PRAVO NA DOBRU UPRAVU KAO SUBJEKTIVNO JAVNO PRAVO

Pravo na dobru upravu predstavlja savremeni pravni standard koji sve izraženije zauzima mesto u evropskom upravnom pravu, a naročito je normativno potvrđeno članom 41 Povelje o osnovnim pravima Evropske unije. Ovo pravo obuhvata skup procesnih garancija. Autori u radu ispituju da li pravo na dobru upravu ima karakter samostalnog subjektivnog javnog prava ili predstavlja skup izvedenih procesnih načela već sadržanih u postojećim normama upravnog postupka. Analiza obuhvata teorijski razvoj koncepta, njegov normativni sadržaj u pravu Evropske unije, kao i mogućnosti njegove primene i afirmacije u praksi Suda pravde Evropske unije. Pravo na dobru upravu poprima karakter danas subjektivnog javnog prava i stoga predstavlja mehanizam kojim se dolazi do danas osnovne ideje i principa na kojem Evropska unija počiva, a to je vladavina prava.  Cilj rada je da ukaže da pravo na dobru upravu prerasta iz političko-programskog načela u pravno obavezujući standard. Autori zaključuju da njegova puna afirmacija zavisi od dosledne sudske primene i jasnog normativnog prepoznavanja u nacionalnom zakonodavstvu. Time se doprinosi jačanju zaštite subjektivnih javnih prava i unapređenju vladavine prava u savremenoj upravi.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ: 

pravo na dobru upravu, savremena javna uprava, vladavina prava, subjektivno javno pravo,  Povelja EU o temeljnim pravima

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / ПРОЈЕКАТ:

REFERENES / ЛИТЕРАТУРA:

