ИСТРАЖИВАЧКА НАСТАВА МАТЕМАТИКЕ – ПУТ КА РАНОМ АЛГЕБАРСКОМ ОБРАЗОВАЊУ

Узданица XXII-III (2025) (стр. 45-63)

АУТОР(И) / AUTHOR(S):Ненад С. Милинковић   Сања М. Маричић  Бојан Лазић

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/Uzdanica22.3.045M

САЖЕТАК / ABSTRACT:

Аутори у раду указују на важност учења садржаја алгебре на раном узрасту, али и на проблеме и потешкоће који прате то учење. У циљу да изнађу методички оквир учења садржаја алгебре који ће да резултира учењем са разумевањем, скрећу пажњу на истраживачку наставу. У том контексту указују на карактеристике и методичке вредности ове врсте наставе и представљају методички оквир кроз следеће фазе учења – провокација, формулисање питања, експериментисање, дискусија, рефлексија и документација. Идеја је да ученици кроз наведене фазе учења откривањем и манипулацијом конкретним предметима истражују и формирају појмове ране алгебре. На конкретним примерима садржаја у раду је показано како се истраживачком наставом може формирати појам функционалне зависности, појам једначине и неједначине и како ученици да овладају решавањем једначинa и неједначина са разумевањем. Циљ овако обликоване наставе ране алгебре јесте боље разумевање основних алгебарских појмова, кроз активно ученичко конструисање сопствених закључака.

КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ / KEYWORDS:

математика, рана алгебра, истраживачка настава, активно учење, научно знање.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА / REFERENCES:

