Mechanisms Supporting the Clinical Benefits of Hemodiafiltration: A Comprehensive Review

7th International Congress of Cardionephrology KARNEF (2025) [pp. 138-158]

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Bernard Canaud

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/KARNEF25.144C

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

Background: Online hemodiafiltration (OHDF) is an advanced kidney replacement therapy (KRT) that enhances uremic toxin clearance and offers cardiovascular benefits over conventional high-flux hemodialysis (HD), provided that high convective volumes are achieved.

Objective: This review examines the mechanisms underlying OHDF’s clinical and benefits and how they contribute to improve patient outcomes.

Key Findings: OHDF improves vascular and cardiac health by stabilizing hemodynamics, reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, and enhancing middle- and large-molecular-weight toxin removal. Additional benefits include better anemia management, improved nutritional status, and enhanced quality of life.

Future Directions: Research should explore patient-centered kidney care, effects on subgroup of patients such as diabetic, cardiac or elderly, and its potential role in incremental and intensive dialysis.

Conclusion: OHDF is a superior dialysis modality that improves survival and patient outcomes, primarily by improving vascular and cardiac health. These benefits underscore the need for broader adoption and patient-centered optimization of OHDF.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

Kidney replacement therapy, Dialysis patient outcome, Cardiovascular burden, Athero-sclerosis, Uremic toxicity

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  • Canaud B, Köhler K, Sichart JM, Möller S. Global prevalent use, trends and practices in haemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35(3):398-407.
  • Maduell F, Broseta JJ, Gómez M, Racionero P, Montagud-Marrahi E, Rodas L, et al. Determining factors for hemodiafiltration to equal or exceed the performance of expanded hemodialysis. Artif Organs. 2020;44(10):E448-e58
  • Maduell F, Broseta JJ, Rodas L, Montagud-Marrahi E, Rodriguez-Espinosa D, Hermida E, et al. Comparison of Solute Removal Properties Between High-Efficient Dialysis Modalities in Low Blood Flow Rate. Ther Apher Dial. 2020;24(4):387-92.
  • Maduell F, Rodas L, Broseta JJ, Gomez M, Xipell M, Guillen E, et al. Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer versus Eight Hemodiafiltration Dialyzers: Comparison Using a Global Removal Score. Blood Purif. 2019;48(2):167-74.
  • Ronco C, Marchionna N, Brendolan A, Neri M, Lorenzin A, Martínez Rueda AJ. Expanded haemodialysis: from operational mechanism to clinical results. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33(suppl_3):iii41-iii7.
  • Lorenzin A, Neri M, Lupi A, Todesco M, Santimaria M, Alghisi A, et al. Quantification of Internal Filtration in Hollow Fiber Hemodialyzers with Medium Cut-Off Membrane. Blood Purif. 2018;46(3):196-204.
  • Lang T, Zawada AM, Theis L, Braun J, Ottillinger B, Kopperschmidt P, et al. Hemodiafiltration: Technical and Medical Insights. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023;10(2).
  • Canaud B, Blankestijn PJ, Grooteman MPC, Davenport A. Why and how high volume hemodiafiltration may reduce cardiovascular mortality in stage 5 chronic kidney disease dialysis patients? A comprehensive literature review on mechanisms involved. Semin Dial. 2022;35 (2):117-28.
  • Blankestijn PJ, Vernooij RWM, Hockham C, Strippoli GFM, Canaud B, Hegbrant J, et al. Effect of Hemodiafiltration or Hemodialysis on Mortality in Kidney Failure. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(8):700-9.
  • Vernooij RWM, Hockham C, Strippoli G, Green S, Hegbrant J, Davenport A, et al. Haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis for kidney failure: an individual patient data meta-analy-sis of randomised controlled trials. 2024.
  • Zhang Y, Winter A, Ferreras BA, Carioni P, Arkossy O, Anger M, et al. Real-world effectiveness of hemodialysis modalities: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2025;26(1):9.
  • da Rocha EP, Kojima CA, Modelli de Andrade LG, Costa DM, Magalhaes AO, Rocha WF, et al. Comparing Survival Outcomes between Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration Using Real-World Data from Brazil. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2).
  • Strippoli GFM, Green SC. Actioning the findings of hard endpoint clinical trials as they emerge in the realm of chronic kidney disease care: a review and a call to action. Clin Kidney J. 2024;17(2):sfae035.
  • Locatelli F, Altieri P, Andrulli S, Bolasco P, Sau G, Pedrini LA, et al. Hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration reduce intradialytic hypotension in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(10): 1798-807.
  • Morena M, Jaussent A, Chalabi L, Leray-Moragues H, Chenine L, Debure A, et al. Treatment tolerance and patient-reported outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration compared to high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly. Kidney Int. 2017;91(6):1495-509.
  • Rootjes PA, Chaara S, de Roij van Zuijdewijn CLM, Nubé MJ, Wijngaarden G, Grooteman MPC. High-Volume Hemodiafiltration and Cool Hemodialysis Have a Beneficial Effect on Intradialytic Hemodynamics: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Four Intermittent Dialysis Strategies. Kidney Int Rep. 2022;7(9):1980-90.
  • Liu P, Rootjes PA, de Roij van Zuijdewijn CLM, Hau CM, Nubé MJ, Nieuwland R, et al. Intradialytic cardiovascular injury is lowest in high-volume haemodiafiltration: a randomized cross-over trial in four intermittent dialysis strategies. Clin Kidney J. 2024;17(6):sfae134.
  • Karamperis N, Jensen D, Sloth E, Jensen JD. Comparison of predilution hemodiafiltration and low-flux hemodialysis at temperature-controlled conditions using high calcium-ion concentration in the replacement and dialysis fluid. Clin Nephrol. 2007;67(4):230-9.