PHILIP K. DICK’S UBIK: A NATURAL POSSIBLE WORLD OF SCIENCE FICTION OR A SUPERNATURAL POSSIBLE WORLD OF FANTASY?

Липар 82 (2023) (стр. 107-121)

АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Mirko Ž. Šešlak

Е-АДРЕСА / E-MAIL: mirkosslk@yahoo.com

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/LIPAR82.107S

САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:

The article aims to explore whether the text of Philip K. Dick’s Ubik constructs a natural (physi- cally possible) or a supernatural (physically impossible) fictional world. According to Darko Suvin, one of the fundamental traits of science fiction is that its texts construct natural, physically possible fictional worlds. Readers of science fiction have often complained of Ubik, regarding it a confusing work, riddled with supernatural impurities and a lack of precise explanations. The betrayal of these expectations often casts doubt on whether this novel is science-fictional or a work of fantasy. If we aim to determine whether the fictional world of Ubik belongs to the possible worlds of science fiction, the theoretical framework for such a task can be found in Lubomir Doležel’s possible worlds theory. To do this, we must analyze the alethic constraints of the given fictional world, for those narrative modalities govern the formation of the fic- tional world’s physical laws and determine what is possible, impossible and necessary within its boundaries. If our analysis shows that the alethic constraints present in Ubik are analogous to the physical laws of the real world, we will prove that this fictional world is physically pos- sible and therefore possesses one of the fundamental traits of science fiction, naturalness. If our analysis shows otherwise, the fictional world of Ubik can be relegated to the supernatural, physically impossible worlds of fantasy.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:

Ubik, Suvin, science fiction, Doležel, natural possible worlds, supernatural worlds

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:

  • Barlow 2005: A. Barlow, How Much Does Chaos Scare You?: Politics, Religion, and Philosophy in the Fiction of Philip K. Dick. Brooklyn, NY & lulu.com: Shakespeare’s Sister, Inc. <https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https:// www.google.rs/&httpsredir=1&article=1026&context=ny_pubs> 21.03.2020.
  • Butler 1995: A. M. Butler, Ontology and Ethics in the Writings of Philip K. Dick (unpublished doctoral thesis). The University of Hull: Hull. <https://hydra.hull. ac.uk/assets/hull:3894a/content> 17.02.2020.
  • Dick 2004 [1969]: P. K. Dick, Ubik. London: Gollancz.
  • Doležel 1998: L. Doležel, Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Doležel 2010: L. Doležel, Possible Worlds of Fiction and History: The Postmodern Stage. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Fitting 1975: P. Fitting, “‘Ubik’: The Deconstruction of Bourgeois SF”. Science Fiction Studies, 2(1), 47–54. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4238910> 11.12.2019.
  • Fitting 1983: P. Fitting, “Reality as Ideological Construct: A Reading of Five Novels by Philip K. Dick (De la réalité comme construction idéologique: lecture de cinq romans de Philip K. Dick)”. Science Fiction Studies, 10(2), 219–236. <http://www. jstor.org/stable/4239550> 27.12.2019.
  • Hayles 1999: N. K. Hayles, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jakovljević 2015: M. Jakovlević, Alternativne stvarnosti Filipa K Dika. Kosovska Mitrovica/Beograd: Filozofski fakultet u Prištini sa privremenim sedištem u Kosovskoj Mitrovici/Makart.
  • Kvas 2020: K. Kvas, The Boundaries of Realism in World Literature (translated to English by Novica Petrović). Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Lexington Books.
  • Lem 1975: S. Lem, “Philip K. Dick: A Visionary among the Charlatans” (translated to English by Robert Abernathy). Science Fiction Studies, 2(1), 54–67. <http://www. jstor.org/stable/4238911> 17.11.2019.
  • Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Entropy. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/entropy> 23.03.2022.
  • Suvin 1975: D. Suvin, “P.K. Dick’s Opus: Artifice as Refuge and World View (Introductory Reflections)”. Science Fiction Studies, 2(1), 8–22. <http://www.jstor. org/stable/4238905> 18.09.2019.
  • Suvin 1979: D. Suvin, Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • Visković 2013: R. D. D. Visković, Philip K. Dick’s Search for Reality: An investigation of Philip K. Dick’s metaphysical questioning, focussing on his 1960s science fiction novels (unpublished doctoral thesis). The University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ. <https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/2292/21010/whole. pdf?sequence=2> 25.06.2021.