Evaluation of genotoxic potential of ethyl methanesulfonate in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in silico and in vitro

3rd International Conference on Chemo and BioInformatics, Kragujevac, September 25-26. 2025. (pp. 280-283) 

 

АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Marijana D. Janić, Mila N. Kostić, Ksenija M. Radošević, Ana P. Valenta Šobot, Jelena G. Filipović Tričković, Tatjana G. Momić

 

Download Full Pdf   

DOI:  10.46793/ICCBIKG25.280J

САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:

It was observed that ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) shows DNA alkylating capabilities. The aim of this study was to validate the in silico prediction of EMS genotoxicity obtained by the VEGA-QSAR platform with the micronuclei frequency and proliferation potential from in vitro testing on human PHA-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Mitogen- stimulated PBMCs were a model system for EMS genotoxicity testing in cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay. The observed in vitro results had the highest agreements with both in silico IRFMN-VERMEER 1.0.1 and IRFMN 1.0.2 prediction models.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:

Ethyl methanesulfonate, in silico, genotoxicity, micronucleus, mononuclear cells

ПРОЈЕКАТ / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

This research is funded by the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation, Republic of Serbia, Grant: No. 451-03- 136/2025-03/ 200017.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:

  • E. Gocke, H. Bürgin, L. Müller, T. Pfister, Literature review on the genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity of ethyl methanesulfonate, Toxicology Letters, 190 (2009) 254-265.
  • H. Stopper, W.K. Lutz, Induction of micronuclei in human cell lines and primary cells by combination treatment with gamma-radiation and ethyl methanesulfonate, Mutagenesis, 17 (2002) 177- 181.
  • J. Sanders, Anthonissen, R., Johnson G.E, Vanhaecke T., Mertens B., A benchmark concentration- based strategy for evaluating the combined effects of genotoxic compounds in TK6 cells, Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity, 99 (2025) 1581-1589.
  • M. Fenech, The in vitro micronucleus technique, Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 455 (2000) 81-95.
  • M. Fenech, A.A. Morley, Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes, Mutation Research/Environmental Mutagenesis and Related Subjects, 147 (1985) 29-36.
  • M. Van Bossuyt, G. Raitano, M. Honma, E. Van Hoeck, T. Vanhaecke, V. Rogiers, B. Mertens, Benfenati, New QSAR models to predict chromosome damaging potential based on the in vivo micronucleus test, Toxicology Letters, 329 (2020) 80-84.
  • T. Srisongkram, Ensemble Quantitative Read-Across Structure–Activity Relationship Algorithm for Predicting Skin Cytotoxicity, Chemical Research in Toxicology, 36 (2023) 1961-1972.
  • P. Pradeep, R. Judson, D.M. Demarini, N. Keshava, T.M. Martin, J. Dean, C.F. Gibbons, A. Simha, S.H. Warren, M.R. Gwinn, G. Patlewicz, An evaluation of existing QSAR models and structural alerts and development of new ensemble models for genotoxicity using a newly compiled experimental dataset, Computational Toxicology, 18 (2021) 100167.
  • VEGA HUB, https://www.vegahub.eu/, 06.2025.
  • M. Fenech, W.P. Chang, M. Kirsch-Volders, N. Holland, S. Bonassi, E. Zeiger, HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 534 (2003) 65-75.
  • D. Baderna, D. Gadaleta, E. Lostaglio, G. Selvestrel, G. Raitano, A. Golbamaki, A. Lombardo, Benfenati, New in silico models to predict in vitro micronucleus induction as marker of genotoxicity, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 385 (2020) 121638.
  • T. Ferrari, D. Cattaneo, G. Gini, N. Golbamaki Bakhtyari, A. Manganaro, E. Benfenati, Automatic knowledge extraction from chemical structures: the case of mutagenicity prediction, SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 24 (2013) 365-383.