  • Глоговац, Д., Милошевић, М., Лазић, Б. (2021). Могућности примене истраживачки засноване наставе (ИН) у почетном математичком образовању. У: С. Маринковић (ур.), Наука, настава, учење у измењеном друштвеном контексту. Ужице: Педагошки факултет, 483–500.
  • Зељић, М. (2014). Методички аспекти ране алгебре. Београд: Универзитет у Београду, Учитељски факултет.
  • Милинковић, Н. (2021). Контекстуални приступ настави алгебре у млађим разредима основне школе (докторска дисертација). Универзитет у Крагујевцу: Педагошки факултет у Ужицу.
  • Милинковић, Н., Маричић, С. (2022). Непозната и променљива – проблем учења ране алгебре. У: С. Маринковић (ур.), Наука и образовање – изазови и перспективе. Ужице: Педагошки факултет, 245–262.
  • Стојкановић, Ј., Маричић, С. (2025). Развијање раног алгебарског мишљења путем визуелно задатих растућих низова код ученика млађих разреда основне школе. Иновације у настави, 38(4), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2504078S
  • Akgün, L., Özdemir, M. E. (2006). Students’ understanding of the variableas general number and unknown: A case study. The Teaching of Mathematics, 16, 45–51.
  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
  • Artigue, M., Baptist, P. (2012). Inquiry in mathematics education. Bruxelles: European Commission.
  • Artigue, M., Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
  • Artigue, M., Bosch, M., Doorman, M., Juhász, P., Kvasz, L., Maass, K. (2020). Inquiry-based mathematics education and the development of learning trajectories.
  • Teaching Mathematics and Computer Science, 18(3), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.5485/ TMCS.2020.0505
  • Baptist, P., Artigue, M. (2012). Inquiry in mathematics education: Background resources for implementing inquiry in science and mathematics at school (Fibonacci Project).
  • Paris: La main à la pâte / Fibonacci Project.
  • Bazzini, L., Boero, P. (2004). Inequalities in mathematics education: The need for complementary perspectives. In: M. J. Høines, A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the
  • 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematic sEducation, 2, Bergen, Norway: PME, 137–166. https://hdl.handle.net/2318/102356
  • Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 30–33.
  • Blanton, M., Kaput, J. (2004). Elementary Grades Students’ Capacity for Func-
  • tional Thinking. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 135–142.
  • Blanton, M. L., Kaput, J. J. (2011): Functional thinking as a route into algebra in
  • the elementary grades. In: J. Cai, E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
  • 3-642-17735-4_2 Brizuela, B. M., Schliemann, A. D. (2003). Fourth graders solving equations. In: N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, Honolulu:
  • College of Education, University of Hawaii, 137–144. Cai, J., Ng, D., Moyer, J. (2005). Developing algebraic thinking in earlier grades. Proceedings of PME, 29(1), 39–66.
  • Carak, O., Dikmenli, M., Saritas, O. (2008). Effect of 5E instructional model in student success in primary school 6th year circulatory systemtopic. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 1–11.
  • Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M. V., Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematical generalization. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education,40(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0067-7
  • Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., Brizuela, B. (2000). Early algebra, early arithmetic: Treating operations as functions. Plenary address presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tucson, AZ. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates / Taylor & Francis Group and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., Schwartz, J. (2008). Early algebra is not the same as algebra early. In: J. Kaput, D. Carraher, M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades, 235–272.
  • Dabić Boričić, M. Zeljić, M. (2021). Modelovanje ekvivalencije matematičkih izraza u početnoj nastavi. Inovacije u nastavi, 34(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.5937/ino-
  • vacije2101030D
  • Chowdhury, R. (2016). Inquiry-based learning as an instructional strategy to increase student achievement in math and science. In: M. Simonson (Ed.), Selected papers on the practice of educational communications and technology: 39th Annual proceedings.
  • Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 177–188. Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44.
  • Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E., Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? In: O. E. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca, C. P. Constantinou (Eds.), Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 1–23.
  • De Jong, T. (2006). Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312(5773),532–533. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127750
  • Dorier, J. L., García, F. J. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-dayt eaching. ZDM, 45(6), 837–849. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11858-013-0512-8
  • Engeln, K., Euler, M., Maass, K. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science: A comparative baseline study of teachers’ beliefs and practices across 12 European countries. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0507-5
  • Filloy, E., Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 19–25.
  • Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century.
  • New York: Farrar, Strausand Giroux.
  • Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of
  • Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
  • Greene, M., Renesse, C. (2016). A path to designing inquiry activities in mathematics. PRIMUS, 27(7), 646–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1211203
  • Hammerman, E. (2006). 8 essentials of inquiry-based science, K–8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner and Sweller. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
  • Hoch, M., Dreyfus, T. (2004). Structure sense in highschool algebra: The effect of brackets. In: M. J. Høines, A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, Bergen, Norway: PME, 49–56.
  • Jessen, B., Doorman, M., Bos, R. (2017). Praktični MERIA vodič za istraživački usmerenu nastavu matematike. Projekt MERIA.
  • Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898– 921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10115
  • Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311062
  • Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In: D. A. Grouws
  • (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, New York, NY: Macmillan, 390–419.
  • Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it? The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 139–151.
  • Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034852
  • Krugly-Smolska, E., Taylor, P. C. (Eds.). (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/ sce.10118
  • Laudano, F., Tortoriello, S. F., Vincenzi, G. (2019). An experience of teaching algorithms using inquiry-based learning. In: P. Díaz Kinshuk, I. Aedo, E. Mora (Eds.). International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(3), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1565453
  • Lazonder, A. W., Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi. org/10.3102/0034654315627366
  • Mäeots, M., Pedaste, M., Sarapuu, T. (2008). Transforming students’ inquiry skills with computer-based simulations. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies IEEE, 938–942. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2008.239
  • Maričić, S., Milinković, N., Brković, M. (2023). The equals sign: The challenges of learning arithmetic. In: A. Istenič, M. Gačnik, B. Horvat, M. Kukanja Gabrijelčič, V. Riccarda Kiswarday, M. Lebeničnik, M. Mezgec, M. Volk (Eds.), Upbringing and education between the past and the future. Koper: Univerza na Primorskem, 471–491.
  • Milinković, N., Maričić, S., Đokić, O. (2022). The equals sign: The problem of early algebra learning and how to solve it. Inovacije u nastavi, 35(3), 26–43. https://doi. org/10.5937/inovacije2203026M
  • Milinkovic, N., Maričić, S., Lazić, B. (2022). The problem of (mis)understanding the equals sign in junior grades of primary school. Uzdanica, XIX, 95–113.
  • Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
  • Molina, M., Castro, E., Ambrose, R. (2005). Enriching arithmetic learning by promoting relational thinking. The International Journal of Learning, 12(5), 265–270. https:// doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v12i05/47502
  • Pedaste, M., Baucal, A., Reisenbuk, E. (2021). Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: Development of item sand scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00278-z
  • Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Leijen, Ä., Sarapuu, T. (2012). Improving students’ inquiry skills through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 9(1–2), 81–95.
  • Rezba, R. J., Auldridge, T., Rhea, L. (1998). Teaching & learning the basic science skills. Richmond, VA: Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Middle School Instructional Services.
  • Schliemann, A. D., Carraher, D. W., Brizuela, B. M., Earnest, D., Goodrow, A., Lara-Roth, S., Peret, I. (2003). Algebra in elementary school. International group for the psychology of mathematics education, 4, 127–134.
  • Schumacher, S. Roth, J. (2015). Guided inquiry learning of fractions: A representational approach. In: K. Krainer, N. Vondrová (Eds.), CERME9 – Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Prague: Charles University, 2545–2551.
  • Seyhan, H., Morgil, I. (2007). The effect of 5E learning model on teaching of acidbase topic in chemistry education. Journal of Science Education, 8(2), 120–123.
  • Sfard, A., Linchevski, L. (1994). Between arithmetic and algebra: In the search of a missing link ‒ the case of equations and inequalities. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico, 52(3), 279–307.
  • Skoumpourdi, C. (2019). Inquiry-based implementation of a mathematical activity in a kindergarten classroom. In: U. T. Jankvist, M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME11), Utrecht: Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, 2347–2350.
  • Spronken-Smith, R. (2008). Experiencing the process of knowledge creation: The nature and use of inquiry-based learning in higher education. https://ako.ac.nz/assets/ Knowledge-centre/Hei-toko/inquiry-based-learning/SUMMARY-REPORT-Inquirybased-Learning.pdf
  • Stacey, K., MacGregor, M. (1999). Learning the algebraic method of solving problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00026-7
  • Stephens, A., Blanton, M., Knuth, E., Isler, I., Gardiner, A. M. (2015). Just say yes to early algebra! Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5951/ teacchilmath.22.2.0092
  • Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., Geban, Ö. (2001). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to students’ understanding of the human circulatory system. School Science and Mathematics, 101(2), 91–101. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18010.x
  • Vergnaud, G. (1985). Understanding mathematics at the secondary-school level. In: A. Bell, B. Low, J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Theory, research & practice in mathematical education. Nottingham, UK: Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham, 27–45.
  • Wu, S. C., Lin, F. L. (2016). Inquiry-based mathematics curriculum design for young children teaching experiment and reflection. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1233a