8th International Scientific Conference Modern Trends in Agricultural Production, Rural Development and Environmental Protection (2026) [pp. 69-76]
AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Milan Biberdžić
, Jelena Stojiljković
, Vera Rajičić
, Saša Barać
, Dragana Lalević
, Danijela Prodanović
, Milomirka Madić 
Download Full Pdf 
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/8thMTAgricult.069B
ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:
These researches were carried out in 2016 and 2017 on the territory of the municipality of Leskovac. The experiment included 6 maize hybrids different vegetation length (ZP 434, NS 4023, ZP 555, NS 5051, ZP 666, NS 6030) and 3 sowing densities (71428 plants per ha-1; 57142 plants per ha-1 and 47619 plants per ha-1). The experiment was set up according to the randomized block system in 3 replications. Differences in yield between hybrids with a shorter vegetation period, are less pronounced than in cases of hybrids with a longer vegetation period. The length of the growing season of hybrids influenced the differences in yield when different sowing densities were in question. Thus, in hybrids with shorter vegetation (ZP 434 and NS 4023), the highest average yield was in the case of the highest densities, while in hybrids with medium vegetation length (ZP 555 and NS 5051), there were no statistically significant differences in average yield between sowing densities. Hybrids with a longer vegetation period (ZP 666 and NS 6030) achieved the highest yields in the lowest and medium densities and they were significantly higher than the average yields achieved in the highest sowing densities. Considering that lately we have more and more dry years, it is necessary to grow hybrids with defferent length of vegetation, in order to make production safer. In addition, it is absolutely necessary to adapt the sowing density to the length of the hybrid vegetation.
KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:
Maize, vegetation length, sowing density, yield
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / ПРОЈЕКАТ:
This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, Project No 451-03-65/2024-03/200189.
REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:
- Barakatullah R. and Safdary A.J. (2021). Effect of sowing date and plant density on yield and yield components of three maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in Takhar climatic conditions of Afghanistan.Cent Asian J Plant Sci Innov 2 (2021) 109-120. Afghanistan.
- Bassey, E.U., Onyinyechi, J.K. (2019. Crop water requirements during growth period of maize (Zea mays L.) in a moderate permeability soil on coastal plain sands. International Journal of Plant Research 9, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.plant.20190901.01.
- Bello, B.O., Olawuyi, J.O, Ige, A.S., Mahamood, J., Afolabi, S.M., Azeez, A.M., Abdulmaliq, Y.S. (2014). Agro-nutritional variations of quality protein maize (Zea Mays L.) in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 59(2):101-116.
- Božić M., Nikolić G., Stević D., Životić Lj., Dragović S. (2007). Ublažavanje suše primenom navodnjavanja u proizvodnji kukuruza. Vodoprivreda, 0350-0519, 39 (2007) 229-230 p. 357-365.
- Bošnjak, Đ., Pejić, B. (1997). Odnos navodnjavanja i zemljišne suše prema prinosu kukuruza u Vojvodini. u: Zbornik radova IX Kongresa Jugoslovenskog društva za proučavanje zemljišta, Novi Sad: Mala knjiga, str. 624-631.
- Jaramaz M. (2015). Effects of plant density oh yield and maize grain quality under irrigated and rainfed conditions. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, doctoral dissertation.
- Lalić B, Eitzinger J, Mihailovic DT, Thaler S, Jancic M. (2013). Climate change impacts on winter wheat yield change-which climatic parameters are crucial in Pannonian lowland? The Journal of Agricultural Science, 151(6), 757.
- Lobell DB and Burke MB (2010). On the use of statistical models to predict crop yield responses to climate change. Agric.Forest Metero. 150:1443-145.
- Maitah M., Malec K., Maitah K. (2021). Influence of precipitation and temperature on maize production in the Czech Republic from 2002 to 2019. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 10467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89962-2.
- Mandić V, Bijelić Z, Krnjaja V, Tomić Z, Stanojković-Sebić A, Stanojković A, Caro Petrović V. (2016). The effect of crop density on maize grain yield. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 32(1): 83-90.
- Pejić, B ., Bošnjak, Dj , Mačkić K., Stričević R., Simić, D ., Drvar A. (2009). Osetljivost kukuruza (Zea mays L.) na deficit vode u zemljištu u odredjenim podperiodima vegetacije. Letopis naučnih radova Godina 33 (2009), broj I, strana 155-166.
- Petrović G., Karabašević D., Vukotić S., Mirčetić V., Radosavac A. (2000). The impact of climate change on the corn yield in Serbia. Acta Agriculturae Serbica, 25 (50), 133‒140,Čačak.
- Sadras, O.V., Calderini, D. (2009). Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy. Academic Press, Adelaide Research and Scholarship.
- Solomon, K. F., Y. Chauhan, and A. Zepp (2017). Risks of yield loss due to variation in optimum density for different maize genotypes under variable environmental conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 203.6 (2017): 519-527.
- Starčević, Lj. i D. Latković (2005). Prinos kukuruza u Vojvodini, 2004. godine bio je najviši u poslednjih 10 godina (5.88 t/ha), da li je moglo biti više? Da! Zb. rad. Instituta za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, Novi Sad, 41: 385-394.
- Tigchelaar M., Battisti DS., Naylor RL., Ray DK. (2018). Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
- Škorić, A. (1991). Sastav i svojstva tla. Fakultet poljoprivrednih znanosti. Zagreb.
- Živanovic, Lj. (2005). Uticaj vremena setve na ontogenezu i prinos hibrida kukuruza razlicite duzine vegetacionog perioda, Magistarska teza, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Beograd.
