EXPERT BASED TAM–UTAUT–TOE FRAMEWORK FOR AI ADOPTION IN ACCOUNTING: A DELPHI STUDY WITH PRACTITIONERS

Računovodstvena znanja kao činilac ekonomskog i društvenog napretka (2026) [pp. 223-239]  

AUTHOR(S) / AUTOR(I): Todor Tocev ,  Atanasko Atanasovski , Ivan Dionisijev , Bojan Malchev
Download Full Pdf   
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/RZ26.223T
ABSTRACT / SAŽETAK:

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in accounting information systems, audit tools and reporting processes, yet its adoption in professional accounting practice remains uneven and context dependent. This study develops an expert-based framework for AI adoption in accounting by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the Technology–Organisation– Environment (TOE) framework. A two-round Delphi study was conducted with ten experts from Big Four firms, international audit and advisory networks, and an accounting/ERP software company. In the first round, semi-structured interviews were used to validate and refine an initial twelve-factor literature-based framework. In the second round, experts rated the refined factors and items using a five-point Likert scale, while consensus was assessed using median values, interquartile ranges, the percentage of ratings equal to or above four, and the within-group agreement index. The first round expanded the framework into 15 factors, while the second round showed that 13 factors achieved expert consensus. The retained framework confirms the relevance of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and attitude towards AI, while also highlighting organisational support, compatibility, trust, data quality, perceived risk, ethics, privacy and accountability as important adoption conditions.

KEYWORDS / KLJUČNE REČI:

Artificial intelligence, Accounting, Technology adoption, Delphi method

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / PROJEKAT:
REFERENCES / LITERATURA:
  • Al Najjar, M., Ghanem, M. G., Mahboub, R., & Nakhal, B. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in eliminating accounting errors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(8), Article 353.
  • Almgrashi, A., & Mujalli, A. (2025). Sustainable transformation of the accounting and auditing profession: Readiness for blockchain technology adoption through UTAUT and TAM3 frameworks. Sustainability, 17(23), Article 10811.
  • Al-Okaily, M. (2025). Attitudes toward the adoption of accounting analytics technology in the digital transformation landscape. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 21(3), 593-613. 
  • Alshammari, M. M., & Al-Mamary, Y. H. (2025). User acceptance of AI-powered training: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Future Business Journal, 11, Article 239.
  • Anh, N. T. M., Le, T. K. H., Lai, P. T., Duong, A. N., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, T. T., & Vu, N. X. (2024). The effect of technology readiness on adopting artificial intelligence in accounting and auditing in Vietnam. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(1), Article 27.
  • Benzine, W., & Tiar, A. (2022). Evaluation of factors affecting the use of the accounting information system using the TAM model: A field study in Algerian firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 435-459.
  • Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Li, J. Z., Jiang, H., Bajary, A. R., & Ma’aji, M. M. (2025). Does AI adoption redefine financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and information asymmetry? An integrated model of TOE–TAM–RDT and big data governance. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, Article 100572.
  • CPA.com (2025). CPA.com 2025 AI in accounting report. Preuzeto sa: https://www.cpa.com/sites/cpa/files/2025
  • 06/2025_AI_in_Accounting_Report.pdf (10.04.2026).
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  • Dwianto, A., Rahman, A. N., Ulynnuha, O. I., Anam, K., & Saif, G. M. S. (2024). The impact of technology readiness, usefulness, and ease of use on AI-based accounting software adoption. Advances in Accounting Innovation, 1(1), 10-11.
  • Ho, Y. K. (2024). Incorporating digital skills in accounting education. In: Perdana, A. and Wang, T. (eds.), Digital transformation in accounting and auditing (pp.
  • 3-27). Springer. 
  • Hossain, M. Z., Johora, F. T., Raja, M. R., & Hasan, L. (2024). Transformative impact of artificial intelligence and blockchain on the accounting profession. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 2(6), 144-159.
  • Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.
  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98. 
  • Musyaffi, A. M., Johari, R. J., Hendrayati, H., Wolor, C. W., Armeliza, D., Mukhibad, H., & Izwandi, H. S. C. (2025). Exploring technological factors and cloud accounting adoption in MSMEs: A comprehensive TAM framework. International Review of Management and Marketing, 15(1), 283-292.
  • Peng, B., Galley, M., He, P., Cheng, H., Xie, Y., Hu, Y., Huang, Q., Liden, L., Yu, Z., Chen, W., & Gao, J. (2023). Check your facts and try again: Improving large language models with external knowledge and automated feedback. arXiv. Preuzeto sa: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12813 (10.05.2026).
  • Qader, K. S., Jamil, D. A., Sabah, K. K., Anwer, S. A., Mohammad, A. J., Gardi, B., & Abdulrahman, B. S. (2022). The impact of Technological Acceptance Model (TAM) outcome on implementing accounting software. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 6(6), 14-24.
  • Sudaryanto, M. R., Hendrawan, S. A., & Andrian, T. (2023). The effect of technology readiness, digital competence, perceived usefulness, and ease of use on accounting students’ artificial intelligence technology adoption. E3S Web of Conferences, 388, Article 04055.
  • Taib, A., Awang, Y., Shuhidan, S. M., Rashid, N., & Hasan, M. S. (2022). Digitalization in accounting: Technology knowledge and readiness of future accountants. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(1), 348-357.
  • Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
  • Vărzaru, A. A. (2022). Assessing artificial intelligence technology acceptance in managerial accounting. Electronics, 11(14), Article 2256.
  • Vărzaru, A. A., Bocean, C. G., Mangra, M. G., & Simion, D. (2022). Assessing users’ behavior on the adoption of digital technologies in management and accounting information systems. Electronics, 11(21), Article 3613.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. 
  • Wang, M., Zhang, X., & Han, X. (2025). AI driven systems for improving accounting accuracy, fraud detection and financial transparency. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Research, 2(3), 403-421.