Knowledge, Understanding and Evaluation of Flexible Forms of Teaching by Students of Primary School Teaching Study Programs

Дете, Култура, Образовање (2024), str. 61-76

 

АУТОР / AUTHOR(S): Matija Jenko, Lara Strgaršek, Barbara Kopačin

Download Full Pdf    

DOI: 10.46793/DKO24.03MJ

САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:

The forms of teaching in the modern world are rapidly changing and are being upgraded, thus enabling the development of certain competencies that cannot be acquired by traditional methods used in the educational process along the entire vertical of education. For classroom teachers to include them in the educational process once they start teaching, they must first get to know them during their studies. We included 54 students of Primary School Teaching study programs at the first and second level in the research. In this paper, we analyzed students’ responses to several questions aimed at exploring their knowledge, understanding, and appreciation of the importance of incorporating flexible teaching methods into lessons for the first and second educational cycles in primary school. We also examined their experiences with implementing these methods during their teaching practice and identified the areas of flexible teaching they wish to further develop before completing their studies in Primary School.

Teaching at a Slovenian Faculty of Education.We found that almost half of the students are familiar with flexible forms of teaching, and all of them think their inclusion in the educational process is very important, even though many of them did not get to know them during their study practice, but they want to get to know them in the time until they finish their studies and start teaching.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:

flexible forms of teaching, students of Primary School Teaching study programme, 1st and 2nd educational cycles in primary school, study practice.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES: 

  • Barle Lakota, A. & Trunk Širca, N. (2010). Pomen izobraževanja v družbi prihodnosti. V N. Trunk Širca (ur.): Model učinkovitega managementa visokošolskega zavoda (str. 23–35). Univerza na Primorskem: Fakulteta za management.
  • Birsa, E. (2015). Medpredmetno povezovanje pri pouku likovne vzgoje. [Neobjavljena doktorska disertacija]. Univerza na Primorskem: Pedagoška fakulteta.
  • Ćurko, , Feiner, F., Gerjolj, S., Juhant, J., Kress, K., Pokorny, S., Schlenk, E. & Strahov- nik, V. (2016). Vzgoja za etiko in vrednote – Priročnik za učitelje in vzgojitelje. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/project-result-content/466546ff- e580-44dc-b88f-62978e1000ce/ManualTeachers_SI.pdf.
  • Delors, J. & UNESCO. (1996). Learning, the treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. UNESCO
  • Dolenc Orbanić, N. & Furlan, P. (2015). Pogledi bodočih učiteljev na poučevanje nara- voslovja. V D. Hozjan (ur.): Aktivnosti učencev v učnem procesu (str. 343–356). Univerzitetna založba Annales.
  • Dumont, H., Istance, D. & Benavides, F. (2010). Nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. OECD.
  • Echazarra, A., Salinas, D., Méndez, I., Denis, V. & Rech, G. (2016). How teachers teach and students learn: Successful strategies for school. OECD.
  • Mesec, B. (1998). Uvod v kvalitativno metodologijo. Visoka šola za socialno delo.
  • Mažgon, J. (2008). Razvoj akcijskega raziskovanja na temeljnih predpostavkah kvalita- tivne metodologije. Znanstvenoraziskovalni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.
  • Naidu, S. (2017a). How flexible is flexible learning, who is to decide and what are its implications? Distance Education, 38(3), 269–272.
  • Naidu, S. (2017b). Openness and flexibility are the norm, but what are the challenges?
  • Distance Education, 38(1), 1–4.
  • Naidu, S. (2018). Recalibrating existing choreographies for open and flexible learning.
  • Distance Education, 39(4), 437–440.
  • Oktay, J. S. (2012). Grounded Theory. Oxford University Press.
  • Pulko, S. & Ulčnik, N. (2021). Strategije za izvajanje prožnih oblik učenja in poučevanja s pomočjo učnega e-okolja Slovenščina na dlani. V N. Ulčnik (ur.): Slovenščina na dlani 3 (str. 137–142). Univerza v Mariboru: Pedagoška fakulteta.
  • Rutar, S., Andrejašič, A., Mikelič Goja, T., Bandelj, D., Drljič, K., Florjančič, V., Gra- hovec, V., Kiswarday, V. R. & Skrt, I. (2017). Vključevanje prožnih oblik učenja in poučevanja v izobraževalni proces na Univerzi na Primorskem v obdobju 2017– 2020. Univerza na Primorskem.
  • Svetlin Kastelic, N. & Tuš, J. (2022). Delež moških med vodstvenimi delavci v osnov- nošolskem izobraževanju enkrat večji kot med vsemi zaposlenimi. Ljubljana: Statis- tični urad Republike Slovenije. Retrieved August 6, 2024 from https://www.stat.si/ StatWeb/News/Index/10389
  • Toselli, L. (2020). La didattica a distanza. Funziona, se sai come farla. Edizioni Sonda
  • UNESCO (2015). Rethinking Education. Towards a global common good? Vogrinc, J. (2008). Kvalitativno raziskovanje na pedagoškem področju. Univerza v
  • Ljubljane: Pedagoška fakulteta.
  • Veletsianos, G. & Houlden, S. (2019). An analysis of flexible learning and flexibility over the last 40 years of Distance Education. Distance Education, 40(4), 454–468.
  • Vrhovec, K. (2023). Land art v 2. razredu. Osnovna šola Žužemberk. Retrieved July 16, 2024 from https://www.oszuzemberk.si/land-art-v-2-razredu/