CONTEMPORARY LAW AND REGULATORY EXPERIMENTS: THE ‘SANDBOX’ AS A MECHANISM TO PROMOTE DIGITALIZATION AND SUSTAINABILITY

XXI Majsko savetovanje (2025) SAVREMENO PRAVO U ERI DIGITALIZACIJE I ODRŽIVOG RAZVOJA (635-653 str.)

AUTOR(I) / AUTHOR(S): Tatjana Jovanić  

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/XXIMajsko.635J

SAŽETAK / ABSTRACT:

Digitization and the growing duty to comply with various sustainability requirements change the face of modern business. In such an environment, the role of the legal norm is not only to introduce specific requirements for products, services, and business models but also to avoid hindering technological innovation, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, precisely to set sustainability standards for business innovations that would prevent their negative effects on the environment and society.

Contemporary regulatory systems include various mechanisms that precede a specific regulatory regime’s formal ‘legalisation’. One of those instruments is the so- called regulatory sandbox. The sandbox represents not a novel legal institution but an innovation in the regulatory process. It is a kind of regulatory conversation within a space where businesses and their interactions are temporarily monitored by the supervisor, who aims to bridge the regulatory gaps and mitigate risks to public interest goals.

This Paper provided a brief review of the regulatory sandbox concept and offered two examples: one referring to digitization in financial services and the other to the importance of this mechanism in achieving sustainable business conduct through the prism of Competition law.

KLJUČNE REČI / KEYWORDS:

Regulatory sandbox, Sustainability, Regulatory experimentation, Competition policy, Financial Innovation

LITERATURA / REFERENCES:

