УРБАНИ ЈАВНИ ПРОСТОРИ И НОВЕ МОГУЋНОСТИ ЗА ОДРЖИВИ РАЗВОЈ

Одрживи развој : вектор Србије ка будућности (2024), str. 347-375

АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Мила Пуцар , Сања Симоновић Алфиревић

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/82154-04-4.347P

САЖЕТАК /ABSTRACT:

Идеја о важности отворених јавних простора за урбану одрживост може се пратити кроз велики број теоријских радова објављених у врхунским часописима и монографијама реномираних светских издавача. У исто време, у пракси урбаног планирања и дизајна, врло је значајна примена овог концепта, било да се ради о новим или реконструисаним јавним просторима. Локалне заједнице, планери и локално становништво препознали су еколошки, друштвени и економски значај урбаних јавних простора. Овим радом се, на основу прегледа литературе, анализира значај урбаног јавног простора као места сусрета, интеракције и као кључног фактора у стварању социјалне кохезије и идентитета, инклузивности и приступачности заједнице. Овај рад ставља акценат пре свега на односе урбаног јавног простора као елемента физичке структуре, који који је у интеракцији са друштвено-социјалним аспектима јавног простора. Разматрани су просторни и пројектантски аспекти, али и могући проблеми са којима се заједница суочава, идентификују проблрми и дају предлози за њихово решавање. Проучавањем иновативних приступа и креативних решења за пројектовање нових или трансформацију постојећих урбаних јавних простора у одрживе и мултифункционалне целине, које могу да подрже различите активности и потребе заједнице, доприноси се одрживости урбаних јавних простора, безбедности, сигурности и здравој животној срдини. У раду су предложена решења како доћи до паметних урбаних јавних простора коришћењем нових технологија које могу да побољшају њихову просторну, еколошку и социјално-економску вредност. Овим, као и другим параметрима отворених урбаних јавних простора бави се овај рад.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS: 

отворени урбани јавни простор, одрживи урбани развој, интегрално и партиципативно планирање, социјална кохезија.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:

  • Aelbrecht, P., Stevens, Q. & Kumar, S. (2021). European public space projects with social cohesion in mind: Symbolic, programmatic and minimalist approaches. European Planning Studies, 1–31.
  • Aelbrecht, P. (2016). ‘Fourth places’: The contemporary public settings for informal social interaction among strangers. Journal of Urban Design, 21(1), 124–152.
  • Aelbrecht, P., & Stevens, Q. (2019a). Emerging knowledge at the intersection of public space design and social cohesion. In P. Aelbrecht & Q. Stevens (eds.), Public space design and social cohesion: An international comparison (pp. 318–325). Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Aelbrecht, P., & Stevens, Q. (2019b). Public space design and social cohesion: An international comparison. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Алфиревић, Ђ., Симоновић Алфиревић, С. (2021) Мотиви за истицање угла у карактеризацији угаоних интерполација. Архитектура и урбанизам, 53, 74-88.
  • Alfirević, Đ., Simonović Alfirević, (2023). The Experience of Territoriality in the Living Space, Book of Proceedings. International Conference „Synergy of Architecture & Civil Engineering – SINARG 2023”, Niš, September 14-15, University of Niš – Faculty of Civil Engineering & Architecture, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, pp. 185−196.
  • Аlubuild (2024). Inclusion and accessibility in the design of buildings and public spaces. Available on: https://alubuild.com/en/inclusion-accessibility-buildings/ (accessed on July 25 2024).
  • Anderson, E. (2011). The Cosmopolitan Canopy: Race and Civility in Everyday Life; Norton: New York, NY, USA.
  • Askarizad, R., & Safari, H. (2020). The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran). Cities, 101, 102687.
  • Balmer, J.M.T. & Wang, W-Y. (2016). The corporate brand and strategic direction: Senior business school managers’ cognitions of corporate brand building and management (Conference Paper). Journal of Brand Management, 23(1), 8-21.
