PREGLED MINIPART PROJEKTA: UNAPREĐENJE PARTICIPATIVNOG PLANIRANJA U RUDARSKIM REGIONIMA

Urbanizam i održivi razvoj (2025) [pp. 49-54]

AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Tamara Maričić, dr Marijana Pantić

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/Urbanizam25.049M

ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:

U radu je predstavljen istraživački okvir naučnog projekta MINIPART – Unapređenje učešća javnosti u prostornom planiranju rudarskih regiona, koji finansira Fond za nauku Republike Srbije kroz program PRIZMA (grant #7598). Projekat je usmeren na zajednice koje su ugrožene ekološkim, ekonomskim i društvenim izazovima usled obimne eksploatacije mineralnih sirovina. Rastuće protivljenje građana i nevladinih organizacija rudarskim projektima proizašlo je iz zabrinutosti za negativne uticaje i isključenosti iz procesa odlučivanja, što je dovelo do rastućeg nepoverenja u državne institucije. U realizaciji MINIPART projekta kombinovani su kvalitativni i kvantitativni pristupi kako bi se identifikovale efikasne metode učešća javnosti i prilagodile različitim zainteresovanim stranama. Kroz analizu relevantne literature, međunarodnu studijsku posetu i konsultacije sa građanima i stručnjacima razvija se baza podataka o participativnim metodama. Ove metode se testiraju u Gradu Boru i opštini Majdanpek sprovođenjem anketa, intervjua i organizovanjem fokus grupa.

KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI:

Participativno planiranje; Urbanističko i prostorno planiranje; Metode učešća javnosti; Rudarski regioni; Srbija.

REFERENCES / LITERATURA:

  • Abramowitz, S., & Weinberg, S. L. (2016). Statistics Using IBM SPSS: An Integrative Approach (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Balkan Green Energy News (2019). Fresh protest held in Serbia’s Bor over excessive air pollution. https://balkangreenenergynews.com/fresh-protest-held-in-serbias-bor-over-excessive-air-pollution/. [Accessed: January 12, 2025]
  • Bor030 (2021). Učesnici protesta u Boru dobili prekršajne prijave, kazna 5.000 dinara. bor030.net/ucesnici-protesta-u-boru-dobili-prekrsajne-prijave-kazna-5-000-dinara. [Accessed: January 12, 2025].
  • Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., McEvoy, C. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654.
  • Chauhan, R. (2018). Social justice for miners and mining-affected communities: The present and the future. Obiter, 39(2), 345–362.
  • Conde, M. (2017). Resistance to mining: A review. Ecological Economics, 132, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.025
  • Dubov, A., Shoptaw, S. (2020). The value and ethics of using technology to contain the COVID-19 epidemic (Letter to the Editor). Am. J. Bioeth., 20, W7–W11.
  • Field, A. (2017). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Heffron, R. J., Downes, L., Rodriguez, O. M. R., & McCauley, D. (2021). The emergence of the ‘social licence to operate’ in the extractive industries? Resources Policy, 74, 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.101272
  • Imottesjo, H., Kain, J.-H. (2018). The Urban CoBuilder—A mobile augmented reality tool for crowd-sourced simulation of emergent urban development patterns: Requirements, prototyping and assessment. Comput. Urban Syst., 71, 120–130.
  • Ivanović, S., Tomićević-Dubljević, J., Bjedov, I., Đorđević, I., & Živojinović, I. (2023). Cultural landscape management in context: Local communities’ perceptions under Jadar mineral extraction project in Serbia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 16, 101361.
  • Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3–4), 271–284.
  • Lesser, P. (2021). The road to societal trust: Implementation of Towards Sustainable Mining in Finland and Spain. Mineral Economics, 34(2), 175-186.
  • Manojlovic, B., & Kabanga, E. (2023). Extractivism and conflict: A comparative study of Serbia and the DRC. The Journal of Social Encounters, 7(1), 66–86.
  • Mononen, T., Kivinen, S., Kotilainen, J. M., & Leino, J. (2022). Social and environmental impacts of mining activities in the EU. European Parliament. Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/729156/IPOL_STU(2022)729156_EN.pdf [Accessed: January 12, 2025].
  • Maričić, T. (2014). Socijalni aspekti u prostornom razvoju rudarskih regiona – mogućnost unapređenja na primeru Srbije (doktorska disertacija). Geografski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd.
  • Maričić, T., Cvetinović, M., & Bolay, J. C. (2018). Participatory planning in the urban development of post-socialist Serbia. In T. Marićić, J. C. Bolay, & S. Zeković (Eds.), A support to urban development process (pp. 1–28). EPFL, IAUS.
  • Nikolić, D., Pantić, M., Jokić, V. (2021): Urban and Spatial Planning: Pragmatic Considerations for Plan Implementation Improvements (A Case Study of the City of Bor). SAGE Open Journal January-March 2021, 1–14.
  • N1 Beograd (2020). Massive protest in Bor over pollution. https://rs.n1info.com/english/news/a641477-massive-protest-in-bor-over-pollution/ [Accessed: January 12, 2025].
  • Pantić, M. (2019). Izazovi demografskih promena u planinskim područjima Srbije. IAUS, Beograd.
  • Pantić, M., Cilliers, J., Cimadomo, G., Montaño, F., Olufemi, O., Torres Mallma, S., van den Berg, J. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities for Public Participation in Urban and Regional Planning during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Lessons Learned for the Future. Land10, 1379.
  • Pantić, M., Čolić, N. (2023). Digital Participation Framework for Mountain Areas in Serbia. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences68E, 78-95.
  • Philpot, S. L., Johnson, P. A., Hipel, K. W. (2019). Analysis of a below-water aggregate mining case study in Ontario, Canada using values-centric online citizen participation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(2), 352-368.
  • Proctor, M. R. (2022). A Slow Train Crash That Can Be Avoided: Citizen Power, the Mining of Critical Raw Materials (CRMS) Within Europe and the Need for Investment in Political Realities. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 23(1), 19-28.
  • Radio Slobodna Evropa (2022). Meštani sela kod Bora na istoku Srbije protestuju zbog širenja kineskog rudnika. slobodnaevropa.org/a/bor-protest-kineski-rudnik/31708485.html. [Accessed: January 12, 2025]
  • Rajhans, V., Rege, S., Memon, U., Shinde, A. (2020). Adopting a modified Delphi technique for revisiting the curriculum: A useful approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. Res. J., 20, 373–382.
  • Fond za nauku Republike Srbije, 2025. https://fondzanauku.gov.rs/program-prizma/ [Preuzeto: 23. aprila 2025].
  • Slavković,, Graovac, A., Đokić, J., Radovanović, K. (2021). Javnost na distanci – demokratija u krizi. Analiza planskih procedura u periodu pandemije. CZKD, Beograd.
  • Stepanović, I. (2022). The True Cost of Technology: Double Extractivism and Green Criminology in Serbia. Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law, 60(1), 25-37.
  • Taylor,N., Bryan, C.H., Goodrich, C.G. (2004). Social Assessment: Theory, Process and Techniques. Middleton: Social ecology press.
  • Tsotetsi, O. J. (2022). The effects of strikes on the share returns of gold and platinum mining companies (Master’s thesis). University of Cape Town.
  • Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji, “Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije” br. 72/2009, 81/2009, 64/2010, 24/2011, 121/2012, 42/2013, 50/2013, 98/2013, 132/2014, 145/2014, 83/2018, 31/2019, 37/2019, 9/2020, 52/2021, 62/2023.