  • Allen, H., RegulatorySandboxes, George Washington Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 3/2019 Arner, D., Barberis, J., Buckley, R. P., Fintech,RegtechandtheReconceptualizationof
  • FinancialRegulation, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, Vol. 37, 2017
  • Baldwin R. et al., Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012
  • Barefoot, J. A..S., DisruptingFintechLaw, Fintech L. Rep, Vol 18, March/April 2015
  • Black, J., Formsand ParadoxesofPrinciplesBased Regulation, LSE Law, Sociology and Economy Working Papers, No. 13/2008
  • Black, J., WhatisRegulatoryInnovation?, in: Black, J. et al. (eds.), Regulatory Innovation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2005
  • Bromberg, L., Godwin, A., Ramsay, I., FintechSandboxes:Achieving a Balance between Regulation and Innovation, Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, Vol. 28, 2017
  • Brownsword, R., Rights,Regulation,andtheTechnologicalRevolution, Oxford, 2009 Buckley, R. P., Arner, D., Veidt, R., Zetzsche, D., BuildingFinTechecosystems: Regulatory
  • sandboxes,innovationhubsand beyond, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, Vol. 61, No. 1/2020
  • Chiu, I. H-Y., ARationalRegulatoryStrategyforGoverningFinancialInnovation, European Journal of Risk Regulation Vol. 8, No. 4/2017
  • Fenwick, M. D., Kaal, W. A., Vermeulen, E. P. M., Regulation Tomorrow: What Happens When Technology Is Faster than the Law?, American University Business Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 3/2017
  • Ford, C., Innovation-FramingRegulation, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 649, No. 1/2013
  • Frieden, R., Ex Ante versus Ex Post Approaches to Network Neutrality: A Comparative Assessment, (2015) 30 Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2/2015
  • Gestel van R., Dijck van G., Better regulation through experimental legislation, European Public Law, Vol. 17, No. 3/2011
  • Hagemann, R., Huddlesston Skees, J., Thierer, A., Soft Law for Hard Problems: The Governance of Emerging Technologies in an Uncertain Future, Colorado Technology Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1/2018
  • Kálmán, J., ExAnteRegulation?TheLegalNatureoftheRegulatorySandboxesorHowto Regulatebefore Regulationeven Exists, in: Hulkó, G.; Vybíral, R. (eds.), European Financial Law in times of crisis of the European Union, Budapest, 2018
  • Knight, B.. Mitchell T.E., The Sandbox Paradox: Balancing the Need to Facilitate Innovation with the Risk of Regulatory Privilege, South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 72, Issue 2, 2020 Omarova, S., Technology v Technocracy: Fintech as a Regulatory Challenge, (2020) 6 Journal of Financial Regulation, Vol. 6, No. 1/2020
  • Philipsen, S., Stamhuis E.H., de Jong, M., Legal enclaves as a test environment for innovative products: Toward legally resilient experimentation policies, Regulation and Governance, Vol 15, No. 4/2021
  • Ranchordás, S., Experimental lawmaking in the EU: Regulatory Sandboxes, University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 12/2021
  • Tsai, C., Lin, C., Liu, H., The Diffusion ofthe SandboxApproachto Disruptive Innovation and ItsLimitations, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 53, No. 3/2020
  • Tsang, C-Y., From Industry Sandbox to Supervisory Control Box: Rethinking the role of regulators in the era of Fintech, Journal of Law, Technology and Policy, 2019
  • Wechsler, M., Perlman, R., Gurung, N., The State of Regulatory Sandboxes in Developing Countries, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018, [https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3285938]
  • Zetzsche, D., Buckley, R. P, Arner D.W., Barberis J.W, Regulating a Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes to Smart Regulation, Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law , Vol. 23, 2017
Legislation
  • European Commission, Commission Notice GuidelinesontheApplicabilityofArticle81of theECTreatytoHorizontalCooperationAgreements (Text with EEA Relevance) (2001) OJ C3
  • European Commission, Communication from the Commission – Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements, C/2023/4752 OJ C 259, 21.7.2023, p. 1–125
  • European Commission, Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel or unresolved questions concerning Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union that arise in individual cases (guidance letters) 2022/C 381/07 C/2022/6925 OJ C 381, 4.10.2022, p. 9–13
Internet
  • American Bar Association – Antitrust Section, SustainabilityandCompetitionLawReportofthe International Developments and Comments Task Force, August 11, 2021, p. 1 [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/652567412548ca0014ddf07a/ABA.pdf], Accessed 10 August 2024
  • Council of the European Union, General Secretariat of the Council, Councilconclusionson regulatory sandboxes and experimentation clauses as tools for an innovation friendly, future-proof and resilient regulatory framework that masters disruptive challenges in the digital age, 2020, p. 14. [https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13026-2020- INIT/en/pdf]
  • European Commission, FactualSummaryoftheContributionsReceivedduringthePublic Consultation onthe Evaluationof theTwoBlockExemptionRegulationsandthe Guidelines on Horizontal Cooperation Agreements, 2019, [https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/ system/files/2021-03/HBERs_consultation_summary.pdf], Accessed 20 August 2024
  • FCA, Default Standards for Sandbox Testing Parameters [https://www.fca.org.uk/ publication/policy/default-standards-for-sandbox-testing-parameters.pdf], Accessed 20 August 2024
  • HCC, Technical Report on Sustainability and Competition, Press Release, 26 January 2021, [https://www.epant.gr/en/enimerosi/press-releases/item/1287-press-release-technical-report- on-sustainability-and-competition.html], Accessed 10 September 2024
  • HCC, DraftStaffDiscussionPaperonSustainabilityIssuesandCompetitionLaw, 2020, [https://www.epant.gr/files/2020/Staff_Discussion_paper.pdf], Accessed 10 August 2024 Iacovides, M.C.; Vrettos, C., FallingThroughtheCracksNoMore?Article102TFEUand
  • SustainabilityITheNexusBetweenDominance,EnvironmentalDegradation,andSocial Injustice, Stockholm Faculty of Law Research Paper Series No. 79, 2020,
  • [https://ssrn.com/abstract=3699416], Accessed 10 August 2024
  • Inderst, R. Sartzetakis, E. Xepapadeas, A., Technical Report on Sustainability and Competition, [https://www.epant.gr/en/enimerosi/publications/research- publications/item/ 1284-technical-report-on-sustainability-and-competition.htm], Accessed 10 August 2024
  • National Academy of Public Administration, Project Management Institute, Agile Regulation: Gateway to the Future – A White Paper by a Study Team of the National Academy of Public
  • Administration and the Project Management Institute, 2021, [https://s3.us-west- 2.amazonaws.com/napa-2021/Agile-Regulation-Gateway-to-the-Future-Report.pdf], Accessed 20 September 2024
  • OECD, Environmental Considerations in Competition Enforcement – Note by Greece, 1 December 2021, DAF/COMP/WD(2021)48 [https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/ WD(2021)48/en/pdf]
  • OECD, Recommendation of the Council for Agile Regulatory Governance to Harness Innovation, 2021, OECD/LEGAL/0464, [https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/ OECD-LEGAL-0464], Accessed 20 September 2024
  • Poncibò, C., Zoboli, L., TheMethodologyofRegulatorySandboxesintheEU:APreliminary AssessmentfromaCompetitionLawPerspective, EU Law Working Papers No. 61/2022, Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, p. 2. [https://law.stanford.edu/ publications/no-61-the-methodology-of-regulatory-sandboxes-in-the-eu-a-preliminary-assessment- from-a-competition-law-perspective/], Accessed 20 August 2024
  • United Nations, The Paris Agreement, 2015 [ https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/paris- agreement], Accessed 20 August 2024