CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES USING INNOVATIVE GEODETIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES

SGIS – Četrnaesto međunarodno naučno-stručno savetovanje „Ocenja stanja, održavanje i sanacija građevinskih objekata“ (2026) [73-80]

 

AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Mileva Samardžić-Petrović

 

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/SGIS26s.073SP

ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:

Structural condition assessment is vital for safety and long‑term performance of civil engineering structures. Geodetic measurement techniques provide precise data on geometry, position, and deformation, and are increasingly integrated into multidisciplinary monitoring systems. The choice of method depends on scale, scope, accuracy, and monitoring frequency. Geodetic techniques—LiDAR, UAV photogrammetry, GNSS, InSAR, and robotic total stations—provide precise data for geometry and deformation, enabling both periodic and real‑time monitoring. These techniques complement visual inspections, support dimensional analysis, and establish permanent monitoring frameworks. Recent advances emphasize integration with IoT, sensor networks, digital twins, and machine learning, enabling automated data processing and real‑time reliability checks. This multidisciplinary approach provides a robust framework for continuous structural health monitoring, ensuring accurate detection of deformations and supporting effective maintenance planning.

KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI: 

geodetic measurements; structural health monitoring; LiDAR; GNSS; InSAR; UAV photogrammetry; IoT.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / PROJEKAT:

REFERENES / LITERATURA:       

  • Biondini, F., Frangopol, D. M.: Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structural systems under uncertainty, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(9), F4016001.
  • CEN/TS/17440:020 Assessment and retrofitting of existing structures, 2020, Brussels European Committee for Standardization.
  • Faqih, F., Zayed, T., Soliman, E.: Factors and defects analysis of physical and environmental condition of buildings, Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, 2020., 5(1), page 19.
  • Hu, K., Chen, Z., Kang, H., Tang, Y.: 3D vision technologies for a self-developed structural external crack damage recognition robot, Automation in Construction, 2024, 159, 105262.
  • Kaartinen, E., Dunphy, K., Sadhu, A.: LiDAR-based structural health monitoring: Applications in civil infrastructure systems, Sensors, 2022, 22(12), 4610.
  • Koohmishi, M., Kaewunruen, S., Chang, L., Guo, Y.: State-of-the-art technologies integrated with InSAR: A focus on structural health monitoring of railway infrastructure, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2026,
  • Li, X., Zhou, L., Ma, J., Wang, C., Pan, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, D., He, M.: Multi-scale deformation monitoring and characterization of large-span railway bridge by joint satellite/ground-based InSAR and BDS, Measurement, 2025, 256, p.118199.
  • Liu, S., Isobe, K., Si, J., Li, D., Ren, D.: A multi-module deep learning framework with graph-based network and crack attention for tunnel lining crack segmentation from LiDAR point cloud, Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 494, 143383.
  • Lorenz, R., Petryna, Y., Lubitz, C., Lang, O., Wegener, V.: Thermal deformation monitoring of a highway bridge: combined analysis of geodetic and satellite-based InSAR measurements with structural simulations, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2024, 14(5), 1237-1255.
  • Lou, Y., Meng, S., Zhou, Y.: Deep learning-based three-dimensional crack damage detection method using point clouds without color information, Structural Health Monitoring, 2025, 24(2), 657-675 .
  • Mardanshahi, A., Sreekumar, A., Yang, X., Barman, S.K. and Chronopoulos, D.: Sensing techniques for structural health monitoring: A state-of-the-art review on performance criteria and new-generation technologies, Sensors, 2025, 25(5), p.1424.
  • Peng, S., Zhao, B., Cao, J., Xu, W., Fu, C., Jirawattana-somkul, T., Gong, F., A review of machine learning-based methods for concrete crack detection, Journal of Intelligent Construction, 2026.
  • Pimentel de Figueiredo, R., Eriksen, S. N., Rodriguez, I., Bøgh, S.: A Complete System for Automated Semantic–Geometric Mapping of Corrosion in Industrial Environments, Automation, 2025, 6(2), 23.
  • Pravilnik o sadržini i načinu osmatranja ponašanja tla i objekata tokom građenja i upotrebe, Sl. glasnik RS“, br. 93/2011.
  • Pravilnik o sadržini i načinu vršenja tehničkog pregleda objekta, sastavu komisije, sadržini predloga komisije o utvrđivanju podobnosti objekta za upotrebu, osmatranju tla i objekta u toku građenja i upotrebe i minimalnim garantnim rokovima za pojedine vrste objekata, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 27/2015, 29/2016, 78/2019, 6/2024, 121/2025 i 24/2026.
  • Pravilnik o sadržini, načinu i postupku izrade i načinu vršenja kontrole tehničke dokumentacije prema klasi i nameni objekata, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 96/2023.
  • Pravilnik za građevinske konstrukcije, Sl. glasnik RS“, br. 89/2019, 52/2020 i 122/2020.
  • Ratay, R. T. (Ed.): Structural Condition Assessment, ASCE Press, 2005, 712 pages.
  • Ruiz-Armenteros, A.M., Marchamalo-Sacristán, M., Lamas-Fernández, F., Hernández-Cabezudo, Á., Fernández-Landa, A.: Delgado-Blasco, J.M., Bakon, M., Lazecky, M., Perissin, D., Papco, J., Corral, G., Integrated monitoring of dams and large ponds: the role of satellite radar interferometry and the European ground motion service, Applied Geomatics, 2025, 17(2), pp.379-392.
  • Selvakumaran, S., Rossi, C., Marinoni, A., Webb, G., Bennetts, J., Barton, E., Middleton, C.: Combined InSAR and terrestrial structural monitoring of bridges, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(10), 7141-7153.
  • Straub, A.: Dutch standard for condition assessment of buildings, Structural Survey, 2009, 27(1), pp.23-35.
  • Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji, Sl. glasnik RS’, br. 72/2009, 81/2009 – ispr., 64/2010 – odluka US, 24/2011, 121/2012, 42/2013 – odluka US, 50/2013 – odluka US, 98/2013 – odluka US, 132/2014, 145/2014, 83/2018, 31/2019, 37/2019 – dr. zakon, 9/2020, 52/2021, 62/2023 i 91/2025.