ROBOT AUTONOMY AND POST-LABOR UTOPIA

Humanology 2 (2025)  [135–154]

 

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Miloš Agatonović

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/HumanologyI-2.135A

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

This paper begins with John Perry’s thesis that self-location is essential for action, aiming to demonstrate that artificial systems can achieve autonomy, even though they lack consciousness, as long as they are capable of self-location. The argument draws on Jenann Ismael’s view that intelligence, as a function of a system’s internal structure representing the world, does not merely mirror reality but creates links between the system’s internal elements and external space, guiding the body’s movement in the correct direction. The notions of intelligence and autonomy in robots are not far-fetched but rather concepts that can be thoroughly developed and realized by constructing information systems capable of solving practical problems independently and acting autonomously. As a result, we can expect autonomous machines to become part of everyday life in the future. Philosopher Nick Bostrom, in his book Deep Utopia: Life and Meaning in a Solved World (2024), explores post-work utopias, envisioning societies that have fully automated, thereby eliminating the need for work. Bostrom’s thought experiment of a “solved world” – where all life’s problems are resolved, and technological advancement has removed the need for human work, giving people the freedom to shape their lives – overlooks the idea that work is integral to how humans create meaning and values. A future where autonomous machines are commonplace raises new questions and challenges, as work plays a crucial role in human self-determination. There is a risk that a world dominated by intelligent and autonomous machines could lead to humans becoming enslaved by their own ideas, both in terms of values and scientific-technological constructs.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

robot autonomy, self-location, post-labor utopia, solved world, labor

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  1. Agatonović, М. (2024). Da li je moguća prava autonomija robota? (filozofsko razmatranje). Napredak, 5(2), 109–118.
  2. Agatonović, M. (2017). Ničeova etika i kritika morala (doktorska disertacija). Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet.
  3. Agatonović, M. (2018). The Case of Transhumanism: The Possibility of Application of Nietzsche’s Ethics and Critique of Morality Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 29(3), 429–439.
  4. Agatonović, M. (2023). The Fiction of Simulation: A Critique of Bostrom’s Simulation AI & Society, 38(4): 1579–1586. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01312-y
  5. Agatonović, M. (2024). Nietzsche contra Transhumanism. Nišavić, I., Mitranić Marinković, N., Krstić, P. (eds). Posthumanism and Education: Transgression or Interdependence. London: Transnational Press.
  6. Bostrom, N. (2024). Deep Utopia: Life and Meaning in a Solved World. Washington, DC: IdeaPress Publishing.
  7. Durrant-Whyte, H., Bailey, T. (2006). Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Part I. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 13(2), 99–110.
  8. Ismael, J. T. (2007). The Situated Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Marks, K. (1972). Ekonomsko-filozofski rukopisi iz 1844. godine. K. Marks, F. Engels, Dela (Treći tom). Beograd: Prosveta.
  10. Marks, K. (1977). Najamni rad i kapital. Marks, F. Engels, Dela (Deveti tom). Beograd: Prosveta.
  11. Marks, K, Engels, F. (1974). Nemačaka ideologija. K. Marks, F. Engels, Dela (Šesti tom). Beograd: Prosveta.
  12. Musto, M. (ed.) (2021). Karl Marx’s Writings on Alienation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Niče, F. (1994). Sa one strane dobra i zla/Genealogija morala. Beograd: Prosveta.
  14. Nietzsche, F. (1999). Sämtliche Werke, Kritische Studienausgabe (vol. 4). München/Berlin/New York: de
  15. Perry, J. (1979). The Problem of the Essential Indexical. Noûs, 13, 3–21.
  16. Standing, G. (2020). Battling Eight Giants: Basic Income Now. London & New York: I.B. Tauris.
  17. Šopenhauer, A. (2005). Svet kao volja i predstava (prvi tom). Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
  18. Teller, P. (2011). Robots, Action, and the “Essential Indexical”. Phenomenological Research, 82(3), 763–771.