THE DYNAMICS OF TRAVELLATORS IN UNDERGROUND SPACE

19th WORLD CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATED RESEARCH CENTRES FOR THE URBAN UNDERGROUND SPACE, Belgrade, Serbia, November 4-7, 2025. (Paper No: 4.5.63,  pp. 697-705)

 

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): John Zacharias

 

Download Full Pdf   

DOI:  10.46793/ACUUS2025.4.5.33

SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:

Travellators, also known as moving walkways, are typically installed to move people quickly and over extended distances in large facilities. They are commonly used in airport terminals and in underground corridors between metro stations, and are generally believed to enable moving larger numbers of people more quickly from point to point than can be achieved without the facility. Utility from the user perspective includes perceived time and kinetic energy savings, while management aims to increase throughput where there is heavy demand. An empirical study is necessary to evaluate how such facilities are actually used and to what extent these utility goals are achieved. Variables in resulting throughput, measured as speed, include 1) standees on the moving travellator, 2) moving pedestrians on the travellator, 3) pedestrians walking on the ground, 4) total pedestrian volume 5) incline of the walking surface. The case study is in the MTR system of Hong Kong, which has several examples of travellators. The heavily used corridors between Central Station and Hong Kong Station provided the test case of four travellators and related open floor areas. Counts were extracted from video capture. The travellator improved efficiency by about 17% during non-saturated flow conditions. Those walking on the travellator walked more slowly than those on firm ground but travelled faster overall because of the travellator motion. The travellator serves to organize the traffic streams, offers an alternate experience of displacement and a place for screen-related activities.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:

travellator, moving walkway, pedestrians, underground network, Hong Kong

PROJEKAT / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • The Lift Consultancy. Consulted 2025-05-10 https://theliftconsultancy.co.uk/how-does-a-travelator-moving-walk-work/
  • Consulted 2025-05-10 https://www.fujitecindia.com/resource/blogs/understanding-travelators-a-comprehensive-guide
  • Hawkins, N.M. & Atha, J. (1976). A study of passenger behaviour on a slow speed travellator system. Ergonomics 19, 4, 499-517.
  • Consulted 2025-05-10 https://dazenelevator.com/what-is-a-travelator/
  • Rastogi, R., Thaniarasu, I. & Chandra, S. (2011). Design implications of walking speed for pedestrian facilities. Journal of Transportation Engineering 137, 10, 687-696. Doi: 10.1061/(ASCI)TE.1943.5436.0000251.
  • Boysen, N., Biskorn, D. & Schwerdfeger, S. (2021). Walk the line: optimizing the layout design of moving walkways. Transportation Science 55, 4, 908-929. https://doi.org/10.1287/trse.2021.1051
  • Zacharias, J. (2013) The Central–Mid-levels Escalator as urban regenerator in Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Design, 18, 4, 559-570.
  • Christensen, C.B. (2023). Congested metro materialities: how platform escalators afford “friction” in the Copenhagen Metro. Applied Mobilities 8, 4, 287-304. Doi: 10.100/23800127.2022.2034098
  • Young, S.B. (1999). Evaluation of pedestrian walking speeds in airport terminals. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1674, 20-26.
  • Kim, K., Hallonquist, L., Settachai, N. & Yamashita, E. (2006). Walking in Waikiki, Hawaii – measuring pedestrian level of service in an urban resort district. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1982, 104-112.
  • Zacharias, J. and Ling, R. (2014). Choosing between stairs and escalator in shopping centers–the impact of location, height and pedestrian volume. Environment & Behavior 47, 6. DOI: 10.1177/0013916513520418
  • Scarinci, R., Markov, I. & Bierlaire, M. (2017). Network design of a transport system based on accelerating moving walkways. Transportation Research Part C 80, 310-328. http://dx/dpo/prg/10.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.016
  • Scarinci, R., Bahrami, F., Ourednik, A. & Bierlaire, M. (2017a). An exploration of moving walkways as a transport system in urban centers. EJTIR 17, 2, 191-206.
  • Burkhardt, J.M., Cahour, B. & Allinc, A (2024). Exploring user experience of transport modes through the multiple dimensions of psychological comfort. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2024, ECCE 2024.
  • Roncoli, C., Chandakas, E. & Kaparias, I. (2023). Estimating on board passenger comfort in public transport vehicles using incomplete automatic passenger counting data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 146, 103963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103963
  • Abenoza, R.F., Cats, O., Susilo, Y.O. (2019) How does travel satisfaction sum up? An exploratory analysis in decomposing the door-to-door experience for multimodal trips. Transportation 46, 1615–1642.
  • Srinivasan, M. (2009). Optimal speeds for walking and running, and walking on a moving walkway. Chaos: An interdisciplinary journal of nonlinear science 026112. https://doiorg/10.1063/1.3141428
  • Mohler, B. J., Thompson, W. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Pick, H. L. Jr., & Warren, W. H. Jr. (2007). Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed. Experimental Brain Research 181, 221.
  • Hawkins, N.M, Atha, J. and Ashford, N. (1974). Behavioural observations of pedestrians boarding a slow speed conveyor. Department of Transport Technology, University of Technology, Loughborough, Report TT7411.