• Alon-Barkat, S., Busuioc, M., Human–AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision Making: “Automation Bias” and “SelectiveAdherence” to Algorithmic Advice,  Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 33, no. 1/2023.
• Agarwal, P. K., Public Administration Challenges in the World of AI and Bots, Public Admin Rev, 78/2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12979; 
• Andrews, L., Public administration, public leadership and the construction of public value in the age of the algorithm and ‘big data, Public Admin, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12534;
• Afzal, M., Panagiotopoulos, P., How Public Officials Perceive Algorithmic Discretion: A Study of Status Quo Bias in Policing, Public Administration Review, 85, no. 5/2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13957;
• Afzal, M., Panagiotopoulos, P., Data in Policing: AnIntegrative Review, International Journal of Public Administration, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692. 2024.2360586;
• Adamidis, V., Democracy, populism, and the rule of law: A reconsideration of their interconnectedness, Politics, 44(3) 2024.
• Alishani, A., Homburg, V., Velsberg, O., Public Encounters and Government Chatbots: When Servers Talk to Citizens, Public Administration Review, 86, no. 1/2026. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70005
• Aviani, D., Kontrola uprave putem pučkog pravobranitelja, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 2016.
• Bruce, M., The Burden of Proof in Taxation Disputes: Does Section 170 or Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Offend the Rule of Law? Federal Law Review, 52(1) 2024.
• Barrett, K., Greene, R., As the Quantity of Data Explodes, Quality Matters, International Journal of Public Administration, 46(16) 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01900692.2023.2197171
• Bouwmeester, M., Checks and balances under pressure in the welfare state: Disentangling the rule of law risks of automation and welfare conditionality,  European Journal of Social Security, 27(2) 2025.
• Bartle, J. R., Let Us Be Guided by the Light of Progress, Public Admin Rev, 86: 2026. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70089;
• Britvić Vetma, B., Malenica, I., Načelo zakonitosti u hrvatskom i poredbenom upravnom pravu, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, vol. 44, br. 1/2023. 
• Bertelli, A. M., Cannas, S., Sharova, K., Uriarte, I., Anchoring Institutional Values in Democracy: A Systematic Review, a Constructive Critique, and a Research Agenda,  Public Administration Review, 86, no. 1/2026. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70036.
• Bovens, M., Zouridis, S., From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control, Public Administration Review, 62/2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00168;
• Baris, O. F., Pelizzo, R., Research Note: Governance Indicators Explain Discrepancies in COVID-19 Data, World Affairs, 183(3) 2020.
• Busuioc, M., Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account,  Public Admin Rev, 81/2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13293
• Broeders, D., Schrijvers, E., van der Sloot, B., van Brakel, R., de Hoog, J., Hirsch Ballin, E., Big Data and security policies: Towards a framework for regulating the phases of analytics and use of Big Data, Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 33, Issue 3, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.002;
• Bauer, M. W., Authoritarian Drift, Variegated Paths: Mapping Administrative Transformation Strategies Under Illiberal Rule, Public Administration Review, 85, no. 6/2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70028;
• Bordás, P., The Role of State-owned Enterprises in the European Union, HKJU-CCPA, 25(2) 2025. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.25.2.6;
• Vlaški B., Sadržina i prav(n)a priroda koncepta dobre uprave, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Nišu, br. 71/2015. 
• Vogl, T. M., Seidelin, C., Ganesh, B., Bright, J., Smart Technology and the Emergence of Algorithmic Bureaucracy: Artificial Intelligence in UK Local Authorities, Public Admin Rev, 80/2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13286;
• Van Toorn, G., Henman, P., Soldatić, K., Introduction to the digital welfare state: Contestations, considerations and entanglements, Journal of Sociology, 60(3) 2024.
• Gules-Guctas, E., How Do Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems Used in Public Benefits Determinations Fail? Insights From Legal Challenges, Public Administration Review, 86, no. 2/2026. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70043
• Deng, Y., Sun, Y., How Does the Usage of Artificial Intelligence Affect Felt Administrative Accountability of Street-Level Bureaucrats? The Mediating Effect of Perceived Discretion, Public Management Review, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14719 037.2024.2370982.
• De Boer, N., Raaphorst, N., Automation and Discretion: Explaining the Effect of Automation on How Street-Level Bureaucrats Enforce, Public Management Review 25, no. 1/2023.
• De Mattos Donadelli, F. M., Scott, J. R., Dynamics of Public Administration Reform Processes: Contrasting Top-Down Purity and Meso-Level Managerial Bricolage Reform in New Zealand, Public Administration Review, 85, no. 6/2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13948.
• Dunne, N., Public Interest and EU Competition Law, The Antitrust Bulletin, 65(2) 2020.
• DeCanio, S. J., AI recognition of differences among book-length texts, AI & Society, 35(1) 2018.
• Đerđa, D., Pičuljan, Z., Novo hrvatsko opće upravnopostupovno pravo, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, (1991) v. 30, br. 1/2009.
• Đerđa, D., Načelo razmjernosti u donošenju upravnih odluka, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 37 (1) 2016.
• Đerđa, D., Pravila upravnog postupka u europskom pravu, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, (1991) v. 33, br. 1/2012.
• Erman, E., Furendal, M., Artificial Intelligence and the Political Legitimacy of Global Governance, Political Studies, 72(2) 2024.
• Ikdahl, I. Eriksen, C. C., The administrative architecture of a Norwegian social security scandal, European Journal of Social Security, 27(2) 2025.
• Ingrams, A., Administrative Reform and the Quest for Openness: A Popperian Review of Open Government, Administration & Society, 52(2), 2020.
• Jovanović, Z., Izazovi i trendovi u upravljanju ljudskim resursima u javnoj upravi, Zbornik radova: XXI vek – vek usluga i uslužnog prava, knj. 6, Kragujevac 2015.
• Jovanović Z., Uticaj ombudsmana (zaštitnika građana) na delatnost javnih službi, Zbornik radova: XXI vek – vek usluga i uslužnog prava, knj. 2, Kragujevac 2011;
• Jovanović, Z., Vučinić, D., Stranke u upravnom postupku pozitivno-pravni aspekt sa osvrtom na pojedine zemlje bivše SFRJ, Zbornik radova: Pravo, tradicija i promjene, Istočno Sarajevo 2020.
• Jovanović, Z., Aktuelni reformski procesi u javnoj upravi i globalizacija, Administracija i javne politike, god. IV br. 3/2018.
• Jovanović, Z., Digitalni portali organa uprave, Zbornik radova: Izazovi i otvorena pitanja Uslužnog prava, Kragujevac, 2024.
• Jerinić, J., Vučetić, D., Stanković, M., Priručnik za sprovođenje principa dobrog upravljanja na lokalnom nivou, Beograd, 2020.
• Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E., The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines,  Nature Machine Intelligence, 1 (9) 2019.
• Kovač, P., Babšek, M., Aristovnik, A., The Artificial Intelligence Act Between the EU and National Levels: The Slovenian Case Study, HKJU-CCPA, 25(3) 2025.  https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.25.3.6;
• Koprić, I., Novi Zakon o općem upravnom postupku iz 2009. – tradicija ili modernizacija, Zbornik radova: Modernizacija općeg upravnog postupka i javne uprave u Hrvatskoj, Zagreb, 2009.
• Košnica, I., Prava građana u Krbekovoj doktrini upravnog prava, Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava: časopis za teoriju i praksu javne uprave, vol. 25, br. 3/2025.
• Kovačević-Kuštrimović, R., Podela subjektivnih prava i njen značaj, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Nišu, 23/1983.
• …