ODGOVORNOST TREĆIH LICA ZA KRŠENJE KARTELNE ZABRANE U PRAVU KONKURENCIJE EVROPSKE UNIJE

Sloboda pružanja usluga i pravna sigurnost (2019)  str. 791-811

AUTOR(I): Stefan Šokinjov

Download FullPdf 

DOI: 10.46793/XVMajsko.791S

SAŽETAK:

Od uvođenja kartelne zabrane pa sve do danas, za narušavanje konkurencije odgovaraju konkurenti koji su u međusobnoj tržišnoj utakmici kolektivnim aktima restriktivne poslovne prakse ograničili ili od sebe otklonili konkurencijski pritisak. Predmet ovog rada je odgovornost za narušavanje konkurencije onih tržišnih učesnika koji nisu u konkurentskom odnosu prema članovima kartela, koji ne posluju na tržištu na kojem se ograničava konkurencija i koji članovima kartela pružaju usluge koje ovima olakšavaju, a ponekad i omogućavaju, realizaciju restriktivnog sporazuma. Kartelnopravni institut odgovornosti trećih lica nastao je u administrativnoj i sudskoj praksi organa Evropske unije. U tom smislu je u radu dat hronološki prikaz najvažnijih odluka kojima se utvrđivala odgovornost trećih lica za narušavanje konkurencije.

KLJUČNE REČI: 

kartelno pravo, Evropska unija, treća lica, pružaoci usluga.

LITERATURA:

  • Vallery, A., Schell, C., AC-Treuhand: Substantial Fines for Facilitators of Cartels, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice No. 4/2016.
  • Gurkaynak, G., Ozkanli, C., Simsek, S. and Mollaoglu, N.C., ShadyContoursofCartelLiabilityof ServiceProviders, Competition Law International No. 1/2017.
  • Knapp, M., Liability for Anti-Competitive Conduct of a Third Party under EU Competition Law, Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies No. 11/2017.
  • Prewit, E., Fails, G., Indirect information exchanges to hub-and-spoke cartels: enforcement and litigationtrendsintheUnitedStatesandEurope, Competition Law & Policy Debate No. 2/2015.
  • Rodriguez, E.A., Noorali, R., Case T-180/15 Icap v. Commission: The Facilitator Doctrine and OtherCartelConceptsinHybridSettlements, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, No. 5/2018.
  • Talbot, C., AC-Treuhand, the Scope of Article 101 TFEU, and the Future of Actions for Antitrust Damages, Commercial Law Practitioner No. 1/2016.
  • Carić, S., Bankarski poslovi i hartije od vrednosti, Novi Sad 1996.
  • Weert, W. van, Christian, G., Cartel Facilitators Beware – AC Treuhand Spurs Competition Authorities into Action, Global Competition Policy No. Aug/2009.
  • Ysewyn, J., Corbett L., CaseT-180/15ICAPandOthersv.Commission,10November2017:Win- wininthecartelsettlementprocedure:istherea shift in the balance of power? Competition Law and Policy Debate No. 1/2018.

Presude i mišljenja Opšteg pravobranioca

  • T-99/04 AC-Treuhand AG v. Commission of the European Communities (organic peroxides) ECLI:EU:T:2008:256.
  • C-194/14 P AC-Treuhand AG v. European Commission (tin stabiliser and ESBO/esters heat stabiliser) ECLI:EU:C:2015:717.
  • T-180/15 ICAP v. European Commission (Yen interest rate derivatives sector), ECLI:EU:T:2017:795.
  • OpinionofAdvocateGeneralWahldeliveredon21May2015(1),CaseC-194/14P AC-Treuhand AG v Commission ECLI:EU:2015:350.

Administrativna praksa

  • Commission Decision No. 80/1334/EEC of 17thDecember 1980 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/29.869 – Italian cast glass), OJ No L 383/19 of 31st December 1980.
  • CommissionDecision2005/349/ECof10thDecember2003relatingtoa proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-2/37.857— Organic peroxides), OJ 2005 L 110, p. 44.
  • Commission Decission C(2009) 8682 of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.589 – Heat Stabilisers).
  • Commission decision C(2013) 8602 of 4.12.2013 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (AT.39861 – Yen Interest Rate Derivatives).
  • Commission decision C(2015) 432 of 4.2.2015 relating to proceedings under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (AT.39861 – Yen Interest Rate Derivatives).
Dokumenti
  • Znanstveno  mišljenje  Hrvatske  agencije  za  hranu  o  migraciji  epoksidiranog  ulja soje
  • (ESBO) s poklopca staklenki koje sadrže tapenadu od zelenih maslina iz Hrvatske od 13. marta 2012.    godine    (https://www.hah.hr/pregled-upisnika/?  preuzmi_misljenje=23, pristupljeno januara 2019. godine).