ПОСТУПЦИ УЧИТЕЉА УСМЕРЕНИ НА ПОДСТИЦАЊЕ МОТИВАЦИЈЕ УЧЕНИКА ЗА ЧИТАЊЕ

УМЕТНОСТ ВАСПИТАЊА И ОБРАЗОВАЊА У СВЕТУ КОЈИ СЕ МЕЊА (2025) [pp. 119-138]   

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Јелена Медар Златковић, Наташа Лалић Вучетић, Снежана Мирков

Download Full Pdf 

DOI: 10.46793/ArtEd25.119MZ

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

Проучавање мотивације ученика за читање обухвата различите чиниоце и њихове односе са ангажовањем током читања и са разумевањем прочитаног. На млађем основношколском узрасту развој читалачких компетенција је веома интензиван, а проналажење ефикасних приступа у мотивисању ученика да читају представља изазов за наставнике. У овом раду испитивано је на који начин и којим поступцима учитељи подстичу мотивацију ученика за читање. Извршене су секундарне анализе података добијених путем Упитника за учитеље и Упитника за ученике у истраживању PIRLS 2021 у Србији, на узорку од 226 учитеља и 4037 ученика четвртог разреда основне школе. Поступци учитеља се односе на организовање различитих облика рада и подстицање разговора о прочитаном, разумевања и интерпретације прочитаног. Према добијеним резултатима, настава читања више је усмерена на фронтални и самостални рад ученика, а мање на групни рад. Учитељи најчешће подстичу ученике да дискутују и да продубе разумевање текста, да одговарају на питања и да препричавају прочитано. Мотивација за читање повезана је са ученичким опажањима поступака учитеља. Ученици који су више мотивисани изјављују да су им интересантни садржаји које им учитељи задају да читају. Резултати указују да је потребно примењивати различите облике рада у настави којима се подстичу читалачка интересовања, уживање у читању и веће ангажовање ученика. Тиме се омогућава развијање мотивације, читалачких навика и читалачких компетенција.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

настава, поступци учитеља, ученици основне школе, мотивација за читање, истраживање PIRLS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / ПРОЈЕКАТ:

