XIII Međunarodno naučno-stručno savetovanje Ocena stanja, održavanje i sanacija građevinskih objekata (str. 77-84)
АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Ivan Milojković 
DOI: 10.46793/SGISXIII.06IM
САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:
Prikazuju se predmet, obim i način sprovedenih istražnih radova za definisanje pozicija i stanja podzemnih instalacija za evakuaciju otpadnih voda u okviru TEKO A. Takođe su navedeni i Zakonski okviri za sprovedene istražne radove, vrste radova i tehnički uslovi. U okviru elektrane TEKO A postoji delom separacioni sistem kanalizacije, koga čine:
– Interna kanalizacija opšteg tipa (atmosferske, sanitarne i deo tehnoloških otpadnih voda);
– Kanali za povratnu rashladnu vodu;
– Zauljena kanalizacija na prostoru naftne stanice i pretakališta.
КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:
Kanalizacija, sanacija, TEKO A,AHP,VIKOR, Fuzzy
ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:
[1] Abu-Taleb, M.F., Mareschal, B. Water resources planning in the Middle East: Application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. European Journal of Operational Research, 81, 1995, 500–511
[2] Athawale, V.M., Chakraborty, S..Facility Layout Selection Using PROMETHEE II Method. The IUP Journal of Operations Management, 9(1-2), 2010, 81–98
[3] del Cano, A.; de la Cruz, M. P.; Gomez, D.; Perez, M. Fuzzy method for analyzing uncertainty in the sustainable design of concrete structures, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 22(7), 2016, 924–935. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.928361
[4] Institut za vodoprivredu „Jaroslav Černi“ ,Beograd, ELABORAT – STRUČNO MIŠLJENJE O STANJU CEVOVODA SA PREDLOGOM INTERVENCIJA za „SNIMANJE PODZEMNIH, TUNELSKIH I KANALSKIH INSTALACIJA NA LOKACIJI TEKO A“, 2021
[5] Jaskowski, P.; Biruk, S.; Bucon, R. Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method applica- tion in group decision environment, Automation in Construction 19, 2010, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.014
[6] Jevtic, M., Milojkovic, I., Stojnic, N. Research of the performance of pulse electrohydrodynamics in blockage removal, Water Science & Technology, 64.1, 2011, 102-108
[7] Kessili, A., Benmamar, S. Prioritizing sewer rehabilitation projects using AHP-PROMETHEE II ranking method. Water Science & Technology, 73(2), 2016, 283–291
[8] Milojković, I., Despotović, J., Karanović, I. Model for Maintenance of Sewerage System based on Inspection. IWA 7th Eastern European Young Water Professionals Conference, 17-19 September 2015, Belgrade, Serbia, Publisher: IWA – International Water Association, 2015, 538-543
[9] Milojković, I., Romanović, I. Analiza varijantnih rešenja rekonstrukcije KCS „Železnička stanica“ metodom PROMETHEE, 39. Međunarodni stručno-naučni skup „Vodovod i kanalizacija ’18“, Valjevo, 09–12.10.2018., Izdavač: Savez inženjera i tehničara Srbije, ISBN 978-86-80067-39-1, 2018, 121-126
[10] Milojković, I. Uporedna analiza varijantnih rešenja rekonstrukcije KCS „Železnička stanica“ metodama VIKOR i PROMETHEE, 40. Međunarodna konferencija „Vodovod i kanalizacija ’19“, Novi Sad, 01.–04.10.2019., Izdavač: Savez inženjera i tehničara Srbije, ISBN 978-86-80067-42-1, 2019a, 322-327
[11] Milojković, I. Uporedna analiza prečišćavanja industrijskih otpadnih voda u HE „Đerdap 1“ metodama VIKOR i PROMETHEE, 48. konferencija o aktuelnim temama korišćenja i zaštite voda „VODA 2019“, 04.-06. jun 2019., Zlatibor, Izdavač: Srpsko društvo za zaštitu voda, Beograd, ISBN 978-86-916753-5-6, 2019b, 329-338
[12] Opricović, S. Compromise in Cooperative Game and the Vikor Method Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research. Volume 19. Number 2., 2009, 225-238.
DOI:10.2298/YUJOR0902225O https://doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?ID=0354-02430902225O
[13] Pan, N. F. Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method, Automation in Construction 17:, 2008, 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.03.005
[14] Polat, G. Subcontractor selection using the integration of the AHP and PROMETHEE methods, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 22(8), 2016, 1042–1054. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.948910
[15] Prascevic, N.; Prascevic, Z. Application of fuzzy AHP method on eigenvalues for decision making in construction industry, Technical Gazette 23(1), 2016, 57–64.
[16] Prascevic, N., Prascevic, Z. APPLICATION OF FUZZY AHP FOR RANKING AND SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT, JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, ISSN 1392-3730 / eISSN 1822-3605, Volume 23(8), 2017, 1123–1135 https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1388278
[17] Savić, A.D. The use of data-driven methodologies for prediction of water and wastewater asset failures, Centre for Water Systems, University of Exeter, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QF, United Kingdom, Chapter published in the Springer book: Risk Management of Water Supply and Sanitation Systems, 2009, 181-190
[18] Taylan, O.; Bafail, A. O.; Abdulaal, R. M. S.; Kabli, M. R. Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies, Applied Soft Computing 17, 2014, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003