  • Barnada, J. (2024) The Barcelona Model: Public Space as a Synonym for Urban Adaptation. Available on: https://www.archdaily.com/1014716/the-barcelona-model-public-space-as-a-synonym-for-urban-adaptation (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  • Barnada, M. (2024). The Barcelona Model: Public Space as a Synonym for Urban Adaptation. Available on: https://www.archdaily.com/1014716/the-barcelona-model-public-space-as-a-synonym-for-urban-adaptation, фотографије: ©Jaume Barnada, © Joan Guillama (приступљено 25. јунa 2024).
  • Bašová, S. & Štefancová, L. (2017). Creative And Smart Public Spaces. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 5(1), 17-33.
  • Batty, М., Besussi, E., Maat, K., Hars, Ј. (2004). Representing multifunctional cities: density and diversity in space and time. Built Environment, 30(4), 324–337.
  • Bredewold, F., Haarsma, A., Tonkens, E., Jager, M. (2020). Convivial encounters: Conditions for the urban social inclusion of people with intellectual and psychiatric disabilities. Urban Studies, 57(10), 2047–2063.
  • Brown, S. C. & Lombard, J. L. (2014). Neighborhoods and social interaction. In R. Cooper, E. Burton, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Wellbeing and the environment: Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (pp. 1–29). Wiley.
  • Caccia, L. (2015). Mobilidade urbana: políticas públicas e apropriação do espaço em cidades Brasileiras , Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul Instituto De Geociências Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Geografia, Dissertation, Porto Alegre.
  • Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., Stone, A. M. (1993). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
  • Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., Tiesdell, S. (2010). Public Places-Urban Spaces, Architectural Press: Oxford.
  • Carmona, M. (2019). Place value: Place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. Journal of Urban Design, 24(1), 1–48.
  • Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W., & Curtis, S. (2008). Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health and Place, 14(3), 544–561.
  • Clark, А. (2015). Pope Francis to Urban Planners: Build Better Cities, Urban Climate News, Encyclical letter laudato si’ of the Holy Father Francis on care for our common home, Issue Nо. 56, International Association for Urban Climate, pp. 2. Available on: http://nextcity.org/daily/entry/pope-message­urban-planners-cities-encyclical (accessed on July 25 2024).
  • Climate, Energy and Urbanization A Guide on Strategies, Materials and Technologies for Sustainable Development in the Desert (2008). The National Center of Excellence on Sustainable Material and Renewable Technology (SMART) Innovations Global Institute of Sustainability / Ira. A. Fulton School of Engineering / College of Design Arizona State University.
  • Corner, Ј. (2006). “Terra Fluxus”, in: Waldheim Ch. (ed.) The Landscape Urbanism Reader, (pp. 21-33), NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Czafík, M. & Tóthová, Z. (2016). Percepcia suburbanizačného procesu v pohraničnom regióne Bratislavy a jeho potenciál. Czech Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(2), 27-35.
  • Dines, N., Cattell, V., Gesler, W., Curtis, S. (2006). Public spaces, social relations and well-being in East London. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1–43.
  • Daniels, К. (1997). The Technology of Ecological Building: Basic Principles and Measures, Examples and Ideas, Birkhäuser (Basel).
  • Danish Smart Cities (2012). Sustainable Living in аn Urban World, An overview of Danish Smart City competencies Copenhagen Cleantech Cluster, Editors: Jonas Mortensen Frederik Jonsbak Rohde Klaus Rovsing Kristiansen Maria Kanstrup-Clausen Marianna Lubanski © Copenhagen Capacity A part of Copenhagen Cleantech Cluster.
  • Dasgupta Sur, N., Bano, , Hesmondhalghсу, S. (2024). What do you do if you want to revolutionize public spaces in cities through innovation? Available on: https://www.linkedin.com/advice/1/what-do-you-want-revolutionize-public-spaces-cities-rvhke (accessed on April 13 2024).
  • Department of City Planning – NYC Planning (2024a). New York City’s Privately Owned Public Spaces – Overview. Available on: https://www.nyc.gov/site/planning/plans/pops/pops.page (приступљено 26. јунa 2024).
  • Department of City Planning – NYC Planning (2024b). New York City’s Privately Owned Public Spaces – Current Standards. Available on: https://www.nyc.gov/site/planning/plans/
    pops/pops-plaza-standards.page (приступљено 25. јунa 2024).
