Stavovi studenata neohelenistike o primeni IKT alata u razvijanju fonološke kompetencije

Uzdanica XVIII 2 (2021), (str. 329-342)

AUTOR(I): Antonina V. Kostić, Vojkan B. Stojičić

E-ADRESA: antonina.irini@gmail.com

Download Full Pdf 

DOI: 10.46793/Uzdanica18.II.329K

SAŽETAK:

Rad predstavlja pokušaj da se sagleda na koji način upotreba savremenih IKT2 alata može doprineti razvijanju fonološke kompetencije kod studenata modernog grčkog jezika. Učenje novog fonološkog sistema u stranom jeziku predstavlja veliki izazov. Poslednjih godina interesovanje za ovu oblast ponovo je u fokusu, a fo- nološka percepcija i produkcija posmatraju se iz različitih perspektiva. Cilj ovog rada je da predstavi novi pogled na razvijanje fonološke kompetencije u modernom grč- kom jeziku kod srbofonih govornika, iz perspektive izazova i mogućnosti koje pruža učenje na daljinu. Takođe, u radu se analiziraju stavovi studenata prve i druge godine neohelenistike u vezi sa usvajanjem fonološke kompetencije kroz prizmu upotrebe savremenih multimedijalnih tehnologija u nastavi modernog grčkog jezika kao stranog. Dodatno, kako bi se na adekvatan način usvojile fonološke karakteristike modernog grčkog jezika, u radu se ukazuje na alternativni pristup u kreiranju različitih tipova vežbi u pisanom i usmenom obliku. Analiza rezultata ankete s jedne strane ukazuje na to da su studenti neohelenistike svesni da i fonološka kompetencija ima važnu ulogu u učenju stranog jezika, dok sa druge strane ukazuje na to da studenti prepoznaju i pozitivno reaguju na dodatne didaktičke materijale. Takođe, ističe se značaj dodatne motivacije kojoj doprinose predavači, kao i uloga strategija učenja i korišćenja dodatnih alata u ovom procesu.

KLJUČNE REČI:

stavovi o fonološkoj kompetenciji, moderni grčki kao strani jezik, srbofoni govornici, onlajn-nastava, Mudl (Moodle).

LITERATURA:

