STRUCTURAL FAILURES IN TIMBER STRUCTURES: ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL FAILURE MODES AND THEIR POSSIBLE CAUSES


XIII Međunarodno naučno-stručno savetovanje Ocena stanja, održavanje i sanacija građevinskih objekata  (str. 23-40)

АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S): Ivan Glišović

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/SGISXIII.03IG

САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:

Damages or failures in timber structures have created a negative image for timber as a building material. This can raise speculations and doubts about the safety level of existing timber structures. The objective of this paper is to identify typical failure modes and their causes. Experiences from previous failure investigations are summarised. Bending failures and tension perpendicular to the grain failures are common failure modes for beams. The main type of damage affecting the integrity of cross-sections is cracking along the grain. Causes for such damages are related to overloading, frequently changing wood moisture content and tensile stresses perpendicular to the grain resulting from geometry of structural elements. In the case of failure of trusses, frames and arches dominant failure mode is instability caused by insufficient bracing. The majority of failures can be linked to design and construction errors. Manufacturing errors (wood quality, production principles and methods) only cause a small number of the failures. In order to minimise or avoid errors and thereby occurrence of failures, different recommendations are given.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:

timber structure, failure analysis, cracks, moisture, instability

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:

[1] Al Sabouni-Zawadzka A., Gilewski W., Król P.A., Pełczynski J.: Controversy over cracks in glued laminated timber beams. XXX Russian-Polish-Slovak Seminar Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering (RSP 2021), Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 189. Springer, 2022, pp. 81-90.
[2] Bell K.: Shear failure in glulam frames – An actual case. COST Action E55, Assessment of Failures and Malfunctions: Guidelines for Quality Control, Shaker Verlag GmbH, 2011.
[3] Brunauer A.: The practical design of dowel-type connections in timber engineering structures according to EC5. Cost Action FP1402, International Conference on Connections in Timber Engineering – From Research to Standards. Graz, Austria, 2017, pp. 6-14.
[4] Cabrero J.M, Iraola B, Yurrita M.: Chapter 7 – Failure of timber constructions. Handbook of Materials Failure Analysis, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2018, pp. 123-152.
[5] Colling F.: Lernen aus Schäden in Holzbau – Ursachen, Vermeidung, Beispiele. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Holzforschung, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, 2000.
[6] Danielsson H.: Perpendicular to grain fracture analysis of wooden structural elements – Models and applications. PhD thesis, Division of Structural Engineering: Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2013.
[7] Dietsch P., Tannert T.: Assessing the integrity of glued-laminated timber elements. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 101, pp.1259-1270.
[8] Dietsch P., Winter S.: Structural failure in large-span timber structures: A comprehensive analysis of 230 cases. Structural Safety, 2018, 71, 41-46.
[9] Dröge G., Dröge T.: Schäden an Holztragwerken Schadenfreies Bauen. Band 28, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, 2003.
[10] Ellingwood B.: Design and construction error effects on structural reliability. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1987, 113(2), pp. 409-422.
[11] Franke S., Franke B., M. Harte A.M.: Failure modes and reinforcement techniques for timber beams – State of the art. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 97, pp. 2-13.
[12] Frese M., Blaß H.J.: Statistics of damages to timber structures in Germany. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(11), pp. 2969-2977.
[13] Frühwald E, Serrano E, Toratti T, Emilsson A, Thelandersson S.: Design of safe timber structures – How can we learn from structural failures in concrete, steel and timber? Report TVBK-3053, Division of Structural Engineering: Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2007.
[14] Frühwald Hansson E.: Analysis of structural failures in timber structures: Typical causes for failure and failure modes. Engineering Structures 2011, 33, pp. 2978–2982.
[15] Gray G.W., Gilham P.C.: Repair and reinforcement of glulam beams for Tinora High School. 9th World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE 2006), Portland, USA, 2006, pp. 1744-1751.
[16] Hansson M., Larsen H.J.: Recent failures in glulam structures and their causes. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2005, 12, pp. 808‐818.
[17] Kaminetzsky D.: Design and Construction Failures – lessons from forensic investigations. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1991.
[18] Müller A., Franke B.: Zustandserfassung – Einführung und Methodik. Workshop Theorie und Praxis – Zustandserfassung und Erhaltung von Holztragwerken, Biel, Switzerland, 2021, pp. 19-33.
[19] Munch-Andersen J., Dietsch P.: Robustness considerations from failures in two large-span timber roof structures. Joint Workshop of COST Actions TU0601 and E55, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2009, pp. 1-8.
[20] Roy Y., Thong W.C.: Exploring Wood-Framed Roof Collapses: Causation and Identifying Responsible Parties. J.S. Held LLC, 2024, pp. 1-11.
[21] Winter S., Kreuzinger H.: The Bad Reichenhall ice-arena collapse and the necessary consequences for wide span timber structures. 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE 2008), Miyazaki, Japan, 2008, pp1978-1985.