XIII Međunarodno naučno-stručno savetovanje Ocena stanja, održavanje i sanacija građevinskih objekata (str. 304-315)
АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Radomir Folić,
Miloš Čokić, Boris Folić
Download Full Pdf 
DOI: 10.46793/SGISXIII.30RF
САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:
Most of the existing buidnings, which dont fulfill the curent seismic requirement, may suffer extensive damage or even collapse in severe eartquake. This paper analyses some recommendations for the inspection and assessment of the condition of concrete buildings after an earthquake. Some damage classifications and their impact on the safety and usability of buildings are commented. It also includes literature/sources from countries that are often affected by strong earthquakes, USA, Japan; India, Turkey and others. Recommendations for the evaluation of buildings that were not designed according to current regulations were analysed. Seismic energy dissipation, during the main and aftershocks of the earthquake, was analyzed on the example of the multi-story RC building. Based on the review of the literature and the aforementioned analyses, some recommendations for evaluation are listed as a basis for making a decision on rehabilitation and/or strengthening of building, or their removal.
КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:
RC buildings, earthquake, damage, evaluataion, safety, performance, usability
ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:
[1] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Standard ASCE/SEI 41-17, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, 2017.
[2] ASCE 31-03: Seismic evaluation of existing buildings, Reston, 2002.
[3] ATC-40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Volume 1, Applied Technology Council, Report No. SSC 96-01, November 1996.
[4] Building Construction under Seismic Conditions in the Balkan Regions, Vol. 4: Post-earthquake damage evaluation and strength assessment of buildings under seismic conditions, UNDP, Vienna, 1985.
[5] Choi, H. Sanada, Y. Kashawa, H. Watanabe, Y. Tunjung, J. Jiang, H.>Seismic response estimation meyhod for earthquake-damged RC buildings, Eartquake Engineering&Structural Dynamics. 2016, 45: 999-1018.
[6] EC 8: Part 3: Strengthening and Repair of Buildings, CEN, 2005.
[7] El-Beter, S.A.: Seismic vulnerability evaluation of eisting RC buildings, HBRC Journal (2018) 14, 189-197.
[8] Erdem, T. R. Karal, K.: Performance evaluation and strengthening of reinforced concrete buildings, Revista de lla Construccion, Journal of Construccion, 21(1), 53-68.
[9] Fardis, M.N. Panagiotakos, T. B. Biskinis, D. Kosmopoulos, A.: Seismic assessment of existing RC buildings, in S.T. Wasti and G. Ozcebe (eds.), Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, 215–244.
[10] FEMA 356: Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, 2000. FEMA-306; Evaluation of Earthq. Damaged Concrete and Masonry wall Buildings, 1999.
[11] FEMA P-58-1, Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Volume 1–Methodology; FEMA P-58-2, Volume 2 – Implementation Guide, ATC, September 2012.
[12] Folić, R.: Classification of damage to structures and their respective causes in Earthquake, Structural Faults and Repair, Proc. Ed. M. Forde, London 1989.
[13] Folić, R.: Performance based seismic design of concrete buildings structures – bases, International Conference 24. April, GF Subotica, april, 2015, pp. 205-214.
[14] Folić B. Seizmička analiza betonski konstrukcija fundiranih na šipovima. Doktorska disertacija. FTN Univerzitet u Novom Sadu. 2017. str.515.
[15] Folić, R. Čokić, M. Folić, B. Liolios, A. Seismic damage and fragility of RC Buildings, XXIII International Scientific Conference VSU’2023, 22-24 June 2023, Sofia
[16] Folić, R., Čokić, M., Folić, B., Brujić, Z.: Damage assessment, fragility, and vulnerability analysis of reinforced concrete building, Građevinar, 75 (2023) 6, pp. 591-606, doi: https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.3623.2022
[17] Ghobarah, A., Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of Development, Engineering Structures 23, 2001, pp. 878–884.
[18] Kocer, M. Unal, A.: RC Structural Damages Observed after 30.10.2020 Seferihisar-IZMIR Earthquake and Analytical Evaluation Eisting Sample RC Buidings, 15 March 2022, Preprint (Vers. 1), Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1180428/v1]
[19] Maeda, M. Nishida, T. Matsukawa, K. Murakami, M.: Revision of Guideline for Post – Earthquake Damge Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buidings in Japan, 16th WCEE 2017, Santiago Chile, January 9-13, 2017; Paper No. 3987
[20] Maeda, M., Matsukawa, K., An overview of post-earthquake damage and residual capacity evaluation for reinforced concrete buildings in Japan, Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Annual NZSEE Conf., Paper 288, 2019
[21] Moehle, J.: Earthquake collapse risk of older concrete buildings, Proc. Luis Garcia Symposiu, January 2008.
[22] Penelis, G. G. Panelis, G. G. Concrete Buildings in Seismic Regions, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, London, 2014.
[23] Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildins: A Practical Approach, https//lit.in (accesed 30.04.2024)
[24] Seismic Evaluation of Older Concrete Buildings for Collapse Potential FEMA P-2018.
[25] Suquilo, B. Rojas, F. Massone, L.M.: Seismic Perfromace Evaluation of a Chilean RC Biding damged during the Mw8.8 Chile Earthquake, MDPI Buildings, 2024, 14, 1028
[26] Usta, P. Bozdag, O. Onat, O.: Seismic Performance Evaluation of RC Buildings using irregularity basde indices, Technical Gazette 29, 4 (2022), 1362-1371.
[27] Xue, Q. et al.: Post-earthquake loss assessment based on structural component damage inspection for residential RC buildings, Engineering Structures, 31 (2009), pp. 2947-2953.
[28] ETABS, version 17, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California, USA, 2018.
[29] EN 1990. ICS 91.010.30, Basis of Structural Design; European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2005
[30] EN1991, Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures—Part 1-1: General Actions—Densities, Self-weight, Imposed Loads for Buildings; European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2002
[31] EN1992—Part 1, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings; CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2004
[32] EN1998—Part 1, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings; European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
[33] Engineering Strong Motion Database, https://esm-db.eu/
[34] Hazus®-MH 2.1. Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, Advanced Engineering Building Module (AEBM), Technical and User’s Manual; Department of Homeland Security, FEMA, Mitigation Division: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
[35] SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee. Performance-based Seismic Engineering; Structural Engineers Association of California: Sacramento, CA, USA, 1995.