  • Baril (1985): C. Burrill, The Sensitive Period Hypothesis: A Review of Literature Regarding Acquisition of a Native-Like Pronunciation in a Second Language, preuzeto mar- ta 2021. sa https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED265745.
  • Bejli, Li (2020): D. Bailey, A. Lee, Learning from experience in the midst of covid-19: Benefits, challenges, and strategies in online teaching, Computer-Assisted Lan- guage Learning Electronic Journal, 21(2), 178–198.
  • Braun (2000): C. Brown, The interrelation between speech perception and phono- logical acquisition from infant to adult, Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, 1, 4–64.
  • Durbaba (2011): O. Durbaba, Teorija i praksa učenja i nastave stranih jezika, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike.
  • Jerotijević Tišma (2017): D. Jerotijević Tišma, Percepcija i produkcija konsonantskog sistema u englesko-srpskoj međujezičkoj fonologiji, doktorska diser- tacija, Kragujevac: Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, preuzeto marta 2021. sa https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/bitstream/id/50882/Disertacija.pdf.
  • Kesada Vaskez (2019): L. Quesada Vázquez, The Introduction of Rhythm Instruction in the English as a Foreign Language Classroom to Improve the Comprehensibility and Fluency of English for Specific Purposes Students, doctoral dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, preuzeto decembra 2021. sa https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/668385/TESI.pdf?sequence=1
  • Kizi, Anatolevna (2020): O. Qizi, Y. Anatolevna, The Role of Phonetics in Lan- guages Teaching, Science and Education, 1(2), 495–500.
  • Krašen (1982): S. Krashen, Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition, Pergamon: FairviewPark.
  • Lambropulu, Stojičić (2021): Μ. Λαμπροπούλου, Β. Στόιτσιτς, <δ> ή <ντ>; <θ> ή <τ>; <γ> ή <γκ>; Συστηματικά λάθη κατά την εκμάθηση του ορθογραφικού συστήματος της ελληνικής γλώσσας από σερβόφωνους φοιτητές, In: Th. Markopoulos, Ch. Vlachos, Α. Archakis, D. Papazahariou, G. Xydopoulos, Α. Roussou (Eds.), Proceed- ings of the ICGL14, Patras: University of Patras, 671–683.
  • Levis, Mojer (2014): J. Levis, A. Moyer, Future directions in the research and teaching of L2 pronunciation, In: J. Levis, A. Moyer (Eds.), Social dynamics of second language accent, Boston, MA: DeGruyter Mouton, 275–291.
  • Majkan, Kokorada (2021): M. Maican, E. Cocoradă, Online foreign language learning in higher education and its correlates during the COVID-19 pandemic, Sustain- ability, 13(2), 1–21, preuzeto marta 2021. sa https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020781.
  • Nurhajati (2019): D. Nurhayati, Students’ Perspective on Innovative Teaching Model Using Edmodo in Teaching English Phonology: A Virtual Class Development, Di- namika Ilmu, 19(1), 13–35.
  • Nufild (1980): G. Neufeld, On the adults’ ability to acquire phonology, TESOL Quarterly, 14, 285–298.
  • Pazila, Hašim, Junus (2019): F. Pazilah, H. Hashim, M. Yunus, Using technol- ogy in ESL classroom: highlights and challenges, Creative Education, 10(12), 3205–3212.
  • Revitijadu, Tzakosta (2007): A. Ρεβυθιάδου, M. Τζακώστα, Η φωνολογία στη διδασκαλία της ελληνικής ως ξένης γλώσσας, Αθήνα: Εκδόσεις Πατάκη.
  • Ritonga, Kustati, Budiarti, Lahmi, Asmara, Kurnjiavan, Jenti (2021): M. Ri- tonga, M. Kustati, M. Budiarti, A. Lahmi, M. Asmara, R. Kurniawan, E. Yenti, Arabic as foreign language learning in pandemic COVID-19 as perceived by students and teachers, Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 75–92.
  • Ričards, Rodžers (1986): J. C. Richards, T. S. Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: a description and analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Savil-Trojk, Barto (2016): M. Saville-Troike, K. Barto, Introducing second lan-
  • guage acquisition, Cambridge: CUP.
  • Simin, Hejdari (2013): S. Simin, A. Heidari, Computer-Based Assessment: Pros and Cons, Elixir International Journal, 55, 12732–12734.
  • Snou, Hofnagel-Hol (1977): C. Snow, M. Hoefnagel-Hohle, Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds, Language and Speech, 20, 357–365.
  • Stojičić (2016): V. Stojičić, Receptivne jezičke aktivnosti u univerzi- tetskoj nastavi stranog jezika – relacije između modernog grčkog i srpskog jezi- ka, doktorska disertacija, Beograd: Filološki fakultet, preuzeto marta 2021. sa https://harvester.rcub.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4826.
  • Taron (1978): E. Tarone, The phonology of interlanguage, In: J. C. Richards (Ed.), Understanding Second and Foreign Language Learning, Rowley, Mass: Newbury House, 15–33.
  • Trofimovič, Gatbonton (2006): P. Trofimovich, E. Gatbonton, Repetition and focus on form in processing L2 Spanish words: Implications for pronunciation instruction, The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 519–535.
  • Halim, Hašim (2019): M. Halim, H. Hashim, Integrating web 2.0 technology in ESL classroom: A review on the benefits and barriers, Journal of Counseling and Educa- tional Technology, 2(2), 1–8.
  • Humel i Frenč (2010): K. Hummel, L. French, Phonological memory and im- plications for the second language classroom, Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(3), 371–391.
  • Ciarcioni (2011): E. Tsiartsioni, Can pronunciation be taught? Teaching English speech rhythm to Greek students, Selected papers on theoretical and applied linguistics, 19, 447–458.
  • Džouns (1997): R. Jones, Beyond “listen and repeat”: Pronunciation teaching materi- als and theories of second language acquisition, System, 25(1), 103–112.
  • Šamli, Fil (2012): S. Shyamlee, M. Phil, Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis, International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture, 33, 150–156.