ZATVORI U 21. VEKU: INSTITUCIONALNE PROMENE I VLADAVINA PRAVA

Zatvor u 21. veku više nije izolovana „kula” fizičke discipline, već kompleksno čvorište u kojem se prepliću napredna tehnologija, korporativni interesi i političke ambicije. Uvođenje digitalnog panoptikona i korektivnog menadžerizma dovelo je do efikasnije kontrole, ali i do značajne dehumanizacije. Tehnologija nudi revolucionarne alate za rehabilitaciju, ali istovremeno pretvara osuđenika u statistički podatak i faktor rizika. Kako koristiti tehnologiju da bi se pojedinac osnažio za povratak u društvo, a ne da bi se trajno žigosao kroz netransparentne algoritme, predstavlja izazov koji će značajno uticati na budućnost zatvorskih sistema. U radu se analizira evolucija zatvorskih institucija iz perspektive vladavine prava, istražujući prelazak sa retributivne pravde na rehabilitacione modele, uz kritički osvrt na izazove koje nameću digitalizacija, privatizacija i penalni populizam.

KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI: 

moderni zatvori, rehabilitacija, digitalni panoptikon, korektivni menadžerizam, privatizacija, penalni poulizam

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / PROJEKAT:

REFERENES / LITERATURA:

• Bilten – punoletni učinioci krivičnih dela u Republici Srbiji 2024, Republički zavod za statistiku, Beograd, 2025.
• Becker‐Pestka, D., E-learning for prisoners. experiences from Sweden, Norway, Poland, Finland and Germany, International Journal of Research in E-learning, 8(1) 2022.
• Bentham, J., An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, New York, 1948,
• Bennett, J., Prison managerialism. Handbook on Prisons, Jewkes, Z., Crewe, B., Bennett, J, ed. London, 2016.
• Boin, A., James, O., Lodge, M., The new public management ‘revolution’in political control of the public sector: promises and outcomes in three European prison systems. Public policy and administration, 21(2) 2006.
• Gaes, G., The effects of overcrowding in prison, Crime and Justice, 6/1985.
• Garland, D., The Meaning of Mass Imprisonment, Punishment & Socity, 3(1) 2005.
• Day, A., Tamatea, A., The politics of actuarial justice and risk assessment, In The Pre-Crime Society, Bristol, 2021.
• Gidens, E., Sociologija; Beograd; 2007.
• European Court of Human Rights. (2008). Case of Kafkaris v. Cyprus (Application no. 21906/04).
• European Court of Human Rights. (2013). Case of Vinter and Others v. The United Kingdom (Applications nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10).
• Liebling, A., Crewe, B., Prison Life, Penal Power and Prison Effects, The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Maguire, M., Morgan, R., Reiner, R. ed., Oxford, 2017.
• Lewis, S., Rehabilitation: Headline or Footnote in New Penal Strategy? Probation Journal, Vol. 52, 2005.
• Lurigio, A. J., The Golden Anniversary of Mass Incarceration in America,The Prison Journal, 104(3) 2024.
• Manokha, I., Surveillance, Panopticism, and Self-Discipline in the Digital Age,  Surveillance and Society, vol. 16, no. 2/2018.
• Makar, Z., The digital prison panopticon. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 38.4, 2025.
• Mahlangu, G., Zivanai, E., Offender eLearning: A systematic literature review on re-entry, recidivism, and life after prison. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2) 2023.
• Maruna, Sh., Making good: How ex-convicted reform and rebuild their lives, Washington DC, American Psychological Association.
• Morgan, R., Liebling, A., Imprisonment: An Expanding Scene;. Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th Maguire, M,. Morgan, R., Rainer, R. ed; Oxford, 2007.
• Morris, J. C., Government and Market Pathologies of Privatization: The Case of Prison Privatization1. Politics & Policy, 35/2007.
• McDougall, C., Pearson D. A. S., Technology as a means of rehabilitation: A measurable impact on reducing crime, Handbook of International Cybercrime and Cyberdeviance, Holt, T., Bossier, A., ed.  London, 2020.
• Noble, S. U., Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, NY, 2018.
• Pratt, J., Penal Populism, London-New York, 2007.
• Robinson, G., Late-Modern Rehabilitation: The Evolution of a Penal Strategy, Punishment and Society, Vol. 10/4, 2008.
• Robinson, G., Risk Management and Rehabilitation in the Probation Service: Collision and Collusion; The Howard Journal, 38 (4) 1999.
• Slipachyk, A., Human Dignity as A Fundamental Basis and A Practical Tool of “Right to Hope” in Criminal Law, ScienceRise: Juridical Science, 2021.
• Simon, J., Mass Incarceration: From Social Policy to Social Problem, The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections, Perersilia, J., Reitz, J., ed. London, 2012.
• Soković, S., Stanje u zatvorima u 21. veku : uzroci i efekti visoke inkarceracije. Zbornik radova: Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske unije, knj. 1, Kragujevac, 2013.
• Soković, S., Nova rehabilitacija : konceptualni i praktični okviri, Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. god. 52, br. 3/2014.
• Soković, S., Nova penologija : karakteristike i perspektive. Pravni život: list za pravna pitanja i praksu. knj. 547, br. 9/2011.
• Soković, S., Savremeni kazneni populizam: uzroci, odlike i posledice, Pravna riječ, 9, br. 33/2012.
• Shearing, C., Punishment and Changing Face of the Governance, Punishment & Society, Vol. 3/2, 2001.
• Trotter, S., Living with a sense of a right to hope, Social & Legal Studies 34.5 (2025).
• Trotter, S., Hope’s Relations: A Theory of the ‘Right to Hope’ in European Human Rights Law, Human Rights Law Review, 22/2022.
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2023). Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (The Nelson Mandela Rules).
• Fedorczyk, F., Navigating the dichotomy of smart prisons: between surveillance and rehabilitation, Law, Innovation and Technology 16.1 (2024).
• Fuko, M., Nadzirati i kažnjavati, Novi Sad, 1997.
• Haney C., Zimbardo, P., The Past and Future of U.S. Prison Policy: Twenty-Five Years After the Stanford Prison Experiment, American Psychologist, Vol. 53, No.7/1998.
• Cavadino, M., Dignan, J., Mair, G., The Penal System, An Introduction, London, 2013.
• Cornet, L. J. M.,Van Gelder, J. L., Virtual reality: a use case for criminal justice practice. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(7) 23020.
• Crewe, B., Liebling, A., Hulley, S., Staff‐prisoner relationships, staff professionalism, and the use of authority in public‐and private‐sector prisons. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(2) 2015.
• Crewe, B., Liebling, A., Quality, professionalism and the distribution of power in public and private sector prisons. In: The Private Sector and Criminal Justice, London, 2017.
• Cullen, F. T., Taking rehabilitation seriously:  Creativity,  science,  and  the challenge of offender change,  Punishment & Society, 14(1) 2012.
• Christie, N., Crime control as industry: Towards gulags, western style. London, 2016.