  • Gans, H. J. (2002). The sociology of space: A use-centered view. City & Community, 1(4), 329–339.
  • Hrůza, J. (2011). Stavitelé měst, Ed.: Agora, Praha p. 167.
  • Elin, N. (2006). Integral Urbanism, Routledge, NY, 2006. Published by Routledge, Available on: https://www.routledge.com/Integral-Urbanism/Ellin/p/book/9780415952286 (accessed on 25 July 2024).Evans, B., McDonald, F., Rudlin, D. (2011). Urban Identity. Learning from Place, Rout-ledge, London: New York.
  • Friedmann, J. (2010). Place and place-making in cities: a global perspective. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(2). 149–165. Available on: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649351003759573 (accessed on 16 May 2024).
  • Ganji, F., & Rishbeth, C. (2020). Conviviality by design: The socio-spatial qualities of spaces of intercultural urban encounters. Urban Design International, 25(3), 215–234
  • Gehl, J. (2010). Cities For People, Island Press: Washington.
  • Haccou, H. et al. (2007). MILU Guide: practitioners handbook for multifunctional intensive land use, MILU net – The Habiforum Fondation, Gouda.
  • Honey-Rosés, J., Anguelovski, I., Chireh, V.K., Daher, C., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C., Litt, J.S., Sánchez, U. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on public space: An early review of the emerging questions–design, perceptions and inequities. Cities Health, 1–17.
  • Hoppenbrouwer, E., & Louw, E. (2005). Mixed-use development: theory and practice in Amsterdam’s eastern docklands. European Planning Studies 7(13), 967-983.
  • Iveson, K. (2020). We Don’t Know What We’ve Got till It’s Gone—We Must Reclaim Public Space Lost to the Coronavirus Crisis. The Conversation. 2020. Available on: https://theconversation.com/we-dont-know-what-weve-got-till-its-gone-we-mustreclaim-public-space-lost-to-the-coronavirus-crisis-135817 (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  • Jie Qi, J., Suvodeep, M., Vasconcelos, A.C. (2024). Understanding the Relationship between Urban Public Space and Social Cohesion: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 7, 155–212.Kajtazi, I. B. (2007). Measuring Multifunctionality of Urban Area, Thesis. International Institute for Geo-Information Science, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Kaufmann-Hayoy, Р., Hammer T., Raemy, (2007). “Institutional Steering and Collective Action for Sustainable Landscape Development – The Case of the Vineyard Landscape at the Lake of Biel”. Avaiale on: http://www.ikaoe.unibe.ch/forschung/nie-bielersee/index.html. (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  • Kim, J., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby orchard village. Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 313–340.
  • Khemri, M. Y., Melis, A., Caputo, S. (2020). Sustaining the liveliness of public spaces in El Houma through placemaking. The Journal of Public Space, 5(1), 129–152.
  • Knox, P.L. (1984). Styles, symbolism and settings: the built environment and imperatives of urbanised capitalism. Architecture et Comportment, 2, 107–122.
  • Latham, A., Layton, J. (2019). Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: Studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass, 13(7), 1–15.
  • Lofand, L. H. (1998). The public realm: Exploring the city’s quintessential social territory. Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Lotfata, A. & Ataöv, A. (2020). Urban streets and urban social sustainability: A case study on Bagdat Street in Kadikoy. Istanbul. European Planning Studies, 28(9), 1735–1755.
  • Low, S. (2020). How Cafes, Bars, Gyms, Barbershops and Other ‘Third Places’ Create Our Social Fabric. The Conversation. Available on: https://theconversation.com/how-cafes-bars-gyms-barbershops-and-other-third-places-create-our-social-fabric-135530 (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  • Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Published by Routledge, 276 Pages. Available on: https://www.routledge.com/Public-and-Private-Spaces-of-the-City/Madanipour/p/book/9780415256292 (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  • Majoor, S. (2003). “New Norms for Multiple Intensive Land Use”, 39th Iso CaRO Congress. Available on: www.isocarp.net/Data/case_studies/306.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  • Marić, I., Pucar, M., Kovačević, B. (2016). Reducing the impact of climate change by applying information technologies and measures for improving energy efficiency in urban planning. International journal Energy and Buildings, 115, 102-111.