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  • Almasi, J., & Garas-York, K. (2009). Comprehension and discussion of text. In S. Israel, & G. Dufy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 470–493). Routledge. https://www.academia.edu/37378134/Handbook_of_Research_on_Reading_Comprehension_Dufy_and_Israel_Taylor_Francis_2014_pdf
  • Baroody, A. E., & Diamond, K. E. (2012). Links among home literacy environment, literacy interest, and emergent literacy skills in preschoolers at risk for reading difficulties. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32, 78–87.
  • Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020084
  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934
  • De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., & Vanderlinde, R. (2012). Strategies for promoting autonomous reading motivation: A multiple case study research in elementary education. Frontline Learning Research, 3, 83-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.84
  • Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–533.
  • Gambrell, L. B. (1996). Creating classroom cultures that foster reading motivation. The Reading Teacher, 50, 14–25.
  • Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III; pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42, 237–250. https://10.1080/00461520701621087.
  • Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Engaging adolescents in reading. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi. org/ 10. 4324/ 97802 03887 332.
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children´s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
  • Kanonire, T., Lubenko, J., & Kuzmina, Y. (2022). The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading performance in elementary school. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 36(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1822961
  • Kovačević, Z., Blagdanić, S. i Stojanović, A. (2021). Kooperativno učenje u oblasti upoznavanja i razumevanja sveta i u nastavi prirode i društva. Inovacije u nastavi – časopis za savremenu nastavu, 34(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2101014K
  • Leino, K., Nissinen, K., & Sirén, M. (2022). Associations between teacher quality, instructional quality and student reading outcomes in Nordic PIRLS 2016 data. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 10(1), 25.
  • Lerkkanen, M.-K., Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Viljaranta, J., Poikkeus, A.-M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Siekkinen, M., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2012). The role of teaching practices in the development of children’s interest in reading and mathematics in kindergarten. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 266-279.
  • Lerkkanen, M. K. (2018). The influence of instruction on reading motivation in Finland. In P. Orellana Garcia and P. Baldwin Lind & (Eds.). Reading achievement and motivation in boys and girls: field studies and methodological approaches (pp. 65-78). Literacy Studies, 15. Cham: Springer.
  • Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., Marsh, H. W., & Trautwein, U. (2005). Teacher frame of reference and the big-fish–little-pond effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.002
  • Maksimović, A., & Stančić, M. (2012). Teaching methods from the perspective of teachers. Methodological Horizons, 7(1), 69–82. https://10.32728/mo.07.1.2012.05
  • Martini, F., & Sénéchal, M. (2012). Learning literacy skills at home: Parent teaching, expectations, and child interest. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 44, 210–221.
  • Mirkov, , Lalić-Vučetić, N. i Medar Zlatković, J. (2024). Uloga motivacionih činilaca u razvijanju čitalačke pismenosti učenika. U N. Gutvajn, B., Ranđelović i M., Radulović (ur.), PIRLS 2021 u Srbiji: rezultati međunarodnog istraživanja razvoja čitalačke pismenosti u četvrtom razredu osnovne škole, 127-147. Beograd: institute za pedagoška istraživanja.
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Liu, J. (2021). PIRLS 2021 Context Questionnaire Framework. In Mullis, I. V. S. & Martin, M. O. (Eds.), PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks. Publishers: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
    https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2021/frameworks/
  • Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1822961
  • Niemi, P., Nurmi, J. -E., Lyyra, A. -L., Lerkkanen, M. -K., Lepola, J., Poskiparta, E., & Poikkeus, A. M. (2011). Task avoidance, number skills and parental learning difficulties as predictors of poor response to instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 459–471.
  • Nurmi, J. -E., Viljaranta, J., Tolvanen, A., & Aunola, K. (2012). Teachers adapt their instruction according to students’ academic performance. Educational Psychology, 32, 571–588.Organisation for Economic Cooperation, Development [OECD]. (2010a). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn: Student engagement, strategies and practices (Volume III). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://10.1787/9789264083943-en.
  • O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional “high-stakes” measures of high school students’ science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 161–196. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831206298171
  • Pečjak, S. & Košir, K. (2004). Pupils reading motivation and teachers activities for enhanching it. Review of Psychology, 11(1-2), 11-24.
  • Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., Payne, C., Cox, M. J., & Bradley, R. (2002). The relation of kindergarten classroom environment to teacher, family and school characteristics and child outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 225–238.
  • Radulović, L., i Mitrović, M. (2014). Raznovrsnost nastavnih metoda u našim školama. Nastava i vaspitanje, 63(3), 451-464.
  • Ranđelović, B., Đukić, D., Karalić, E., Čaprić, G.,& Radulović, M.. (2023). PIRLS 2021 – nacionalni izveštaj o rezultatima istraživanja čitalačke pismenosti.Beograd : Zavod za vrednovanje kvaliteta obrazovanja i vaspitanja., 1-161.
    https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_945
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
  • Santa, C. M., Williams, C. K., Ogle, D., Farstrup, A. E., Au, K. H., Baker, B. M., et al. (2000). Excellent reading teachers: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 193–199.
  • Schiefele, U., Stutz, F., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading compre-hension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 49–58.
  • Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). The contribution of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation to the development of reading competence over summer vacation. Reading Psychology, 37(6), 917–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1133465
  • Shin, T., Davison, M. L., Long, J. D., Chan, C. K., & Heistad, D. (2013). Exploring gains in reading and mathematics achievement among regular and exceptional students using growth curve modeling. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.002
  • Silinskas, G., Pakarinen, E., Niemi, P., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2016). The effectiveness of increased support in reading and its relationship to teachers’ affect and children’s motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 45 (53-64). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.025
  • Snowling, M. J., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (2003). Family risk of dyslexia is continuous: Individual differences in the precursors of reading skill. Child Development, 74, 358–373.
  • Sonnenschein, S., Stapleton, L. M., & Benson, A. (2010). The relation between the type and amount of instruction and growth in children’s reading competencies. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 358–389.
  • Sparks, R. L., Patton, J., & Murdoch, A. (2014). Early reading success and its relationship to reading achievement and reading volume: Replication of “10 years later.”. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9439-2
  • Stipek, D., Salmon, J. M., Givvin, K. B., Kazemi, E., Saxe, G., & MacGyvers, V. L. (1998). The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/749862
  • Taboada, A., Tonks, S., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 85–106. https://10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y
  • Torgesen, J. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55–64.
  • Unrau, N. J. (1992). The TASK of reading (and writing) arguments: A guide to building critical literacy. Journal of Reading, 35(6), 436–442.
  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437–480.
  • Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186. https://10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2
  • Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420−432. https://10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420