SAME MEASURES, DIFFERENT OUTCOMES: BIOTECHNICAL SOIL AND WATER PROTECTION IN SERBIA AND SELECTED EU COUNTRIES

AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Milica Vranešević , Maja Meseldžija and Radoš Zemunac

 

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/8thMTAgricult.059V

ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:

Soil and water degradation poses increasing threats to agricultural productivity, ecosystem stability, and food security across Europe. Despite growing policy emphasis under the European Green Deal and the EU Soil Strategy for 2030, the effectiveness of protective measures varies substantially across countries and implementation contexts. This study aims to provide a comparative, evidence-based assessment of biotechnical soil and water protection measures in Serbia and selected EU Member States (Hungary, Romania, the Netherlands), explicitly linking policy instruments to field-level implementation and environmental outcomes. A systematic scoping comparative review was conducted, integrating peer-reviewed scientific literature (2018-2025), EU regulatory and policy documents, and outputs from EU-funded research projects (CORDIS database). Identified measures were evaluated using a multi-criteria framework encompassing environmental effectiveness, long-term sustainability, transferability, and economic-operational feasibility across eight quantitative and qualitative indicators. Seven biotechnical measures were systematically evaluated: cover crops, riparian buffer strips, reduced/conservation tillage, biological pest control, controlled drainage systems, constructed wetlands/nature-based retention zones, and precision agriculture. Meta-analytical evidence confirms high effectiveness of cover crops (nitrate leaching reduction: 56–69%), riparian buffer strips (NO₃-N reduction up to 90%), and constructed wetlands (>1,092 kt N removed annually across Europe). Implementation maturity is consistently higher in EU Member States than in Serbia, where adoption remains largely project-driven and institutionally fragmented. No single measure constitutes a universal solution. Effectiveness depends on context-specific packages of complementary practices embedded within coherent policy and institutional frameworks. For Serbia, the primary bottlenecks are institutional fragmentation, insufficient soil monitoring, and limited financial incentives. Shifting from pilot-scale experimentation toward systematic, policy-driven scaling, supported by strengthened advisory services and cross-sectoral coordination, is identified as a priority for achieving resilient soil-water systems.

KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI:

biotechnical measures, soil and water protection, cover crops, riparian buffer strips, controlled drainage, EU agri-environmental policy, Serbia, comparative review

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / PROJEKAT:

The research funds were provided by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation under Contract No. 451-03-34/2026-03/200117 dated 05 February 2026, and by the Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research of AP Vojvodina (Republic of Serbia), as part of the project entitled: Development of new water quality indices for Vojvodina in the context of sustainable agriculture and environmental protection (AQUA-QUAL) (contract no. 003876050 2025 09418 003 000 000 001).

REFERENCES / LITERATURA:

• Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Cheng, K., Yue, Q., Chadwick, D., Espenberg, M., Truu, J., Rees, R.M., & Smith, P. (2019). A critical review of the impacts of cover crops on nitrogen leaching, net greenhouse gas balance and crop productivity. Global Change Biology, 25(8), 2530–2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14644
• Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Panagos, P., Lugato, E., Yang, J. E., Alewell, C., Wuepper, D., Montanarella, L., & Ballabio, C. (2020). Land use and climate change impacts on global soil erosion by water (2015–2070). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(36), 21994–22001. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001403117
• Carstensen, M. V., Hashemi, F., Hoffmann, C. C., Zak, D., Audet, J., & Kronvang, B. (2020). Efficiency of mitigation measures targeting nutrient losses from agricultural drainage systems: A review. Ambio, 49(11), 1820–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01345-5
• European Commission. (2021a). EU Soil Strategy for 2030: Reaping the benefits of healthy soils for people, food, nature and climate (COM/2021/699 final). Publications Office of the European Union.
• European Commission. (2021b). Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the common agricultural policy. Official Journal of the European Union, L 435, 1–186.
• Fohrafellner, J., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., Ravindran Pathma, J., Valkama, E., & Brtnicky, M. (2024). Cover crops affect pool specific soil organic carbon in cropland – A meta-analysis. European Journal of Soil Science, 75(2), e13472. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13472
• Getahun, S. (2024). Application of precision agriculture technologies for sustainable crop production and environmental sustainability: A systematic review. The Scientific World Journal, 2024, Article 2126734. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2126734
• Jian, J., Du, X., Reiter, M. S., & Stewart, R. D. (2020). A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 143, 107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735
• Kumwimba, M. N., Zhu, B., Muyembe, D. K., Dzakpasu, M., Kenney, I. B., & Huang, J. (2024). Nutrient and sediment retention by riparian vegetated buffer strips: Impacts of buffer length, vegetation type, and season. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 366, 108951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.108951
• Lakhiar, I. A., Yan, H., Zhang, C., Wang, G., He, B., Hao, B., & Bhaskar, T. K. (2024). A review of precision irrigation water-saving technology under changing climate for enhancing water use efficiency, crop yield, and environmental footprints. Agriculture, 14(7), 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071141
• Li, Z., Liu, Y., Sun, H., Wang, C., Zhao, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024). A meta-analysis of conservation tillage management effects on soil organic carbon sequestration and soil greenhouse gas flux. Science of the Total Environment, 955, 176927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176927
• Liu, J., Jiang, S., Wang, H., Huffman, R. L., & Jia, Z. (2025). Assessing environmental impacts of agricultural water table management: A global meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 313, 109531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109531
• Montanarella, L., & Panagos, P. (2021). The relevance of sustainable soil management within the European Green Deal. Land Use Policy, 100, 104950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104950
• Nouri, A., Lukas, S., Singh, S., Singh, S., & Machado, S. (2022). When do cover crops reduce nitrate leaching? A global meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 28(15), 4736–4749. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16269
• Olesen, J. E., Trnka, M., Kersebaum, K. C., Skjelvåg, A. O., Seguin, B., Peltonen-Sainio, P., Rossi, F., Kozyra, J., & Micale, F. (2021). Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change. European Journal of Agronomy, 34(3), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.11.003
• Panagos, P., Köninger, J., Ballabio, C., Jones, A., Borrelli, P., Lugato, E., Orgiazzi, A., Almeida Pimentel, J., Libert Amico, A., Roumboutsos, A., Legan, L., & Montanarella, L. (2022). Soil priorities in the European Union. Geoderma Regional, 29, e00510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2022.e00510
• Rova, S., Portela, G., Pinto, R., & Ghermandi, A. (2025). The important role of wetland conservation and restoration in nitrogen removal across European river basins. Nature Water. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00465-0
• Thapa, R., Mirsky, S.B. & Tully, K.L. (2018). Cover Crops Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Agroecosystems:A Global Meta-Analysis. J. Environ. Qual., 47: 1400-1411. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.03.0107
• Valkama, E., Usva, K., Saarinen, M., & Uusitalo, R. (2019). A meta-analysis on nitrogen retention by buffer zones. Journal of Environmental Quality, 48(2), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.03.0120
• WATERAGRI. (2024). Water Retention and Nutrient Recycling in Soils and Streams for Improved Agricultural Production. H2020 Project No. 858375 — Policy Brief No. 01/2024. European Commission, CORDIS.