UPOTREBA REČNIKÂ U UČENJU ENGLESKOG JEZIKA STRUKE NA TERCIJARNOM NIVOU IZ PERSPEKTIVE STUDENATA

Nasleđe 49 (2021), str. 107-121

AUTOR(I): Tatjana LJ. Glušac, Mira M. Milić

E-ADRESA: tatjana.glusac@gmail.com, miramilicns@gmail.com

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/NasKg2149.107G

SAŽETAK:

Cilj ovog rada je da prikaže deo rezultata istraživanja koje se bavilo ispitivanjem upotrebe opštih i stručnih rečnika u učenju engleskog jezika struke na našim visokoškolskim institucijama. Istraživanje je sprovedeno na uzorku od 705 studenata Univerziteta u Novom Sadu, a za njegove potrebe konstruisan je upitnik koji se sastojao od 50 pitanja sa četvorostepenom skalom ponuđenih odgovora i 10 pitanja sa ponuđena dva odgovora (slažem se i ne slažem se). Takođe, sproveden je i polustrukturisani intervju sa 11 ispitanika. Podaci dobijeni putem upitnika obrađeni su pomoću statističkog paketa SPSS 20, a podaci iz intervjua obrađeni su postupkom analize sadržaja. Kvantitativni rezultati ukazuju na to da većina ispitanika najčešće koristi digitalne rečnike, ređe štampane i jednojezične, a najređe stručne. Isti, kvantitativni rezultati pokazuju da studenti najviše  konsultuju rečnik radi nalaženja značenja  reči i provere pravopisa, da ne razumeju skraćenice za gramatička obeležja odrednica i ne umeju da procene valjanost rečnikâ. Takođe, većina ih ne poseduje stručni rečnik. Kvalitativni rezultati potvrđuju da ispitanici uglavnom koriste digitalne rečnike i besplatne servise za prevođenje na internetu (npr. Google translate), jer je pretraživanje pomoću njih mnogo brže, a cilj njihove pretrage je gotovo isključivo značenje reči. Dobijeni rezultati jasno ukazuju na neophodnost sistematske obuke učenikâ stranog jezika u vezi sa upotrebom rečnikâ na svim nivoima obrazovanja.

KLJUČNE REČI:

engleski jezik struke, tercijarno obrazovanje, opšti rečnici, stručni rečnici

LITERATURA:

