ОДРЖИВИ УРБАНИ РАЗВОЈ ИЗМЕЂУ КОНЦЕПТА И ПРАКСЕ – СОЦИОЛОШКА ПЕРСПЕКТИВА

Одрживи развој : вектор Србије ка будућности (2024), str. 249-259

АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S):  Мина Петровић

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/82154-04-4.249P

САЖЕТАК /ABSTRACT:

Свођење одрживог развоја на еколошку модернизацију проблематизује се због суштинског запостављана социјалних аспеката одрживости и одвраћања пажње од структурних узрока еколошких проблема у капиталистичком поретку, чиме императив економског раста остаје неупитан. Неолиберална стратегија озелењавања капитализма посматра се кроз урбану перспективу развијених и мање развијених земаља, са посебним освртом на Србију односно Београд. Лимити достизања одрживости градова у оквирима предузетничке урбане политике и еколошке модернизације илустровани су на искуству развијених евопских земаља током пандемије ковида 19, док је на искуству постстоцијалистичких градова Европе односно Србије указано на препреке у спровођењу стандарда одрживости које примењују развијене земаље. У закључку се проблематизује потенцијално унапређење одрживог развоја у светлу анализираних ограничења фокусом на обнављање комуникативне функције просторног планирања односно на радикализацију потенцијала партиципативног поступка, кооптираног у предузетнички модел управљања окружењем/градовима.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS: 

одрживи развој, еколошка модернизација, град

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:

