RESILIENCY-ORIENTED AGRICULTURAL MODERNIZATION MODEL: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND PRACTICAL APPROACHES IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

VI international scientific conference Sustainable agriculture and rural development, 11-12. 12. 2025, Belgrade  [pp. 139-152]

 

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Eugenia Lucasenco , Alexandru Ceban

 
Download Full Pdf   

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46793/zbIEP25.139L

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

The agricultural sector of the Republic of Moldova represents a keystone of the national economy, even if it faces substantial challenges connected to climate change, insuficient modernization, low productivity and underdeveloped sub-sectors. The pursuit of achieving a resilient sector has become an essential priority, necessitating theoretical insights and practical modernization strategies. The paper is aiming to analyze the theoretical foundations of resiliency-oriented agricultural modernization model and to present their practical applicability in the context of the domestic agricultural sector. It combines an in-depth review of the academic literature in the field with an analysis of the model’s content. Findings present that diversification of sub-sectors and their revival, increasing competitiveness, as well as an enhanced public support can improve productivity and resilience of the sector. The results highlight that resiliency-oriented modernization should mix theoretical models with locally adapted practices, being supported by coherent governance and targeted support.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ: 

Resilience, agricultural sector, modernization, Republic of Moldova

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT / ПРОЈЕКАТ:

The article was developed within the framework of Subprogram 030101 „Strengthening the resilience, competitiveness, and sustainability of the economy of the Republic of Moldova in the context of the accession process to the European Union”, institutional funding.

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРA:

  • Alvarez-Cuadrado F, Poschke (2011). Structural change out of agriculture: labor push versus labor pull. Am Econ J Macroecon 3(3), 127 – 158.
  • Bebbington, A., Abromovay, R., Chiriboga, M. (2008). Social Movements and the Dynamics of Rural Territorial Development in Latin America. World Development, 36(12), 2874-2887.
  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford: Stanford university Press.
  • Birner, R., Resnick, D. (2010). The political economy of policies for smallholder agriculture. World development, 38(10) , 1442-1452.
  • Boincean,B. (2014). Rolul agriculturii în acordarea serviciilor ecosistemice şi sociale. Balti: Acad. de Ştiinţe a Moldovei.
  • Borne, G. (2010). Sustainable Development: Representing a reflexive modernity inside the United Nations. Journal of Global Analysis, 1 (1), 27 – 50.
  • Cimpoies, D., Muravschi, A., Racul, A. (2009). Land and Land Market in Moldova: what has been achieved during the transition period. IAMO Forum 2009, “20 Years of Transition in Agriculture: What has been achieved? Where are we heading?” (pg. 1 – 14). Halle (Saale): IAMO.
  • Dumbraveanu, L. (2012). Aspecte privind finanțarea în sectorul agrar. Studia Universitatis, Revista științifică a Universității de Stat din Moldova, nr.2(52), 131 – 136.
  • Febles-González J. M., Tolon-Becerra, A., Lastra-Bravo, X., Acosta-Valdes,
  • (2011). Cuban agricultural policy in the last 25 years. From conventional to organic agriculture. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 723-735.
  • Hardeman, E., Jochemsen, H. (2012). Are There Ideological Aspects to the Modernization of Agriculture? Agricultural Environmental Ethics, 657 – 674.
  • Klijnhout, (1965). Moderne Landbouw-politiek (Modern Agricultural Politics. Amsterdam/Brussel: Agon Elsevier, p. 27.
  • Kusz, D. (2014). Modernization of agriculture vs sustainable agriculture. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 171 – 178.
  • Lewis, W. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor. The Manchester School 22 (2), pg. 91 – 139.
  • Lucasenco, E.. (2013). Aspecte teoretice ale procesului de modernizare și istoricul dezvoltării sistemelor agricole. Analele Institutului de Economie, Finanțe și Statistică, ediția a III-a, 117 – 122.
  • Moroz, V., Ignat, A. (2013). Agricultural land-use changes and rural transformation in the Republic of Moldova. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 13 , Issue 1, 181 – 186.
  • Moroz, V., Stratan., A., Lucasenco, E. (2013). Modernization of the agricultural sector in the context of sustainable development in the Republic of Moldova. Scientific Papers Series Management , Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, Vol. 13, Issue 2, 405 – 410.
  • Ngai, R, Pissarides, (2007). Structural change in a multi-sector model of growth. Am Econ Rev 97(1), 429 – 443.
  • Olaganathan, R., Quigley, K. (2017). Technological Modernization and Its Impact on Agriculture, Fisheries and Fossil Fuel Utilization in the Asia Pacific Countries with Emphasis on Sustainability Perspective. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research (IJBR), 8(2)., 421 – 441.
  • Otchia, C. (2014). Agricultural Modernization, Structural Change and Pro-poor Growth: Policy Options for the Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of Economic Structures volume 3, Article number: 8, 1 –
  • Rasborg, K. (2012). ‘(World) risk society’ or ‘new rationalities of risk’? A critical discussion of Ulrich Beck’s theory of reflexive modernity. Thesis Eleven, 108 (1), 3 – 25.
  • Reardon, T., Berdegues, J., Escobar, G. (2001). Rural nonfarm employment and incomes in Latin America: Overview and policy implications. World Development, 29(3), 395 – 410.
  • Schultz, T. W. (1964). Transforming Traditional Agriculture. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • Self, S., Grabowski, R. (2017). Economic Development and the Role of Agricultural Technology. Agricultural Economics, 36, pg. 395–404.
  • Storesletten, K. et al. (2019). Business Cycle during Structural Change: Arthur Lewis theory from a neoclassical perspective. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 26181.
  • van der Ploeg, (1999). De Virtuele Boer (The Virtual Farmer). Assen: Van Gorcum.
  • Wenwu, Z et (2014). On the New Mode of Production of Agricultural Modernization . SHS Web of Conferences, 6, pg. 1 – 8.
  • Wolford, W. (2004). This land is ours now: A new perspective on social movement formation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(2), 40 – 424.
  • World Bank Group (2016). Structural transformation of small farms in Moldova : implications for poverty reduction and shared prosperity. Europe and Central Asia: World Bank.
  • Wu, Z. I. (2011). Research on Harmony between Agricultural Modernization and regional Economy Developmentin China. Asian Agricultural Research, 6 – 10.
  • Yifu Lin, J.(2018). Agriculture is key for economic transformation, food security, and nutrition. International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Zbanca, A., Panuta, S., Morei, V., Baltag, G. (2017). High value agriculture in the Republic of Moldova, comparative analysis and feasibility of investments. Scientific Papers. Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, USAVM of Bucharest. 2017, vol. 17(1), 473-478.
  • Zhang, Z., Li, , Elahi, E., Wang, Y. (2022). Comprehensive Evaluation of Agricultural Modernization Levels. Sustainability, 14(9), 5069, 1 – 17.