BETWEEN THE HUMAN BEING AND THE MACHINE – NEW TENDENCIES IN CRIMINAL LAW

Традиција, кривично и међународно кривично право (2024)  (стр. 303-311)

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Fabio Roberto D’Avila

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/TKMKP24.303A

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

What is the limit of technology and artificial intelligence in the field of criminal law? Would criminal law judged by machines or a criminal science produced by them be acceptable? Part of the cri- ticism directed by the ample use of technology is focused on the objec- tions of the current state of technique or ethical-juridical matters, and not on the machine’s lack of capacity to meet the demands set by criminal law, or even, to meet those demands better than a human being. This essay focuses on this specific matter, seeking to point out the existence of boundaries and limits inherent to the machine, hence, independent to the stage of technology development. It also seeks to demonstrate the absolute indispensability of human beings in the construction and application of knowledge in criminal law.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

artificial intelligence, human being, criminal law

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  • Caetano, M. A., & Oliveira, T. B. de. (2022). Sobre a legitimação de um juiz- robô: um flautista de Hamelin para a justiça? Anais Do I Congresso Nacional Do IEDC, 221–249.
  • Colby, T. B. (2012). In defense of judicial empathy. George Washington University Law School Publications, 96, 1944–2015.
  • Costa, J. de F. (1992). O perigo em direito penal: contributo para a sua fundamentação e compreensão dogmáticas. Coimbra Editora.
  • Costa, J. de F. (2005). Linhas de direito penal e de filosofia. Coimbra Editora. Costa, J. de F. (2017). Direito Penal. Imprensa Nacional.
  • Costa, de F. (2021). Bases para uma concepção onto-antropológica do direito. In B. de Oliveira (Ed.), Filosofia do Direito: Livro Primeiro. Âncora Editora.
  • D’Avila, F. R. (2023). Você habita em mim. Empatia, direito penal e neurociências.  Novos   olhares   e   novos   caminhos.   Revista   Brasileira   de Ciências Criminais, 194(31), 77–95.
  • Decety, J., Echols, S., & Correll, J. (2010). The Blame Game: The Effect of Responsibility and Social Stigma on Empathy for Pain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(5), 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1162/ jocn.2009.21266
  • Feng, C., Li, Z., Feng, X., Wang, L., Tian, T., & Luo, Y.-J. (2015). Social hierar- chy modulates neural responses of empathy for pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(3), 485–495. (https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv135)
  • Frankl, E. (2006). Man’s Search for Meaning (I. Lasch, Trans.; 4th ed., pp.
  • 27–28). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1946)
  • Goethe, J. W. von. (1990). Goethe’s Faust (W. Kaufmann, Trans; p. 95). Anchor Books. (Original work published 1961)
  • Greco, L. (2020). Poder de julgar sem responsabilidade de julgador: a impossibilidade jurídica do juiz-robô (p. 28-39). Marcial Pons.
  • Guo, X., Zheng, L., Zhang, W., Zhu, L., Li, J., Wang, Q., Dienes, Z., & Yang,
  • (2011). Empathic neural responses to others’ pain depend on monetary reward. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(5), 535–541. (https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr034)
  • Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on Thinking (J. M. Anderson & E. H. Freund, Trans.; pp. 45–47). Harper & Row. (Original work published 1959)
  • Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010). Neural Responses to Ingroup and Outgroup Members’ Suffering Predict Individual Differences in Costly Helping. Neuron, 68(1), 149–160. (https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.003)
  • Johnson, J. , Simmons, C. H., Jordav, A., Maclean, L., Taddei, J., Thomas, D., Dovidio, J. F., & Reed, W. (2002). Rodney King and O. J. Revisited: The Impact of Race and Defendant Empathy Induction on Judicial Decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(6), 1208–1223. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01432.x
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow (pp. 52, 145–146). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • (2013, June 24). Feeling Others’ Pain: Transforming Empathy into Compassion – Cognitive Neuroscience Society. Cognitive Neuroscience Society. https://www.cogneurosociety.org/empathy_pain/
  • Moraes, M. Z. de. (2022). Modelo e sistemas penais não violentos: uma teoria ao processo criminal transformativo [Thesis].
  • Moura, de O. (2021). Sobre as bases para uma concepção antropológicas do direito. In J. de F. Costa (Ed.), Filosofia do Direito: Livro Segundo. Âncora Editora.
  • Oliveira, Í.  J.  da  S.  (2019).  Direito,  lógica  e  inteligência  artificial:  por  quê, como e em que medida automatizar a solução judicial de conflitos no Brasil (p. 35) [Thesis].
  • Pancini, L. (2023, June 29).
  • Harvard contrata inteligência artificial como professor em curso de programação. https://exame.com/inteligencia-artificial/harvard-contrata- inteligencia-artificial-como-professor-em-curso-de-programacao/
  • Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014). Empathy and Compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), 875–878.
  • Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith,
  • D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439(7075), 466–469. (https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature04271)
  • Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., & Kaube, H. (2004). Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157–1161. (https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093535)
  • Xu, , Zuo, X., Wang, X., & Han, S. (2009). Do You Feel My Pain? Racial Group Membership Modulates Empathic Neural Responses. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(26), 8525–8529. (https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci. 2418-
  • 2009)