RESEARCH ACTIVITY IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION IN PRIMARY GRADES

1st International Scientific Conference Education and Artificial Intelligence (EDAI 2024), [pp. 121-128]

AUTHOR(S) / АУТОР(И): Valentina Chileva

Download Full Pdf   

DOI: 10.46793/EDAI24.121C

ABSTRACT / САЖЕТАК:

Mathematics education in primary grades has a developmental character. The main tools by which students’ thinking was developed until now were word problems. The new educational needs of modern students require other tools, apart from word problems. Whit a purpose to develop their mathematical and creative thinking we have to use new tools that meet their needs. These new tools are the research tasks. The research tasks provoke a research activity, which the students in the elementary grades independently discover new ways of applying already acquired mathematical knowledge. As a part of research activities student can use variety of Al tools. The specificity of the research activity allows the development of a number of personal and learning-cognitive qualities within the mathematics education in primary grades. This article presents a general structure of a research activity that students can carry out and offers some Al tools for helping them.

KEYWORDS / КЉУЧНЕ РЕЧИ:

primary grades, mathematics, research activities, artificial intelligence

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  • Angelova V., Z.Koleva (2018), Matematika za 3 klas, Prosveta plus.
  • Arsov V. (2023), Proektnata uchebna deinost v uroka po matematika v nachalnoto ucilishte, In: “Obrazovanie bez granici-realnost I perspektivi”, UI “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad.
  • Galperin P.(1966), Psihologia na misleneto I ucheneto za poetapno formirane na umstveni deistvia, Moskva. Galabova D. (2016), Didaktichen model “Konstruktivna matematika za deca”, In: “Pedagogika” № 9, 1159-1172.
  • Dalinger V. (2007), Uchebnoizsledovatelskata deinost na uchenicite v procesa na izuchavane na drobi I deistviqta s tqh, uchebno pomagalo, OMGPU.
  • Leontiev A. (1987), Deinost.Saznanie.Lichnost., Sofia . Lerner I. (1974), Problemno obuchenie, Moskva.
  • Manova A. (2012), Metodika na obuchenieto po matematika v nachalnite klasove, UI “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad.
  • Neminska R. (2016), Izsledovatelskiq podhod v uchebnite programi na nachalen etap na obrazovanie, In “Pedagogika”, № 7, 888-905.
  • Obuhov A. (20016), Razvitie izsledovatelskata deinost na uchenicite, Moskva.
  • Savenkov A. (2007), Psihologicheski osnovi na izsledovatelskoto obuchenie na uchenicite.
  • Stamenova I. (2015), Problemat za funkcionalnata gramotnost na uchenika v pedagogicheskoto prostranstvo na savremenoto nachalno uchilishte, In; “Pedagogicheski novosti”, № 1,72-82.
  • Stamenova I. (2016), Formirane I razvitie na funkcionalnata gramotnost v konteksta na lichnostnoorientiraniq podhod v obrazovanieto, In: “Pedagogika”, №5, 695-702.
  • Stoimenova Y. (2005), Organizacia na tvorcheskata deinost na uchenicite v nachalnite klasove, UI “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad.
  • Stoimenova Y.(2007), Urokat po matematika v I – IV klas: Osnovni uchebni deinosti, UI “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad .
  • Shashenkova E.(2010), Izsledovatelska deinost, Moskva.
  • Shtukina G.(1971), Problema za poznavatelniq interes v pedagogikata, Moskva. Zaprudski N.(2010), Savremeni uchilischtni tehnologii, Minsk.