaciona politika: indikatori i instrumenti. Institut ekonomskih nauka Beograd: str. 67-69.
  43. Taylor, M. Z. (2016). The politics of innovation: Why some countries are better than others at science and technology. Oxford University Press, pp. 327-329.
  44. Ulku, H. (2004). R&D, innovation, and economic growth: An empirical analysis, IMF Working Paper WP/04/185, International Monetary Fund, p.27.
  45. Vrana, J., & Singh, R. (2022). Digitization, digitalization, and digital transformation. In Handbook of nondestructive evaluation 4.0 (pp. 107-123). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  46. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Unlocking the Promise of Social Entrepreneurship. Geneva: WIPO.
  47. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2025). Global Innovation Index 2025: Innovation at a Crossroads, pp. 237-243.
Post Views: 50