COSTS OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW: INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN, FAIRNESS, AND THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE

ZBORNIK RADOVA  Međunarodno krivično pravo sa osvrtom na zaštitu životne sredine [str. 229-252]

 

AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Saša Đorđević

 
Download Full Pdf   

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/CrLawEnvP.229DJ

ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:

This article examines the costs of criminal proceedings in international criminal law through the lens of institutional design, procedural fairness, and political economy. Moving beyond purely budgetary considerations, it conceptualizes costs as structural elements that shape the operation and legitimacy of international criminal justice. The article traces the historical evolution of cost regimes from the post- World War II tribunals to the permanent International Criminal Court, highlighting how funding models influence procedural practices, defence resources, and victim participation. It argues that financial arrangements reflect normative choices regarding equality of arms, inclusiveness, and institutional autonomy, while also exposing international courts to political pressures from states. By analyzing defence funding, victim-related expenditures, and the externalization of costs to cooperating states, the article demonstrates that cost structures play a central role in balancing efficiency and fairness. It concludes by proposing institutional and procedural reforms aimed at enhancing sustainability without undermining fundamental fair trial guarantees.

KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI: 

International criminal law; costs of proceedings; International Criminal Court; equality of arms; victim participation; political economy of justice; defence funding; international tribunals

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / PROJEKAT:

REFERENCES / LITERATURA:

  • Akhavan, Payam. 2001. “Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?” American Journal of International Law 95 (1): 7–31.
  • Bohlander, Michael. 2007. International Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of Institutions and London: Cameron May.
  • Clark, Janine Natalya. 2014. International Trials and Reconciliation: Assessing the Impact of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. London: Routledge.
  • Combs, Nancy Amoury. 2010. Fact-Finding without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Parmentier Stephan; Drumbl, Mark 2016. Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law. Volume 5, Issue 5, November 2007, Pages 1215–1218.
  • Fairlie, Megan. 2004. “The Marriage of Common and Continental Law at the ICTY and Its Progeny.” International Criminal Law Review 4 (3): 243–319.
  • Ford, Stuart. 2012. “How Leadership Decapitation Contributes to the Effectiveness of International Criminal Tribunals.” 55 St. Louis U. L.J. 785–832.
  • Moffett, Luke. 2014. Justice for Victims before the International Criminal Court. London:
  • Peskin, Victor. 2012. International Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans: Virtual Trials and the Struggle for State Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Romano, Cesare R., André Nollkaemper, and Jann K. Kleffner, eds. 2004. Internationalized Criminal Courts: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schabas, William A. 2017. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stahn, Carsten. 2020. “Justice as Message: Expressivist Foundations of International Criminal Justice.” International Criminal Law Review 15 (3): 407–37.
  • Taylor, Telford. 2012. The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials. New York: Knopf.