MIŠLJENJE STUDENATA – BUDUĆIH UČITELJA  O RAZVOJU MATEMATIČKE PISMENOSTI U PRVOM CIKLUSU OBRAZOVANJA

Nauka i nastava u vaspitno-obrazovnom kontekstu (2020), (str. 347-364)

AUTOR(I): MARIJANA Ž. ZELJIĆ, MILANA M. DABIĆ BORIČIĆ

E-ADRESA: marijana.zeljic@uf.bg.ac.rs

Download Full Pdf 

DOI:10.46793/STEC20.347Z

SAŽETAK:

Iako je pojam matematičke pismenosti predmet brojnih istraživanja, ne postoji konsenzus o značenju termina. Cilj ove ove studije jeste da se istraži koncepcija matematičke pismenosti budućih učitelja. Podaci su prikupljeni kroz polustrukturisani intervju sa 13 studenata Učiteljskog fakulteta. Koncepcija matematičke pismenosti može se svr- stati u četiri kategorije: 1) poznavanje i sposobnost komunikacije matema- tičkim jezikom; 2) konceptualno razumevanje pojmova, sadržaja i proce- dura; 3) primena matematike u svakodnevnom životu; 4) primena logičko- matematičkog mišljenja i rešavanje problema. Svi ispitanici su naveli sposobnost učenika da formuliše, reprezentuje i reši matematičke probleme, kao i precizno i korektno korišćenje simboličkog matematič- kog jezika kao izuzetno važne kompetencije za matematičku pismenost, dok je skoro polovina ispitanika isključila sklonost učenika da matematiku vidi kao koristan predmet kao kompetenciju koja je važna. Uverenja i znanja učitelja značajno će uticati na razvoj matematičke pismenosti uče- nika i važno je stvoriti uslove u kojim će učitelji razumeti koncept i razviti bogatiju koncepciju matematičke pismenosti

KLJUČNE REČI:

matematička pismenost, kompetencije učenika, sta- vovi/uverenja, obrazovanje učitelja

LITERATURA:

  • Blum, W. & Boromeo Feri, R. (2009). Mathematical Modelling: Can It Be Taught and Learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45–58.
  • Blum, W. & Leiss, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum & S. Khan (eds.): Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering, and economics (222–231). Chichester: Horwood.
  • Brewer, D. J. & Stasz, C. (1996). Enhancing opportunity to learn measures in NCES data. Santa Monica: RAND.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • Dabić Boričić, M. Vulić, I. & Videnović, M. (2020). (in press). Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions of Mathematical Literacy fand Assessment of Mathematical Knowledge. MARE Malta Applied Research in Education, 1(1), 97–116.
  • Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid  approach  of  inductive  and   deductive   coding   and   theme  development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 80–92.
  • Gellert, U. (2004). Didactic material confronted with the concept of mathematical literacy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1), 163–179.
  • Genc, M. & Erbas, A. K. (2019). Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions of Mathematical Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(3), 222–237.
  • Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical Literacy. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. K. S. (eds.): Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education (75–102). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Jablonka, E. & Niss, M. (2014). Mathematical literacy. In S. Lerman, B. Sriraman, E. Jablonka, Y. Shimizu, M. Artigue, R. Even, R. Jorgensen & M. Graven (eds.): Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (391–396). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
  • Julie, C. (2006). Mathematical literacy: Myths, further inclusions, and exclusions. Pythagoras, 12(1), 62–69.
  • Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding Mathematical Literacy: The Contribution of Research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 101–116.
  • Liu, X. (2009). Linking competence to opportunities to learn: Models of competence and data mining. New York: Springer.
  • Mbekwa, M. (2006). Teachers’ views on mathematical literacy and on their experiences as students of the course. Pythagoras, 63, 22–29.
  • Mhakure, D. & Mokoena, M. A. (2011). A Comparative Study of the FET Phase Mathematical Literacy and Mathematics Curriculum. US-China Education Review B3, 309–323.
  • Niss, M. (2015). Mathematical Competencies and PISA. In K. Stacey & R. Turner (eds.): Assessing Mathematical Literacy (35–55). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • OECD (2005). The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Executive Summary. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from the World Wide Web https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf.
  • OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from the World Wide Web https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-7-en.
  • OECD (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematics, financial, literacy and collaborative problem solving, revised edition. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from the World Wide Web https://www.oecd.org/publications/pisa-2015-assessment-and-analytical-framework-9789264281820-en.htm.
  • Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn  into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.
  • Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations. OECD.
  • Schmidt, W. H. & McKnight, C. C. (1995). Surveying educational opportunity in mathematics and science: An international perspective. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 17(3), 337–353.
  • Venkat, H. (2010). Exploring the nature and coherence of mathematical work in South African mathematical literacy classrooms. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 53–68.
  • Verschaffel, L., Greer, B. & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Wilkins, J. L. M. (2000). Preparing for the 21st century: The status of quantitative literacy in the United States. School Science and Mathematics, 100(8), 405–418.
  • Yore, L. D., Pimm, D. & Tuan, H. L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589.