  •  
  • Accornero, G.. 2020. ‘Stay Home Without a Home’: Report from a webinar on the right to housing in Covid-19 lockdown times. Radical Housing Journal, Vol 2(1): 197-201.
  • Aksentijević, M., Timotijević, J. 2021. Beograd raste i nastaviće da raste. Beograd: Institut za urbane politike/Minsitarstvo rostora.
  • Angiello, G. 2021. Toward greener and pandemic-proof cities? Policy responses to COVID-19 outbreak in four global cities. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 14 (2): 285-292.
  • Barnett, C. 2014. What Do Cities Have to Do with Democracy? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5): 2014 1625–43.
  • Bauman, Zigmund. 2001. Consuming Life, Journal of Consumer Culture. 1(1): 9-29.
  • Beck, U. 2000. Living Your Own Life in a Runaway World: Individualization, Globalization and Politics. In: Hutton, W., Giddens, A. (eds.), Global Capitalism. New York: The New Press
  • Beck, U. 2008. World at Risk, 1st edition, Polity Press.
  • Beck, U. 2009. Critical Theory of World Risk Society: A Cosmopolitan Vision. Constellations 16 (1): 3-22.
  • Blokland, T. et al. 2015. Urban citizenship and right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4): 655-665.
  • Borras, S., Franco, J. 2013. Global Land Grabbing and Political Reactions ‘From Below’. Third World Quarterly, 34(9): 1723–1747.
  • Brand, P., Thomas, M. Urban environmentalism: global change and the mediation of local conflict. Routledge.
  • Brenner, N., Schmid, C.. 2015. Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2-3): 151-182.
  • Bukvić, Z. Bicikl između urbanog planiranja i politike. U: Čukuć, Iva., Timotijević, Jelena., Radovanović, Ksenija. (ur). Ka drugačijem gradu 3, str. 56-67. Beograd: Mikro Art.
  • Cole, H., et al. 2021. The COVID-19 pandemic: power and privilege, gentrification, and urban environmental justice in the global north, Cities & Health, 5:sup1, S71-S75,
  • Cox, P. Vélomobility is to degrowth as automobility is to growth: prefigurative cycling imaginaries. Applied Mobilities, 8(3): 265–285.
  • Davis, M. 2010. Who will build the ark? New Left Review, 61: 29–46
  • Domaradzka, A. 2018. Urban Social Movements and the Right to the City: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Urban Mobilization. Voluntas 29, 607–620.
  • Đokić, J. et al. 2023. Razorni trendovi srpskog urbanizma: Demontaža planiranja u nekoliko koraka. Beograd: Nova planska praksa.
  • Evans, J. et al. 2020. COVID-19 and the challenge of crisis urbanism. University of Manchester Global Development Institute. https:/www. gdi.manchester.ac.uk/mui/2020/06/08/covid-and-the-challenge-of-crisis-urbanism-james-evans-and-karen-lucas/
  • Finbom, M. et al. 2021. Public transport qualities and inequalities in pandemic times. In P. Filion, B. Doucet, i R.V. Melik (eds.), Global Reflections on COVID-19 and Urban Inequalities. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  • Fainstein, Susan. 2016. Financialisation and justice in the city: A commentary. Urban Studies, 53(7): 1503–1508.
  • Fainstein, S. The Just City. Cornell University Press.
  • Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Kesselring, S.. 2021. What is the urban without physical mobilities? COVID-19-induced immobility in the mobile risk society. Mobilities, 16(1): 81–95.
  • Ferenčuhová, S., Gentile, M. 2016. Introduction: Postsocialist cities and urban theory, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(4-5): 483-496.
  • Gillespie, T., Hardy, K.. 2020. All in this together? How a decade of austerity cleared the way for Covid-19 in deprived urban areas. University of Manchester Global Development Institute. https:/www.gdi.manchester.ac.uk/decade-of-austerity-cleared-the-way-for-covid-19-in-deprived-urban-areas/
  • Haase, A. COVID-19 as a Social Crisis and Justice Challenge for Cities. Frontiers in Sociology, 5: 583638.
  • Harvey, D. 1989. The Urban Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Harvey, D. The ‘New’ Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession. The Socialist Register, 40: 63–87.
  • Harvey, D. Spaces of Global Capitalism. A Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Verso.
  • Harvey, D. The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.
  • Krellenberg, K., Koch, F. 2021. Conceptualizing Interactions between SDGs and Urban Sustainability Transformations in Covid-19 Times, Politics and Governance, 9(1): 200–210.
  • Leary-Owhin, M. Exploring the production of urban space. Bristol University Press.
  • Lefebvre, H.. 1991. The production of space. Oxford UK: Blackwell.
  • Lefebvre, H. 2009. ‘Reflections on the Politics of Space’, in Brenner, Neil., Elden, Stuart (eds). State, Space, World: Selected Essays/Henri Lefebvre, 167-184. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Liviu, C., Druţǎ, O. The Specter of Zombie Socialism and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Post-Socialist Central and Eastern Europe. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57(4): 1–24.
  • Luke, T. 1999. Eco-managerialism: environmental studies as a power/knowledge formation. Living with nature: Environmental politics as cultural discourse, pp. 103-120.
  • Mayer, M. 2016. Neoliberal Urbanism and Uprisings Across Europe. In: Mayer, M., Thörn, C., Thörn, H. (eds) Urban Uprisings. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • Mayer, M. ‘The ‘Right to the City’ in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements’. City,13(2): 362— 374.
  • McMichael, P. Rethinking Land Grab Ontology. Rural Sociology, 79(1): 34–55.
  • Moore, J.. 2011. Transcending the Metabolic Rift: A Theory of Crises in the Capitalist World-Ecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(1): 1–46.
  • Nikolaeva, A. et al. 2021. What does it mean to be less mobile? Insights from COVID-19 lockdown. CUS Working Paper Series, 52 Centre for Urban Studies, University of Amsterdam.
  • Oldenziel, R. et al. 2016. Cycling cities: The European experience. Eindhoven and Munich: Foundation for the History of Technology and Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society.
  • Petrović, M., Pešić, J. Potentials and Obstacles for the Transnationalisation of Recent Environmental Struggles in Serbia, Sociologija i prostor, 61(2): 227 (397-422).
  • Petrović, M., Vukelić, J. Iskustvo gradova tokom pandemije kovida 19: I šta ćemo sada? Sociologija, 65(2): 173-196.
  • Petrović, M. Post-socialist Housing Policy Transformation in Yugoslavia and Belgrade. European Journal of Housing Policy, 1(2): 211–231.
  • Piletić, A. 2023. Renewable energy and EU-led authoritarian neoliberalization: small hydropower in Rakita, Serbia and the upscaling of environmental struggles. Globalizations, 1-16.
  • Pierson, E. et al. 2021. Mobility network models of COVID-19 explain inequities and inform reopening, Nature, Vol. 589.
  • Purcell, M. Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements? Planning Theory, 8(2): 140-165.
  • Radovanović, K. et al. Zaštita prava na učešće u odlučivanju o budućnosti kao javni interes. U: Milovanović, Danijela i dr. (ur.) U potrazi za javnim interesom: dometi urbanizma, 147-171. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Arhitektonski fakultet.
  • Ruddick, S. et al. 2017. Planetary urbanization: An urban theory for our time? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space.
  • Ruddick, S. 2015. Situating the Anthropocene: planetary urbanization and the anthropological machine, Urban Geography, 36(8): 1113–
  • Savage, M. 2000. Class Analysis and Social Transformation. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Sekulić, D. 2019. On Hidden Power. U: Čukuć, Iva., Timotijević, Jelena., Radovanović, Ksenija. (ur.). Ka drugačijem gradu 3, 116-132. Beograd: Mikro Art.
  • Sheller, M. 2021. Mobility Justice and the Return of Tourism after the Pandemic, Mondes du Tourisme, 19: 34-63.
  • Siff, Ej et al. 2020. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a sociological review. Epidemiology and Infection 148, e242, 1–5.
  • Soja, E. 2009. Edward Soja, “Taking Space Personally”, U: Warf, B., Arias, S. (eds). Spatial Turn, 11-35, New York, Routledge.
  • Tomka, G. 2018. Prilozi borbi za održivi grad. U: Čukić, I. (ur.). Ka drugačijem gradu 2, 27-53. Beograd: Mikro art.
  • Urry, John. 2004. The ‘System’ of Automobility. Theory, Culture and Society, 21(4-5):25-39.
  • Žižek, Slavoj. 2009. Ecology – A New Opium for the Masses, Nextnature.net Dostupno na: https://www.nextnature.net/2009/02/ecology-a- new-opium- for-the- masses/
  • Van Gent, W., Hochstenbach, Cody. 2020. The neo-liberal politics and socio-spatial implications of Dutch post-crisis social housing policies. International Journal of Housing Policy, 20(1): 156–172. Venturini, F., Deirmenci, E., Morales, I. (eds) 2019. Social Ecology and the Right to the City – Towards Ecological and Democratic Cities. Black Rose Books.
  • Wachsmuth, D., Brenner, N. 2014. Introduction to Henri Lefebvre’s “Dissolving city, planetary metamorphosis” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32: 199 – 202.
  • Wheeler, S. 2003. Planning for Sustainability. Creating Livable, Equitable and Ecological Communities. London-New York: Routledge.