PLM Education: The State of the Art and Future Trends

10th International Scientific Conference Technics, Informatics and Education – TIE 2024, str. 284-292

АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Sanja Puzović , Jasmina Vesić Vasović , Vladan Paunović

Download Full Pdf  

DOI: 10.46793/TIE24.284P

САЖЕТАК /ABSTRACT:

New industrial initiatives and innovations are being brought forward at an increasingly rapid rate, radically transforming job profiles and imposing the need for new paradigms in engineering education. Over the last few decades, PLM has evolved into the key business paradigm for supporting companies’ efforts to achieve long-term sustainable competitiveness by balancing innovation and efficiency growth on the one hand and cost optimization on the other. New labor market demands, shaped by rapid PLM evolution, require a shift in current engineering education to adapt to new realities and better prepare engineers for future challenges. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the state of the art in PLM education, highlight issues facing PLM education, and discuss possible future trends and developments. The paper aims to increase awareness of the importance of PLM education development and encourage active debate about potential actions as responses to current issues.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS: 

PLM concept, PLM education, engineering education

ПРОЈЕКАТ / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, and these results are parts of the Grant No. 451-03-66/ 2024-03/200132 with University of Kragujevac – Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES

  1. Passow, H. J., & Passow, C. H. (2017). What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs emphasize? A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 475-526.
  2. Galikhanov, M. F., Barabanova, S. V., & Kaibiyainen, A. A. (2021). Core trends in engineering education: five years of the “Synergy” international conference. Higher Education in Russia, 30(1), 101-114.
  3. CIMdata (2023). Market analysis results, PLM market & industry forum, CIMdata.
  4. Johansson, B., Andersson, J., Lindskog, E., Berglund, J., & Skoogh, A. (2013). Evaluation and calculation of dynamics in environmental impact assessment. International Conference, APMS 2012, Rhodes, Greece, 135-141. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  5. Singh, S., Misra, S. C., & Kumar, S. (2021). Institutionalization of product lifecycle management in manufacturing firms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Managemen
  6. Soto-Acosta, P., Placer-Maruri, E. & Perez-Gonzalez, D. (2016) A case analysis of a product lifecycle information management framework for SMES. International Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 240–244.
  7. Plo, L., Robin, V., & Girard, P. (2016). Understanding PLM system concepts to facilitate its implementation in SME: the real case study of POULT. In IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, 512-522. Springer, Cham.
  8. Eigner, M. (2021). System lifecycle management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  9. Gandhi, P. (2014). Product lifecycle management in education: key to innovation in engineering and technology. In Product Lifecycle Management for a Global Market: 11th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, 121-128. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  10. Grieves, M. (2006). Product Lifecycle Management: driving the next generation of lean thinking. McGraw-Hill.
  11. Burchardt, C. (2015). Establishing product-lifecycle management education at university in industry context. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, 1-7. IEEE.
  12. CIMdata (2005). The high-end MCAD and cPDm market segments of the PLM industry, CIMdata.
  13. Corallo, A., Latino, M. E., Lazoi, M., Lettera, S., Marra, M., & Verardi, S. (2013). Defining product lifecycle management: A journey across features, definitions, and concepts. International Scholarly Research Notices,
  14. Wang, Z. L., Liu, H. C., Xu, J. Y., & Ping, Y. J. (2021). A new method for quality function deployment using double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and axiomatic design approach. Quality Engineering, 33(3), 511-522.
  15. Fradl, B., Sohrweide, A., & Nyffenegger, F. (2017). PLM in education–the escape from boredom. In Product Lifecycle Management and the Industry of the Future: 14th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, 297-307.
  16. Van Til, R. (2019). Integrating PLM into engineering education: PLM case study. Product Lifecycle Management: Case Studies, 21-27.
  17. Padillo, A., Racero, J., Molina, J. C., & Eguía, I. (2018). PLM for education. The next generation of engineers. In Product Lifecycle Management to Support Industry 4.0: 15th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, 327-337. Springer International Publishing.
  18. Vila, C., Ugarte, D., Ríos, J., & Abellán, J. V. (2017). Project-based collaborative engineering learning to develop Industry 4.0 skills within a PLM framework. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1269-1276.
  19. Conlon, J. (2021). Foregrounding pedagogy in PLM implementations in higher education: A case study from the UK. In IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, 341-352. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  20. Edl, M. (2013). Educational framework of product lifecycle management issues for master and PhD study programmes. In Advances in Production Management Systems, Greece, 614-621. Springer Berlin.
  21. Tamaki, K. Y., Park, Y. W., Abe, T., & Goto, S. Development of educational programs for global-PLM producer through action project group activities by industry-university cooperation.
  22. Sahu, K., & Panda, B. P. The challenge of teaching PLM to Management Students: A KIIT-DS PLM case study. Marketing, 5, 522.
  23. Procopio, D., Morris, J., & Wagner, J. R. (2023). Application of product lifecycle management in the University classroom and laboratory. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Baltimore Convention Center.
  24. CIMdata (2020). Modernization of PLM––accelerating innovation, CIMdata
  25. CIMdata (2022). Sustainability and PLM, CIMdata
  26. Ji, X., & Abdoli, S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities in Product Life Cycle Management in the context of Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 119, 29-34.
  27. Pham, D. T., & Afify, A. A. (2005). Machine-learning techniques and their applications in manufacturing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 219(5), 395-412.
  28. Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2018). Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94, 3563-3576.
  29. Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., & Wartzack, S. (2017). Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 141-144.
  30. Lu, Y., Liu, C., Kevin, I., Wang, K., Huang, H., & Xu, X. (2020). Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 61, 101837.
  31. Pang, J., Huang, Y., Xie, Z., Li, J., & Cai, Z. (2021). Collaborative city digital twin for the COVID-19 pandemic: A federated learning solution. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 26(5), 759-771.
  32. CIMdata (2017). Achieving the most from Model Based Enterprise implementations,
  33. Tata Technologies (2018). MBSE-PLM alignment to support industry 4.0 and IIOT, Tata Technologeis.