THE 5TH CONGRESS OF SLAVIC GEOGRAPHERS AND ETHNOGRAPHERS (2024) (стр. 291-302)
 

АУТОР / AUTHOR(S): Goran Mutabdžija

Download Full Pdf    

DOI: 10.46793/CSGE5.291GM

САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:

This paper provides a methodological framework for the synthesis of geographical thinking during the century-long period of modern, which began with the introduction of regular university geography classes in the 1870s and ended with the announcement of the spatial turn in the social sciences in the 1970s. To offer an original solution in the field of research on contemporary geographical thinking, the author started from the analysis of reference works in this field. Based on the characteristics of the philosophy of basic geographical approaches (empiricist, positivist, humanist, and structuralist), the author singled out three dominant concepts: historical-geographical, philosophical-geographical, and political-geographical. Based on these examples and theoretically based on classification of scientific thinking, the author offered a post-structuralist account of the history of geographical thinking. It is based on two assumptions, that there was a strong reception of key ideas from other scientific disciplines (philosophy, social theory, and regional economy) and that geophilosophy can serve as a kind of amalgam that will offer a post-structuralist framework for presenting contemporary geographical thinking. Since a mere presentation of the historical development of modern geography would to a significant extent represent only a bibliographic-encyclopaedic presentation of the development of certain approaches (positivist, humanist, and structuralist), the author combined an evolutionary-historical presentation (analytical method) with an idiographic and nomothetic approach. Thus, a theoretical framework was created which will give this research a synthetic character and which will be applied to socio-geographical studies of the contemporary history of Sarajevo from the point of view of behavioural geography.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:

geophilosophy; modern; philosophy of geography; geographic axes; spatial thinking

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:

  • Agnew, J. (2009). Territory. In D. Gregory et al. (Eds.), The Dictionary of Human Geography (pp. 746–747). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Delaney, D. (2009). Territory and Territoriality. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 196–208). Elsevier
  • Deleuze, G. (2009). Razlika i ponavljanje. [Difference and repetition]. Fedon.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2013). Kapitalizam i šizofrenija 2. Tisuću platoa [Capitalism and schizophrenia 2. A thousand plateaus]. Sandorf & Mizantrop.
  • Elackov, A. B. (2013). Territorija i rajon v geografičeskoj matrice prostranstvennosti [Territory and region in the geographic matrix of spatiality]. Известия РАН. Серия географическая, 3, 5–13. https://doi.org/
    10.15356/0373-2444-2013-3-5-13
  • Foucault, M. (2005). Druga mesta. [Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias]. In P. Milenković & D. Marinković (Eds.), Michel Foucault 192619842004: hrestomatija (pp. 28–36). Vojvođanska sociološka asocijacija.
  • Foucault, M. (2012). Moć/znanje. Odabrani spisi i razgovori 19721977. [Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977]. Mediterran Publishing
  • Grčić, M. (2011). Problem celovitosti u geografiji [The problem of completeness in geography]. Treći kongres srpskih geografa [The 3rd Congress of Serbian Geographers] (pp. 97–107). SGD & GDRS.
  • Gregory, D. (1978). Ideology, Science and Human Geography. Hutchinson.
  • Gregory, D. (1994). Geographical imaginations. Blackwell.
  • Harvey, D. (1985). The Geopolitics of Capitalism. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social Relations and Spatial Structures (pp. 128–163). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7_7
  • Harvey, D. (1990). Flexible accumulation through urbanization: Reflections on “post-modernism” in the American city. Perspecta 26, 251–272. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1567167
  • Harvey, D. (2013). Kratka povijest neoliberalizma [A Brief History of Neoliberalism]. Vbz.
  • Kostinskiy, G. D. (1997). Geografičeskaja matrica prostranstvennosti [Geographic matrix of spatiality], Известия РАН, Серия географическая, 5, 16–31. http://www.mediafire.com/?xuk2loxa7gjxwyn
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Blackwell
  • Mutabdzija, G. (2023). Geophilosophy of the Мodern II: Practice. Amazon KDP
  • Mutabdzija, G. (2022a). Geophilosophy of the Мodern I: Theory. Amazon KDP
  • Temirbekov, А. Т. (2011). O suŝnosti i sootnošenii ponjatij “territorija” i “prostranstvo” v èkonomičeskoj i socialʹnoj geografii [On the essence and relationship of the concepts of “territory” and “space” in economic and social geography]. In Katrovskiy (Ed.) ,Socialʹno-èkonomičeskaja geografija: istorija, teorija, metody, praktika [Social-economical geography: hystory, methods, practice] (pp. 279–283). Универсум.
  • Warf, B. (2006). Humanistic geography. In B. Warf (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 233–236). Sage.