  • Mateo-Babiano, I. B. (2012). Public life in Bangkok’s urban spaces. Habitat International, 36(4), 452–461.
  • Martínez, L., Rennie, S.J. (2021). The Pandemic City: Urban Issues in the Time of COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(6), 3295.
  • McClimens, A., Doel, M., Ibbotson, R., Partridge, N., Muscroft, E., Lockwood, L. (2012). How do the “Peace Gardens” make you feel? Public space and personal wellbeing in city centre Shefeld. Journal of Urban Design, 17(1), 117–133.
  • Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. (2021). Revisiting lively streets: Social interactions in public space. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(2), 160–172.
  • Ненковић, М., Пуцар, М. (2006а). Модуси учешћа стручне јавности у одлукама које се тичу заштите животне средине. У ИАУС: Управљање одрживим просторним развојем, ур Н.Спасић, Б.Стојановић, рец. Д. Тошковић, Н.Милашин, Љ.Петрушевски, Р. Богдановић, стр.19-30.
  • Nenković, M., Pucar, М. (2006b). Aarhus Convention Aims in Energy Management in Serbia. International journal: Environmental Engineering and Management Journal (EEMJ), 5(6), 1371-1379.
  • Nenković-Riznić,, Simonović-Alfirević, S., Pucar, M., Brankov, B. (2022). Citizens’ participation during COVID-19 pandemic: lessons for the future, Conference proceedings of ICUP 2022 – International conference on urban planning, ed M. Tanić, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Nis, pp. 69-77.
  • New Urban Agenda (2016). Available on: https://www.old.uclg.org/en/media/news/why-are-public-spaces-important-new-urban-agenda (accessed on July 24 2024).
  • Nguyen, H. (2019). From pedestrian thoroughfare to public space: The social life of the Esplanade underpass. The Journal for Undergraduate Ethnography, 9(1), 1–17.
  • OECD, Multifunctionality: a framework for policy analysis, (1998) AGR/CA (98) 9, OECD publications, Paris.
  • OECD, Multifunctionality: towards an analytical approach, OECD publications, (2001) Paris.
  • Pacheco, P. (2017). Public Spaces: 10 Principles for Connecting People and the Streets. Available on: https://thecityfix.com/blog/public-spaces-10-principles-for-connecting-people-and-the-streets-priscila-pacheco/ (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  • Project for Public Spaces (2001). How to Turn a Place Around: a Handbook for Creating Successful Public Spaces, Project for Public Places: New York City, NY.
  • Public Space & Sustainable Urban Development (2015). For a better urban future, UN-Habitat, Geneva, p. 27. Available on: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/hlm/prgm/
    urbandevt/Public_Spaces_Geneva_2015/presentations/01_Saliez_Vital_Public_Spaces.pdf     (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  • Пуцар, М. (2005). Интегрално планирање и управљање енергетским програмима у процесу транзиције летња школа урбанизма: инвестиције на Западном Балкану, Велика Плана, мај 2005, стр. 147-164.
  • Пуцар, М. (2007). Могућност учешћа локалне управе и локалног становништва у процедурама примене локалне Агенде 21 и Акционог плана за осигурање одрживе животне средине, уводно предавање, учешће јавности и обавезе органа локалне управе у доношењу одлука везаних за заштиту животне средине и издавање еколошких дозвола, Бијељина.
  • Project for Public Spaces (2014). Ten Strategies for Transforming Cities and Public Spaces through Placemaking. Available on: https://www.pps.org/article/ten-strategies-for-transforming-cities-through-placemaking-public-spaces (приступљено 14. мајa 2024).
  • Pucar, М. (2016). Obnovljivi izvori i energetska efikasnost u funkciji inteligentnog grada Pametan grad u Srbiji, Mogućnost sistematske Implementacije, 2016. Izdavači: AINS Akademija inženjerskih nauka Srbije, PALGO Centar, ur. Borislav Stojkov, str. 75-83.