  • Akbari 2015: Z. Akbari. Key vocabulary learning strategies in ESP and EGP course books. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(1), 1–7. DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.1.
  • Asgari, Gazali 2011: A. Asgari, M. Ghazali. The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in Universiti Putra Malaysia. English Language Teach- ing, 4(2), 84–90.
  • Ašer 1999: C. Asher. Using dictionaries in the GCSE examination of modern foreign languages: Teachers’ views and learners’ performance. Studies in Modern Language Education, 7(1), 59–67.
  • Bekster 1980: J. Baxter. The dictionary and vocabulary behavior: A single word or a handful? TESOL Quarterly, 14(3), 325–336.
  • Kateli 2009: Y-M. Catelly. Using the WordWeb online dictionary in an ESP class. ANALELE UNIVER- SITĂłII “DUNĂREA DE JOS” DIN GALAłI FASCIC- ULA XXIV ANUL, II 1(2), 501–507.
  • Čejmbrz 1999: G. Chambers. Using dictionaries in the GCSE examination of modern foreign languages: Pupils’ perceptions. Studies in Modern Language Educa- tion, 7(1), 68–85.
  • Čan 2004: Y. V. Chun. EFL learners’ use of print and online dictionaries in L1 and L2 writing processes. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 7 (1), 9–35.
  • Džiapa 2001: E. Dziapa. The relative effectiveness of vocabulary acquisition through reading by Polish learners of English using two types of dictionaries: Monolin- gual and bilingual. (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.
  • Elis 2003: N. Ellis. Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: the emergence of second language structure, in: C. Doughty and M. H. Long (Eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, 33–68.
  • Harvi, Jul 1997: K. Harvey, D. Yuill. A study of the use of a monolingual pedagogi- cal dictionary by learners of English engaged in writing. Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 253–278.
  • Hajati, Fatazade 2006: M. Hayati, A. Fattahzadeh. The effect of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries on vocabulary recall and retention of EFL learners. The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 125–134.
  • Krečka 2007: J. Krajka. Online lexicological tools in ESP – towards an approach to strategy training. Scripta Manent, 3(1), 3–19.
  • Lofer, Hadar 1997: B. Laufer, L. Hadar. Assessing the effectiveness of monolingual, bilingual, and “bilingualised” dictionaries in the comprehension and pro- duction of new words. The Modern Language Journal, 81(2), 189–196.
  • Lofer, Kimel 1997: B. Laufer, M. Kimmel. Bilingualised dictionaries: how learners really use them. System, 25(3), 361–369.
  • Lofer, Melamed 1994: B. Laufer, L. Melamed. Monolingual, bilingual and ‘bilingual- ised’ dictionaries: Which are more effective, for what and for whom? in: W. Martin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings from EURALEX 1994. Amsterdam, Nether- lands, Vrije Universiteit, 565–576.
  • Lin i sar. 2017: D. T. A. Lin, A. Pandian, P. Jaganathan. Facilitating learner autonomy: reading and effective dictionary use for lexical development. The Reading Matrix, 17(2), 40–51.
  • Lu 2004: R. Lew. Which dictionary for whom Receptive use of bilingual, monolingual and semi-bilingual dictionaries by Polish learners of English. Poznan, PL: Motivex.
  • Lu 2011: R. Lew. Studies in dictionary use: recent developments. International Journal of Lexicography, 24(1), 1-4. DOI: 10.1093/ijl/ecq044.
  • Lu 2013: R. Lew. Online dictionary skills, in: I. J. Kosem et al. (Eds.), Electronic Lex- icography in the 21st Century: Thinking Outside the Paper. Proceedings of the eLex 2013 Conference, Tallinn, Estonia, 16–31.
  • Milić 2015: M. Milić. Creating English-based Sports Terms in Serbian: Theoretical and Practical Aspects. Terminology 21(1), 1–22.
  • Milić 2016: M. Milić. An English-Serbian dictionary of sports terms as an aid in teaching standardization of English-based sports  terminology  in  Serbian, in: B. Eraković, M. Todorova (Eds.). English Studies Today: Prospects and Perspectives. Selected Papers from the Third International Conference English Language and Anglophone Literatures Today (ELALT 3), 369–381. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.
  • Milić i sar. 2018: M. Milić, T. Glušac, A. Kardoš. The effectiveness of dictionary-aided teaching standardization of English-based sports terms in Serbian. Lexikos, 28, 1–25.
  • Nejšon 2003: I. S. P. Nation. The role of the first language in foreign language learn- ing. Asian EFL Journal (Online). Dostupno na https://www.victoria.ac.nz/ lals/about/staff/publications/paul-nation/2003-Role-of-L1-Asian-EFL.pdf
  • Pjotrovski 1989: T. Piotrowski. Monolingual and bilingual dictionaries: fundamen- tal differences, in: M. Tickoo (Ed.), Learners’ Dictionaries: State of the Art, 72–83. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
  • Prćić 2013: T. Prćić. Englesko-srpska kontaktnojezička kompetencija: od prakse preko teorije do prakse, u: S. Gudurić i M. Stefanović (ur.),  Jezici i kulture  u vremenu i prostoru II/2. Tematski zbornik. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet, 183–195.
  • Prćić 2014: T.  Prćić.  Building  contact  linguistic  competence  related  to  English as the nativized foreign language. System 42, 143-154. DOI: 10.1016/j. system.2013.11.007.
  • Prćić 2018: T. Prćić. Ka savremenim srpskim rečnicima, prvo, elektronsko, izdanje. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet. Dostupno na http://digitalna.ff.uns.ac.rs/ sadrzaj/2018/978-86-6065-454-2.
  • Prćić 2019: T. Prćić. Engleski u srpskom, treće, elektronsko izdanje. Novi Sad: Filozof- ski fakultet.
  • Sedaj, Šokrpur 2012: F. Seddigh, N. Shokrpur. Vocabulary learning strategies of medical students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 160–173.
  • Stanojević Gocić 2016: M. Stanojević Gocić. Strategije čitanja koje se koriste u cilju razumevanja teksta u nastavi engleskog jezika struke. Nasleđe, 35, 137–150.
  • Teng 1997: G. M. Tang. Pocket electronic dictionaries for second language learning: Helping or hindrance? TESL Canada Journal, 15(1), 39–57.
  • Tompson 1987: G. Thompson. Using bilingual dictionaries. ELT Journal, 41(4), 282–286.
  • Tam 2004: J. Thumb. Dictionary Look-up Strategies and the Bilingualised Learner’s Dictionary: A Think-aloud Study. Tubingen, DE: Max Niemeyer.
  • Čia 2007: L. H. Xia. Strategies of English Vocabulary Learning. China: Hospital Department of Foreign Languages Institute, Jiujiang University.
  • Jamaizumi 2014: M. Yamaizumi. Teaching English–Japanese dictionary use in uni- versity remedial courses. Komaba Journal of English Education, 5, 1–28.
  • Jorio 1971: C. A. Yorio. Some sources of reading problems for foreign language learn- ers. Language Learning, 21(1), 107–115.