DEVELOPMENTS, TRENDS AND PROSPECTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PRACTICES IN THE GREEK GRAPHIC ARTS AND PRINTING INDUSTRY

XXVI MEĐUNARODNI SIMPOZIJUM IZ OBLASTI CELULOZE, PAPIRA, AMBALAŽE I GRAFIKE -CPAG25 (2025) [pp. 91-98]

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Thomais Salogianni, Anastasios Politis

Download Full Pdf

DOI: 10.46793/CPAG25.091S

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

This paper builds upon a previous study that presented the initial findings regarding the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices in the Greek graphic arts and printing industry (Korra, Giotopoulos, & Tsakanikas, 2018). In the context of an evolving global emphasis on sustainable development and responsible entrepreneurship, the current research expands the analysis to examine recent developments and emerging trends shaping CSR engagement within the sector. Particular attention is given to the new strategies being adopted, the shifting expectations of stakeholders, and the multifaceted challenges companies encounter while pursuing sustainability goals (MDPI, 2025).

The analysis is based primarily on secondary data derived from publicly available CSR and sustainability reports. These reports provide a robust foundation for understanding how Greek companies in the sector integrate CSR into their operational models (CSR Hellas, 2025). Key driving forces behind the adoption of CSR practices include stakeholder pressure (e.g., customers, suppliers, regulatory bodies), the strategic aim of enhancing corporate reputation, and the long-term recognition of environmental and economic benefits. At the same time, the study identifies persistent barriers, such as high initial investment costs, limited access to specialized knowledge, and the disconnect between theoretical frameworks and the practical implementation of CSR evaluation tools (Ecopier Solutions, 2023).

The research highlights the most prevalent CSR practices implemented in the industry: use of environmentally friendly materials, waste reduction initiatives, energy efficiency programs, support for local communities, and promotion of fair labor conditions. Moreover, emerging practices in smaller enterprises are examined, where innovative actions such as staff training, social contribution initiatives, and the alignment of CSR with business models are becoming more common (Δημοσθένους, 2018). These practices are shown to significantly contribute to the sustainability and competitiveness of businesses, particularly when supported by strategic planning and effective performance monitoring.

The paper also considers the influence of institutional developments at the European level, such as Directive 2014/95/EU and the more recent Directive 2022/2464/EU on ESG disclosures (MDPI, 2025). These regulations enhance the need for compliance while offering opportunities for strategic differentiation. In addition, the integration of digital monitoring tools for CSR performance enables improved transparency and impact assessment—factors that are increasingly critical for maintaining stakeholder trust and securing long-term value creation.

In conclusion, this contribution to the 26th International symposium in the field of pulp, paper, packaging and graphics aims to present not only the latest empirical insights into CSR implementation in the Greek graphic arts and printing sector but also to propose actionable policy and managerial recommendations. The paper outlines strategic directions for the integration of CSR into corporate identity and governance structures. By embedding CSR within core business strategy and fostering ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, the industry can achieve sustainable growth and strengthen its international positioning.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Graphic Arts, Printing Industry, Sustainability, ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / ПРОЈЕКАТ:

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468 2009.00275.x
CSR Hellas. (2025). Greek Network for Corporate Social Responsibility. https://csrhellas.org/en/
Dimosthenous, E. (2018). The Evolution in Graphic Arts: From Typography and Gutenberg to Augmented Reality and Industrial Printing. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331822058_H_exelixe_stis_Graphikes_Technes_apo_ten_Typogra phia_kai_ton_Goutembergio_sten_epauxemene_pragmatikoteta_sto_entypo_kai_te_biomechanike_ektypose

Directive 2022/2464/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2022). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur –europa.eu
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Ecopier Solutions. (2023). The role of sustainable printing practices in corporate social responsibility. https://www.ecopiersolutions.com/blog/the –role –of –sustainable –printing –practices –in –corporate –social responsibility
Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
European Commission. (2021). Corporate sustainability reporting. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/210421 sustainable –finance –communication_en
European Commission. (2022). Corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD). Retrieved from https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital –markets –union –and –financial –markets/company –reporting –and auditing/company –reporting/corporate –sustainability –reporting_en
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241– 256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551 –006 –9182 –6
Korra, E., Giotopoulos, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2018). CSR Practices and SME Innovativeness in Greece. Entrepreneurship and the Sustainable Development Goals, 8, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040 –724620180000008012
(2025). Compliance with the Requirements of the Greek Legislation for Reporting on ESG Issues: The Case of the Paper Processing Sector. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(1), 14 https://www.mdpi.com/1911 8074/17/1/14
Pedersen, E. R. (2009). Modelling CSR: How managers understand the responsibilities of business towards society. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551 –009 –0078 –0
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92. https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy –and –society –the link –between –competitive –advantage –and –corporate –social –responsibility
Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small businesses and the environment: Turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.628

Spence, L. J. (2007). CSR and small business in a European policy context: The five “C”s of CSR and small business research agenda 2007. Business and Society Review, 112(4), 533–552 https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A7%3A26807831/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id =ebsco%3Agcd%3A27550592&crl=c&link_origin=scholar.google.com