  • Pucar, M. (2019). „Nauka i praksa, stanje i perspektive razvoja gradova u svetlu klimatskih promena u Srbiji” Monografija: Gradovi Srbije u budućnosti, Tema 5: Uticaj klimatskih promena na gradove Srbije u budućnosti, Ur. Stojkov,B., Pantić, M., Akademija inženjerskih naika Srbije, (AINS), Srbija, str. 109-114.
  • Pucar, М., Pajević, М., Nenković, М (2005). Intelligent Buildings in Context of Energy Rationalization (Inteligentne zgrade u kontekstu energetske racionalizacije) International review Spatium, 12, 28-31.
  • Rogers, B. (2018). In defence of the realm: 10 principles for public space. Available on: https://www.lendlease.com/us/insights/20180913-in-defence-of-the-realm/ (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  • Sarkin, G. (2020). Cities at the Front Line: Public Space in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic. CIDOB: Barcelona, Spain. Available on: https://www.smithgroup.com/perspectives/2020/cities-at-the-front-line-public-space-in-the-time-of-the-covid-19 (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  • Sattarzadeh, D. (2018). The effect of designing urban public spaces on place attachment (case study: Tabriz, Iran). Space Ontology International Journal, 7(4), 53–64.
  • Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira A. (2011). Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation, J. Domingue et al. (eds.): Future Internet Assembly, LNCS 6656, pp. 435–436.
  • Sepe, M. (2013). Planning and Place in the City, Mapping Place Identity. Routledge: London-New York. Available on: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203076149/planning-place-city-marichela-sepe (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  • Sepe, M. (2014). Preserving, reconstructing and enhancing the place identity: identifying principles of urban sustainability with placemaker method. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 9(2), 277-300.
  • Sepe, M. (2016). The role of public space to achieve urban happiness. In book: Urban Regeneration and Sustainability,364-373.
  • Simonović Alfirević, S. &Alfirević, Đ. (2023). Architecture as an Instrument of Performative Practice. Facta Universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 21(3), 369-382.
  • Thompson, A. (2020). More Cycleways, Streets to Shut, Foot- Paths Widened under NSW’s COVID-19 Plan; The Sydney Morning Herald: Sydney, Australia. Available on: https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/more-cycleways-streets-to-shut (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  • Trawalter, S., Hofman, K., Palmer, L. (2021). Out of place: Socioeconomic status, use of public space, and belonging in higher education. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(1), 131–144.
  • Ujang, N., Kozlowski, M., Maulan, S. (2018). Linking place attachment and social interaction: Towards meaningful public places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 11(1), 115–129.
  • Živković, J., Lalović, K., Milojević, M., Nikezić. A. (2019). Multifunctional public open spaces for sustainable cities: concept and application, Facta universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 17(2), 205-219.
  • Živković, Ј., Lalović, K. and Milovanović-Rodić D. (2016). Multifunkcionalnost otvorenih prostora u kontekstu prilagođavanja gradova klimatskim promenama. U: M. Bajić-Brković (ed.), Klimatske promene, nacionalne politike i lokalni razvoj, pp. 125-155. Faculty of Architecture University of Belgrade, Belgrade.
  • Đukanović, & Živković J. (2015). Public Art & Public Space program: learning, but doing! ANNALES Anali za istrske in mediteranske studije-Series historia et sociologia, 25(1), 49-65.
  • Valdés, L. (2022). Getting public space right: transforming society from the ground up, Metropolis. Available on: https://www.metropolis.org/blog/getting-public-space-right-transforming-society-ground (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  • Verkeer, R., De Groot, H., Verhoff, E.T. (2004). Urban multifunctional land use: theoretical and empirical insights on economies of scale, scope and diversity. Built Environment, 30(4), 289–307.
  • Vesnić-Neđeral, Ž. (1991). Rekreativna funkcija otvorenih prostora grada. Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet, doktorska disertacija.
  • Wiggering, H., et al., (2006). Indicators for multifunctional land use: Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators, 6, 238–249.
  • Wiredu, Sh. (2018). The Importance of Public Spaces. Available on: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/importance-public-spaces-sheriff-wiredu (accessed on 25 July 2024).